Taking A Poll - Who Here Is At

[carlie]

I'm trying to get a count of who here has claims

CURRENTLY at: BVA - AMC - CAVC.

carlie has claims at:

1) BVA and remanded to

2) AMC

[broncovet]

I filed a NOD in March, 09. Since this Decision was ALREADY a DRO review, I did not think I could ask for a DRO review on a decision that was a Decision Officer Review. However, they sent me a letter and asked if I wanted a DRO review or BVA appeal. I thought about it and sent the form back and elected another DRO review, therefore, I guess my appeal is waiting DRO review.

Edited August 24, 2009 by broncovet

[Guest Ryan]

One in appeal with DRO, and one new one for a secondary for an existing sc not related to the appeal.

[scirc]

My claim is currently at the AMC.

Timeline:

Claimed - 07-2002 (denied)

NOD x3 - 10-2003 (denied)

Form 9 - 01-2006 (BVA)

Hearing - 03-2008

Remand - 06-2008 (AMC)

C&P comp 01-13-2009 (ready to rate 1/16/09)

As of today it's been sitting at the AMC

for 7-1/2 months waiting to be rated.

[deanbrt]

I just had mine remanded back from CAVC to the BVA. My attorney is getting his chunk for getting the remand but my guess is taht he will tell me I am on my own again. I wish I had an attorney I could trust. this is the second time it has been remanded.

[deanbrt]

I appealed to the BVA in 1998.

Claim finally denied by BVA on May 15, 2009 after repeated remands.

Hired attorney & spinal claims went to CAVC on June 15, 2009

Claims for MS, Chronic pain, etc that were held up in 2005 pending BVA decision, were filed at the VARO June 15, 2009.

My fear is that your attorney is like mine. He wants to find a way to get it remanded so he can get paid by the government and then will tell you that you are on your own again...

[jerrbilly]

My CUE for IU is at the RO. None of my claims have gone to BVA, even the NODs. All were decided at the RO level.

jerr