Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Amc Rebuttal By Wings



Edited by Wings

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts


Sorry about that. I missed the original post or I would have tried to give it a once over at least. With a law enforcement background I am usually pretty good with legalise. When you repost I will try to give it a check.


Edited by mitchell3006

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wings, as I responded to you, I feel it is "most excellent," however I didn't confirm the citations. My personal feeling is that the AMC will just refer it back to the BVA, as it's to "legalese" for the AMC. I feel the only time the file is completely reviewed is at the BVA and in your case, most would be overwhelmed by your expertise. BTW, being a perfectionist, everytime you read it you will find room for improvement. Sometimes ya just gotta let go. I feel it's an absolute winner and I'd request TDIU back to the original date of claim or day following discharge, if claim was within one yr, which if I recall correctly it was. jmo


PR Thanks, I was thinking along the same lines: changing the ISSUE from EED to TDIU, but it's gonna take some thought! They've given me 30 days for the Rebuttal, and since it was sent 1-13-09, I haven't much time! The more I write, the more they have to read, and I know they really don't like to read our appeals LOL! HUGS!! ~Wings

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Berta Wrote, Jan 29 2009,

Wings-I read the original post you had here but wanted to print it off and re-read it- and then I couldnt find it-except for a deleted post. I thought it was very well prepared and it made sense! I too used VA legalise in my response to the AMC. But many of us have prepared our stuff well and still the VA misinterprets our responses.

In my response to AMC, I Captioned it as in Three Parts:

Part I. I focused on the fact that the BVA had noted the VA had not considered any of my medical evidence-and I enclosed much of it again-and even some additional stuff they might have lost.(I scanned and inserted that part of the actual remand);

Part II. I used in legal citations etc to support my claim under a legal argument.

Part III. I referred to the Nehmer decision in case I die before award, they have to award my beneficiary part of the offset award so I gave contact info.

But it took me some time to determine how to shape the response I made-I wrote it 3 or 4 times and I know this is what you are looking for - the best format possible to get them to comprehend your points.

I still believe Page One of anything to VA, or the BVA or the I-9 or the AMC should state what you want from them and directly refer to the evidence-by identifying it on the first page; and after that, expanding on it within the rest of the response.

My AMC response started right off the bat with: "The VA failed to consider ANY of my medical evidence in the past 5 years and 9 months since filing this claim."

I then referred them to the Exhibits enclosed of this evidence. Just in case it suddenly was missing. And to the BVA statement that it had never been addressed yet. I also asked for expeditious treatment. I managed to get this all on the first response page.

My response to VARO on my CUE claims was the same statement except it was legal and not medical evidence.

I had listed the evidence right on the DRO Election form and then referred to that legal evidence again.

Whether CUE or regular claim, I think that first page is critical when we prepare it:

It should contain what we claim (that CUE was made, or disability rating, or TDIU, etc.), and then right away state WHY we are entitled to a favorable outcome of the CUE or why the disability claim should be awarded and why their decision is wrong. And then expand in additional pages.

I will certainly read anything you post here on the rebuttal you are making.

What we want and why they are wrong, and then WHY we should be awarded the claim-

not always easy to condense into the first page but worth trying to get it there and expanding on it in the additional pages.



Berta, I agree with you 100%!! I don't know how to condence this argument into a paragraph. I don't know how to ask for what I want, because I don't know the llaw can support it. Let me work on this for a couple of hours, and post it for some feedback. I do need Hadit's help now, and I appreciate your advice! ~Wings over and out!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

wings i think you are a lady and a scholar!!!!!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
wings i think you are a lady and a scholar!!!!!!

Thank you, Sir Skunk ;-)

You have your heart and your backbone, right where they need to be.

Keep on keeping on!! ~Wings

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.


      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.

      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.

      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law

      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual

      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures

      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation

      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.


      The report is here:


      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.



      • 0 replies
    • I just received a deposit to my checking account. The description says VALG TREAS 310 TYPE: XXVA.
      I'm not sure who to ask about this deposit. I am concerned because I was not notified I would be receiving it.
      I retired from the Marines in 1997 with 10% disability. I've been receiving a separate disability payment from my regular retirement pay. This deposit is completely unexpected. thank you for any insight.
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines