-
-
Commonly Claimed Disabilities
Tinnitus | PTS(D) | Lumbosacral Cervical Strain | Scars | Limitation of flexion, knee | Diabetes | Paralysis of Siatic Nerve | Limitation of motion, ankle | Degenerative Arthritis Spine | TBI – Traumatic Brain Injury
- 0
Hcvets.com Surveillance Alert- "va Stops Qa To Clear Back Log"
Please post your question as a New Topic by clicking this link and choosing which forum to post in.
For almost everything you are going to want to post in VA Claims Research.
If this is your first time posting. Take a moment and read our Guidelines. It will inform you of what is and isn't acceptable and tips on getting your questions answered.
Remember, everyone who comes here is a volunteer. At one point, they went to the forums looking for information. They liked it here and decided to stay and help other veterans. They share their personal experience, providing links to the law and reference materials and support because working on your claim can be exhausting and beyond frustrating.
This thread may still provide value to you and is worth at least skimming through the responses to see if any of them answer your question. Knowledge Is Power, and there is a lot of knowledge in older threads.
-
Ads
-
Ads
-
Our picks
-
VA Will No Longer Drop Coverage of Veterans Being Cared for at Home
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
NBC10’s Lucy Bustamante has details on the Department of Veterans Affairs making changes to its at-home care reevaluations.
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
Attorney Wants Diagnosis for Secondary Complication to Rated Condition; Must it be through VA?
Cat4Christ777 posted a question in IMO Independent Medical Opinion,
Originally, this secondary condition was claimed as 'migraines,' but while it may begin as a migraine with a complication, the VA can--and has, more than once--made it so much worse (pain-wise). If it does not qualify as a migraine, then my attorney and I need to come up with a different diagnosis. It's definitely a neurological issue, possibly 'occipital neuralgia,' as the condition meets the criteria of its definition, here: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/occipital+neuralgia.-
-
- 24 replies
-
-
VALife insurance program coming January 2023 for Veterans with service connection
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
In January 2023, VA will launch a new life insurance program called Veterans Affairs Life Insurance (VALife), which provides guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance coverage to Veterans age 80 and under, with any level of service-connected disability. Some Veterans age 81 and older may also be eligible.-
-
- 2 replies
-
-
I found this quiet Interesting supreme court decison
Buck52 posted a question in VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims Research Forum,
click the link to read about this.
https://usmilitary.org/supreme-court-decision-may-affect-veterans-across-the-us-wave-disability-deadline-for-thousands/
From the Article
-
-
- 33 replies
-
-
VA Math, Confusing, Right? Calculate Your Final Rating Percentage!
Tbird posted a blog entry in Tbirds Blog,
10 + 50 = 50 and other VA math mysteries explained.
VA Math It’s Not Your Mother’s Arithmetic
“VA Math” is the way that the VA computes combined impairment ratings for multiple conditions in a Veteran’s compensation benefits claim – and it requires that you unlearn real math. When a Veteran has multiple medical conditions that are service-connected and the Veterans Affairs rates each at a different percentage, it would seem that they should just add up your percentages to get to a total body impairment rating.-
- 4 replies
-
-
-
Ads
-
Popular Contributors
-
Ad
-
Latest News
Question
allan 10
for retired veterans whose disabilities were linked to combat or military service.
From: HCVets@aol.com [mailto:HCVets@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:35 AM
To: colonel-dan@sbcglobal.net
Subject: HCVets.com Surveillance Alert- "VA stops QA to clear back log"
Oct 22, 5:34 PM EDT
Lawmaker: Pay to veterans is off by $20 million
By JIM ABRAMS
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Pentagon, in a rush to shrink a backlog of unprocessed claims, wrongfully denied money to nearly 2,000 severely disabled veterans, a House lawmaker said Wednesday.
Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, said his staff also calculated that the Pentagon made inaccurate payments of about $20 million to approximately 2,500 veterans who received payments in excess of $2,500 under a specific claims program.
Kucinich, in a letter to Teresa McKay, director of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, urged quick action to recalculate all "no pay due" determinations and payments in excess of $2,500 made for the claims program.
"Errors of that magnitude are disgraceful," Kucinich wrote, saying the Pentagon's contractor for the VA Retro program, Lockheed Martin, had miscomputed and mishandled awards for veterans equivalent to an entire combat brigade.
The VA Retro program enacted by Congress extended retroactive benefits for retired veterans whose disabilities were linked to combat or military service.
Kucinich said that around last March the DFAS, in order to clear up a multiyear backlog in VA Retro cases, suspended its quality control standards. It substituted Lockheed's less stringent standards, which led to the mistakes.
Last July, the House Oversight subcommittee on domestic policy that Kucinich chairs issued a report finding that about 28,000 veterans had their claims denied when the government stopped its quality assurance checks. On Wednesday, his staff said it had further calculated that, of the 28,000, between 1,782 and 1,985 disabled veterans were wrongfully denied a payment.
There was no estimate of the average denied payment, but the July report cited the case of an Army veteran wounded in Vietnam whose claim was initially rejected but who eventually was awarded $15,000.
The latest calculations also estimate errors of about $20 million, from both overpayments and underpayments, to veterans receiving more than $2,500. Kucinich said Pentagon rules that all payments in excess of $2,500 be subject to a second check were ignored when the office moved to clear up the backlog.
There was no immediate comment from DFAS. In July, a spokesman said the office had established "a reliable and repeatable process" allowing it to judge incoming claims within 30 days.
"Keep on, Keepin' on"
Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"
See my web site at:
http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/
Edited by allanLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Oct 23
1
Top Posters For This Question
allan 1 post
Popular Days
Oct 23 2008
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts