Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.
Question
Josephine
This paragraph constantly haunts me as to what this C&P examiner was
stating to the VA.
Entitlement to Individual Unemployability
Entitlement to individual unemployability is granted because the
claimant is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful
occupation as a result of service- connected disabilities.
Social Security Administration income statements show that you have
not worked since 1983.
Your VA examination, conducted at the VAMC August 22, 2008, showed
that you have been unable to work due to your severe anxiety.
The examiner noted that you would not be employable due to your panic attacks, anxiety,
and inneraction with customers and coworkers in a working
environment.
Based upon the opinion of the examiner, entitlement to individual
unemployability is granted effective April 12, 2005 to August 20,
2008, the date of you increase to 100 percent.
Now, my question is - Did the VA Examiner state I became unemployable
in 2005 or in 1983?
Remember the BVA Judge granted me service connected for chronic
anxiety back to 1992.
For 1992- 1997 I was granted 10%
1997 - 2005 grant of 50%
2005 - 2008 Umemployability
2008 100% P&T.
Thanks,
Betty
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
10
6
4
2
Popular Days
Dec 27
12
Dec 28
12
Dec 29
6
Top Posters For This Question
Josephine 10 posts
Philip Rogers 6 posts
Wings 4 posts
john999 2 posts
Popular Days
Dec 27 2008
12 posts
Dec 28 2008
12 posts
Dec 29 2008
6 posts
29 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now