Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veteran Denied Benefits Because He Did Not Fight On Any War

Rate this question


emelita

Question

Since 2003, I have been claiming for my husband death pension as a US Veteran but always get denied. Last year I applied again as the person working at the Department of Veterans Affairs in Everett WA. told me that I am qualified to get a death pension. So he help me go through again those applications but again, I was denied, and now my case is going to DBA for a new hearing because I applied for this De NOVO Review as I gave a notice of disagreement.

My husband was in the army for more than two years but did not fight on the war in Vietnam, the actual war in the Republic of Vietnam, but he told me that he is the one making all the ammunition for the war in Vietnam. At that point of his service he did not go to war but the war is going on and the war have not been proclaimed yet, so his time of service did not fall on any days when they proclaimed the war in Vietnam and he did not go to war in the Republic of Vietnam as what the DVA govern. So he is not entitled to any death pension because he did not fight on any war even for one day, as the DVA said.

So now if the person is in the army and did not fight in the war he is not entitled to any death pension???

If your in the army you should fight in the war even for one day... or else no pension if you die or no other benefits to your dependents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

What were his service dates???

Edited by Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My husband serve in the army from January 1962 to 1964 of May. Served in Germany for 9 months and 10 days. DVA says he is supposed to serve in the Republic of Vietnam and fight the war even for one day between Feb 28 1962 to May 7 1975. He was not entitiled to any death pension as he did not fight to any war.

So even if your in the army for almost 20 years and no war your not entitiled to any pension or benefitsunless you fight on a war for one day.

======================================================

Since 2003, I have been claiming for my husband death pension as a US Veteran but always get denied. Last year I applied again as the person working at the Department of Veterans Affairs in Everett WA. told me that I am qualified to get a death pension. So he help me go through again those applications but again, I was denied, and now my case is going to DBA for a new hearing because I applied for this De NOVO Review as I gave a notice of disagreement.

My husband was in the army for more than two years but did not fight on the war in Vietnam, the actual war in the Republic of Vietnam, but he told me that he is the one making all the ammunition for the war in Vietnam. At that point of his service he did not go to war but the war is going on and the war have not been proclaimed yet, so his time of service did not fall on any days when they proclaimed the war in Vietnam and he did not go to war in the Republic of Vietnam as what the DVA govern. So he is not entitled to any death pension because he did not fight on any war even for one day, as the DVA said.

So now if the person is in the army and did not fight in the war he is not entitled to any death pension???

If your in the army you should fight in the war even for one day... or else no pension if you die or no other benefits to your dependents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

He only needs to have served on active duty anywhere, for one day, during the war period, not the actual combat (war). You should be entitled to the widows pension but a widows pension is means based, so it is offset by other income. It's kinda like welfare for service members and their families. For 2008 it looks like it'll pay $661 a month. Any other income you receive reduces that amount. If you already earn or receive more than $661 you'll get nothing.

Here's a link to the VA's site w/the answers: http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/pension/spousepen.htm#1

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He only needs to have served on active duty anywhere, for one day, during the war period, not the actual combat (war). You should be entitled to the widows pension but a widows pension is means based, so it is offset by other income. It's kinda like welfare for service members and their families. For 2008 it looks like it'll pay $661 a month. Any other income you receive reduces that amount. If you already earn or receive more than $661 you'll get nothing.

Here's a link to the VA's site w/the answers: http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/pension/spousepen.htm#1

pr

§ 3.17 Disability and death pension; Mexican border period and later war periods.

In computing the 90 days' service required for pension entitlement (see §3.3), there will be included active service which began before and extended into the Mexican border period or ended during World War I, or began or ended during World War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam era or the Persian Gulf War, if such service was continuous. Service during different war periods may be combined with service during any other war period to meet the 90 days' service requirement.

Only one of those days must have been served during a time of war and like Philip said, they don't have to have actually served or faught in the war zone, only during the time the war went on. But like Philip also stated, there is a means income test. If you are working or not, if you are receiving any type of finanacial earnings or assitance, it may be subtracted from the pension maximum or if it is more, then you become ineligible to receive it. However, their are exception that would reduce your means income, such as medical expenses you pay out of pocket.

If you need any other type of help, other than with the VA, If we knew what state you were in, there might be someone who is a member here that can direct you to other sources of help in your area/state. We also have a forum section that deals with Social Security questions and information.

Rockhound Rider :lol:

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this widow was denied because she states her husband served from January 1962 to May 1964 and the Vietnam War Era started on August 5,1964.

That puts his service outside the wartime period criteria.

The Vietnam War beginning was extending to February 28,1961 but only for incountry Vietnam Veterans.

I dont think this widow will be found eligible for a wartime VA pension-

Is there any chance at all for a direct SC death award of DIC?

Another thing about the pension- it is income limited- I got a pension award it seemed only a few weeks before my DIC award came and it was so little money it hardly seemed worth it-

and then in my C file is a formal withdrawal of the pension-with the VA's receipt of what looks like the first pension check I got.

DIC is a better benefit is possible.

I dont know how many widows once they get SSA benefits-can possibly get much of any VA wartime pension.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the widow gets SSA she will probably be ineligible for the widow's pension since it is need based. You have to be really poor to get it. I tried to get it for a widown but she made too much money, and was not even eligible due to her husband not even being a vet. He worked in a war industry at home and never even went to basic training during WWII.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use