Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

When Will The U.s. Government Kill The Last Vietnam Veteran?

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

When Will The U.S. Government Kill the Last Vietnam Veteran?

FOR 40 YEARS VIETNAM VETERANS HAVE BEEN TREATED AS PARIAHS BY "UNCLE SAM"

NEW VETS BEING USED AS AN EXCUSE TO ABUSE THE LAST SURVIVING VIETNAM VETS

By Gordon Duff, STAFF WRITER

When Vietnam veterans started coming home, legless, PTSD ridden and suicidal after having suffered higher casualty rates than any war in our history (Marines lost nearly as many dead in Vietnam as WW2 with 1/4 as many serving), they faced a VA managed by powerful service organizations with huge numbers of WW2 and Korean War veterans in control of policy making. Vietnam vets were denied membership in many of these groups and consistently were denied proper treatment for their wounds because of prejudices supported, in large part, by veterans themselves. Read Full Story

http://campaign.constantcontact.com:80/ren...fR6LDGJXwFNU%3D

Edited by allan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Allan, good post. I've noted for yrs VN vets dying at an early age. I'm 63 and figure I've already beat some of the odds. You can bet somewhere the insurance industry has the statistics on VN vets life expectancy but I haven't been able to find it yet. They, the Govt, lied to us but I'm still proud of my service. Actually I don't have much use for anyone who hasn't served. jmo

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang in their Philip- you are still YOUNG!

I agree that Vietnam vets are dying at alarming rates- I dont have any stats -the VA would know and we all kow how they deal with stats-

Even the widows of Vietnam vets are dying -with DIC claims in progress at the VA web site.

Only Nehmer Class Action widows claim have a right to Next of Kin survivorship criteria in the Nehmer COurt Order.

I was thinking of this when I woke up this AM_

I fully feel the "new" vets should get exempliary and fast claims processing- but what about everyone else?

Why is it that a vet -say 60 or over, with disabilities- does not have the same right to this expeditious treament as the new vets do?

(then again-one more way for VA to save money- if Korean and Vietnam vets and any other vets who are senior citizens have VA claims that can be strung out until they die)

This would be like when I raised livestock and gave selenium and tetanus shots only to my new borm lambs and said the heck with shots for the older sheep who had just as much value.

You men and women were all "new" vets some time ago- and many of you got diddly sqwat and have had claims filed and still in appeals long before the new vets did.

I sure honor our wonderful men and women in the Mil today and the "new" vets as the VA calls them- but where is the equity for ALL of you?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well put Berta. Even though the VA treats us better now than when they did, right after VN. It still took them about 15 yrs to start acknowledging any problems with VN Vets. Also, the stigma of being whiners, drug addicts and so forth, seems to still cling to our history.

T&B

" In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress"

- John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the 'new' Vet's have a short window of oportunity just as GW1 vets did. Going into the GW1 we were told we would not be treated as poor as vietnam vets, "the va has changed", is the quote. Because of media, it was somewhat true for a year after the little war.

Then it was back to business as usuall for the VA. GW illness was not real for fourteen years. We were and are called liars and malingerers. The word Malingering appears in my med records. Even after 14 years and the GW illness is real, there is no rating for it, most still don't believe it. You can be rated for symptoms only.

After the media storm for the 'new' vets, it will be business as usual for the VA. Deny treatment, deny bennifit's.

The seperation of old and new will be lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I filed claims in 1971 and got granted disabilities in 2006. Cancer kicked my ass and killed 7 Nam vets in one year in the town American Legion.

I will never forget or forgive the way we were literally spit at when we came to an airport back home. Or walked in a corner bar for a beer and no one even acted like we were there. None of us ever got a parade or rarely a welcome home.

We are a tight knit group though, the ones that are left. We know no war or conflict was any harder and more scary to fight in than our war. We also know that even at our older ages we would pick up an M16 again if asked.

I don`t look at Nam as a loss. You don`t lose a war when the body count was over 1 million killed and they killed 53000 of us.

Cavman

Edited by Cavman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use