-
-
Commonly Claimed Disabilities
Tinnitus | PTS(D) | Lumbosacral Cervical Strain | Scars | Limitation of flexion, knee | Diabetes | Paralysis of Siatic Nerve | Limitation of motion, ankle | Degenerative Arthritis Spine | TBI – Traumatic Brain Injury
- 0
Two Articles In The Dav Magazine For Nov-dec
Please post your question as a New Topic by clicking this link and choosing which forum to post in.
For almost everything you are going to want to post in VA Claims Research.
If this is your first time posting. Take a moment and read our Guidelines. It will inform you of what is and isn't acceptable and tips on getting your questions answered.
Remember, everyone who comes here is a volunteer. At one point, they went to the forums looking for information. They liked it here and decided to stay and help other veterans. They share their personal experience, providing links to the law and reference materials and support because working on your claim can be exhausting and beyond frustrating.
This thread may still provide value to you and is worth at least skimming through the responses to see if any of them answer your question. Knowledge Is Power, and there is a lot of knowledge in older threads.
-
Ads
-
Ads
-
Our picks
-
VA Will No Longer Drop Coverage of Veterans Being Cared for at Home
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
NBC10’s Lucy Bustamante has details on the Department of Veterans Affairs making changes to its at-home care reevaluations.
-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Attorney Wants Diagnosis for Secondary Complication to Rated Condition; Must it be through VA?
Cat4Christ777 posted a question in IMO Independent Medical Opinion,
Originally, this secondary condition was claimed as 'migraines,' but while it may begin as a migraine with a complication, the VA can--and has, more than once--made it so much worse (pain-wise). If it does not qualify as a migraine, then my attorney and I need to come up with a different diagnosis. It's definitely a neurological issue, possibly 'occipital neuralgia,' as the condition meets the criteria of its definition, here: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/occipital+neuralgia.-
- 24 replies
-
-
VALife insurance program coming January 2023 for Veterans with service connection
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
In January 2023, VA will launch a new life insurance program called Veterans Affairs Life Insurance (VALife), which provides guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance coverage to Veterans age 80 and under, with any level of service-connected disability. Some Veterans age 81 and older may also be eligible.-
-
- 2 replies
-
-
I found this quiet Interesting supreme court decison
Buck52 posted a question in VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims Research Forum,
click the link to read about this.
https://usmilitary.org/supreme-court-decision-may-affect-veterans-across-the-us-wave-disability-deadline-for-thousands/
From the Article
-
-
- 33 replies
-
-
VA Math, Confusing, Right? Calculate Your Final Rating Percentage!
Tbird posted a blog entry in Tbirds Blog,
10 + 50 = 50 and other VA math mysteries explained.
VA Math It’s Not Your Mother’s Arithmetic
“VA Math” is the way that the VA computes combined impairment ratings for multiple conditions in a Veteran’s compensation benefits claim – and it requires that you unlearn real math. When a Veteran has multiple medical conditions that are service-connected and the Veterans Affairs rates each at a different percentage, it would seem that they should just add up your percentages to get to a total body impairment rating.-
- 4 replies
-
-
-
Ads
-
Popular Contributors
-
Ad
-
Latest News
Question
allan 10
From: Paul E. Travis [mailto:poppy0200@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:47 AM
Subject: FW: Two Articles in the Nov/Dec DAV Magazine
Subject: Two Articles in the Nov/Dec DAV Magazine
From: Legislative@USDR.ORG
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:27:03 -0500
Two Articles in the DAV Magazine for Nov-Dec
More Info
This message pertains to those of you who receive or have seen the DAV Magazine for Nov/Dec 2008. If you are not among those who have seen this magazine it can be found on line at http://www.dav.org/news/magazine/documents..._nov_dec_08.pdf There are two articles which can be rather confusing if you do not read closely and evaluate what is written. In part some of the confusion arises due to the lead time of printing, editing, and publishing, such that the text is not current in today's terms.
The first article "Pentagon Narrows Combat-Related Definition" is found on pages 10 and 11. If quickly read, it would appear that the Department of Defense has administratively changed the rules for all of CRSC (Combat Related Special Compensation) as intended by Congress. The truth is that DoD has administratively changed the rules but only for those separated for medical disability under Chapter 61 with less than 20 years of service and less than 30% combat related disability. There is no change in the rules for those Chapter 61 retirees with 30% or more medical disability.
The effect of this administrative change is that only those whose disability is directly due to combat in a war zone are eligible to have their severance pay restored under CRSC. Excluded are those whose combat-related disabilities are due to hazardous service, duty under conditions simulating combat, or due to an instrumentality out side of a combat zone.
The second article "Landmark Court Ruling Victory for Widows of Disabled Veterans" is found on page 20 and is correct as of the time "locked in print." This decision was handed down on Jun 2, 2008, by the US Court of Federal Claims, and has since been appealed by the Government with that appeal still pending. The basics of the lawsuit involve 3 widows who remarried after age 57 and were denied their SBP because they were receiving VA Dependency and Indemnity Compensation. This is not a class action lawsuit so in the short term only these three widows stand to benefit. At this time, it is not known as to what the SBP/DIC ramifications will be for the remaining 60,000 widows, unremarried or not, who are impacted by the SBP/DIC offset. However, if the Government appeal is denied, there is certainly precedent for the other widows to file a class action lawsuit to challenge the SBP/DIC offset as the Congress has failed to act on this matter.
To Unsubscribe: You may unsubscribe from our mailing list at any time by visiting here.
To ensure this email is delivered to your inbox, please add the email address Legislative@USDR.ORG to your address book or junk filter settings.
"Keep on, Keepin' on"
Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"
See my web site at:
http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Nov 13
1
Top Posters For This Question
allan 1 post
Popular Days
Nov 13 2008
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts