Jump to content
Using an Ad Blocker? Consider adding HadIt.com as an exception. Hadit.com is funded through advertising, ad free memberships, contributions and out of pocket. ×
  • 0

Haas Appeals To Supreme Court

This thread is over 365 days old and has been closed.

Please post your question as a New Topic by clicking this link and choosing which forum to post in.

For almost everything you are going to want to post in VA Claims Research.

If this is your first time posting. Take a moment and read our Guidelines. It will inform you of what is and isn't acceptable and tips on getting your questions answered. 


Remember, everyone who comes here is a volunteer. At one point, they went to the forums looking for information. They liked it here and decided to stay and help other veterans. They share their personal experience, providing links to the law and reference materials and support because working on your claim can be exhausting and beyond frustrating. 


This thread may still provide value to you and is worth at least skimming through the responses to see if any of them answer your question. Knowledge Is Power, and there is a lot of knowledge in older threads.




  • HadIt.com Elder

<H2 class=date-header>Thursday, October 23, 2008</H2><H3 class=post-title><A href="http://vnvets.blogspot.com/2008/10/haas-appeals-to-supreme-court.html">Haas Appeals to Supreme Court </H3>

Legal pleadings, as reading material, are usually dry, and often filled with convoluted references to other cases and decisions, and of course, the ubiquitous legal terms that are often foreign to us and sometimes approach the opposite of what they should mean in their definitions. We must be getting used to such after reading the filings of the Haas case over the past two years. We actually understand what they are saying, now. Mostly. Pretty much.

Our first read through of Friday's filing to the Supreme Court for a review of the decision at the Federal Circuit in the Haas case was begun with intimidation. This is a case going to the Supreme Court, perhaps the only governmental entity this nation has that is closest to being something to worship. But the pleading filed by Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP's Stephen Kinnaird, assisted and advised by the National Veterans Legal Services Program's attorneys [NVLSP], is, for all its length, a fairly simple document. It is perhaps the most complete, and well laid out legal document we've ever read.

We have become familiar with some of the more frequently cited case precedents such as the "Chevron deference" [Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC], and the "Pro-Veteran Canon" [brown v Gardner, and King v St. Vincent's Hospital].

The first gives a cabinet level department the right, duty, and authority to interpret legislation as it sees fit when translating the language of the legislation into workable, usable policy for the employees of that department to carry out. It was this precedent that the Federal Circuit Court cited as the main reason for reversing the Veterans Court decision in the Haas case.

The second, the "Pro-Veteran Canon", is a precedent established by the Supreme Court itself, which is, legislative ambiguity must be resolved in favor of the Veteran, even before applying deference [Chevron]. Translated, this means the "Pro-Veteran Canon" trumps the "Chevron deference".

In the Haas case, "Chevron" gives the Department of Veterans Affairs the right to define legislation it must administer as it sees fit to do under its charter. Therefore, it may define "Service in Vietnam" as it sees fit. This is what the Federal Circuit Court ruled in May. When the NVLSP asked for an en banc review, that is, a review by the entire Federal Circuit Court of the decision rendered in May by a two judges to one decision, it raised the question of the "Pro-Veteran Canon". The court responded by refusing the review the case, and rejecting the NVLSP claim of failure to apply the "Pro-Veteran Canon" because the NVLSP had not raised it in its pleading in the appeal.

In the pleading filed last Friday, Mr. Kinnaird takes the issue that the "Pro-Veteran Canon" need not be raised by a party to the suit, but should be applied by the courts.

He also pleads for a swift review by the Supreme Court:

"This Court’s review is justified alone by the critical importance of this case to the numerous blue-water Navy veterans who served in Vietnam and who have been (or will be) stricken with covered diseases. But it is especially critical that this Court grant review now. The Federal Circuit, which has exclusive jurisdiction over this statute, has definitively resolved this issue. Vietnam veterans who have contracted the serious diseases addressed in Section 1116 are likely to be in dire financial straits. Delay in receiving benefits could be severely prejudicial to many veterans. Many veterans will also be deprived of free, priority VA medical care available to persons with Agent Orange diseases, see 38 U.S.C. §1710(e)(1)(A), and may forego medical care altogether, with serious consequences.

"Moreover, if this Court were to deny review and the CAVC were to lift the current stay on Haas-related claims, many pending claims will be denied. Even if this Court were later to review and overturn the Federal Circuit’s rule, many claims will never be revived, and others would face a demanding standard of clear and unmistakable error. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1403(e); see also Jordan v. Nicholson, 401 F.3d 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2005). Other veterans may never file claims, and still others will lose benefits from preclaim periods if they are deterred by the decision below from filing. This Court’s immediate review is imperative."

As you can see from the above, not only does the filing take the legal question to hand and deal with it quite well, it takes the ethical question to hand as well, asking the court to show some mercy toward the already-ailing Blue Water Navy Veterans.There is much more to the brief that was filed on Friday, and most of it is technical points of law. We think the case will rise or fall on the merits of the "Pro-Veteran Canon" and the absurdity of the DVA's definition of "Service in Vietnam".

[Read the actual brief: click here, then click on the light green link labeled "Haas v Peake-Supreme Court".

Folks this is a job well done.

That said, it will be unusual for the court to agree to review the case, and even more so to overturn the Federal Circuit Court. Keep that in mind. The NVLSP hopes to have an answer sometime after the first of the year delete: in November] on whether the Supreme Court will review the case.

In the meantime, keep hitting your Congressional Representatives and Senators to support the Agent Orange Equity Act of 2009!

And keep recording your successes in the ongoing poll at the top right of the page.

Keep up the fight, keep up the good work.


”It is a stain on this nation's honor that the Department of Veterans Affairs has become a deadlier and more difficult adversary to the American veteran than any they have ever faced on a battlefield."-- VNVets

"The concept that Agent Orange, and its effects, stopped dead in its tracks at the shoreline is simply too illogical, and too ludicrous to accept. What does that say about the Bush Administration and his Department of Veterans Affairs?"--VNVets

"With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan--to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations." --President Abraham Lincoln

"It follows than as certain as that night succeeds the day, that without a decisive naval force we can do nothing definitive, and with it, everything honorable and glorious."--President George Washington

Copyright © 2005-2008: VNVets Blog; All Rights Reserved.


Posted by Novus Livy at 10:56


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

  • veterans-crisis-line.jpg
    The Veterans Crisis Line can help even if you’re not enrolled in VA benefits or health care.


  • Advertisemnt

  • question-001.jpegLooking for Answers? Here are tips for finding the answers you seek.


    All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. To post, you must register. Registration is free. You can register for a free account here.


    You can read the forums without registering.


    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question.
    2. Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.


    Leading to:


    Post straightforward questions and then post background information.


    • A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
    • I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
    • B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
        • I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?


    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.




    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed.
    • This process does not take long.
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
    • This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines