Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need A Us Court Attorney

Rate this question


dav_marine72

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Anyone know of a good attorney at the court that takes their cut from the government reimbursement? My first lawyer was working under that premise. Someone had posted attorney Robert Chisholm as a good lawyer but he wants a $1500 fee and 25% of my back pay. This is such BS. The VA screws up and I have to pay for it? Please let me know if anyone used a decent lawyer that did not charge. Thanks.

Edited by Pete53

USMC 1st Battalion 1st Marines 1st Marine Division 91-95

100% P&T

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."

George Washington

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

The CAVC web site has a list of lawyers who can practice before the court:

http://www.vetapp.gov/practitioners/

What is the 1500 bucks for-does he intend to pay for an IMO for your claim?

http://www.vetsprobono.org/ this is a link to free (pro bono) lawyers who handle CAVC cases.

I am working with a pro bono lawyer for a CAVC case- that is- I assessed the case as best as I could -

lawyers dont win cases-evidence does.

By the time a claim gets to the CAVC, the CAVC will only remand or grant if the BVA made errors so significant, it could impact on the case.

In the case a lawyer contacted me on,the veteran's evidence was highly questionable to the BVA but I did find a possible

VCAA violation that could cause a remand and therefore possibly set the stage for the veteran to submit more evidence or clarify his nexus situation.

The court makes it's decision on the record before the BVA at the time the BVA made their decision.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi Berta,

Thanks as always. He told me because I am so far along he would have to stop working on other client and bump me up. Hence the $1500. I dont have that to pay. Then 10+ years of fighting to lose 25%. I have to have a three level lumbar fusion on March 12. How much more does the VA need to put at more than 20% ortho and 10% neuro? I am pissed!

USMC 1st Battalion 1st Marines 1st Marine Division 91-95

100% P&T

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."

George Washington

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your status. Sounds like this guy is trying to pull a fast one. Have spoke to one attorney in Il and her firm take pro bono then she gets 20% of the award you get plus fees too...I have been doing it alone and told her my case was at BVA now...had a free consult, and I was more familiar with the protocol than she was...but I have been working on this over 5 yrs and she just 1 yr helping vets. She was nice and very willing to help.

No up front $ gets nothing if you don't win though. I know what you mean about giving someone mucho $ when you do years worth of work...but down the road there may be a time their services will be needed and 20% plus fees is better than me getting nothing.

Check watchdog.org they have info about some good attorneys. Good luck dude.

Anyone know of a good attorney at the court that takes their cut from the government reimbursement? My first lawyer was working under that premise. Someone had posted attorney Robert Chisholm as a good lawyer but he wants a $1500 fee and 25% of my back pay. This is such bullshit. The VA fucks up and I have to pay for it? Please let me know if anyone used a decent lawyer that did not charge. Thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'm kind of shocked with this 20% - 25% stuff. My original lawyer was getting reimbursed from the government with no out of pocket cost to me at all. No percentage of my back pay. Did I have the nicest attorney in the world and now I'm screwed?

USMC 1st Battalion 1st Marines 1st Marine Division 91-95

100% P&T

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."

George Washington

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I recommended Robert Chisholm. He did my CAVC appeal and won a remand. There was no cash award so he was paid under the EAJA and I didn't need to pay anything.

Berta is right. Once it's assigned to the CAVC there can be no more evidence added. The case is decided on the evidence of record.

I don't know why he requested $1500, plus the percentage but I do want to make a point. He's entitled to be paid. I've used lawyers before and usually have had them take a percentage. That's how they work. Why should you get free services?

pr

Anyone know of a good attorney at the court that takes their cut from the government reimbursement? My first lawyer was working under that premise. Someone had posted attorney Robert Chisholm as a good lawyer but he wants a $1500 fee and 25% of my back pay. This is such bullshit. The VA fucks up and I have to pay for it? Please let me know if anyone used a decent lawyer that did not charge. Thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

First off let me start off by saying lawyers do have a right to be paid, no one is disputing that fact. The fact is at this point we are talking about a lawyer looking through my case and then negotiating with the U.S. attorney. I know there is work behind the scenes but if that is worth around the $12500 estimate on my case there is something wrong with that. The fact that you are accusing me of wanting something for nothing is an insult. I have been fighting the VA since 2000 for my benefits. I have provided all the evidence needed to get a 90% rating. Right now I am 70%. Rather than site home and try to get TDIU and social security I go to work everyday under a cocktail of sedatives, anti-depressants, and pain killers. I can't get life insurance to protect my wife and children because of my service connected disabilities.

So yes I don't believe a lawyer should get $12k of my 50k when my evidence points I should have been that way in the first place. This attorney you are so high on wanted to charge me $1250 because he would have to work on my case in front of other clients because I am already at the court and have been there for some time. How does that help his clients? There are many lawyers who do these cases for the fees they can get reuimburshed from the government. Why should I have to pay a laywer when the VA screwed up? I'm scheduled for a service connected three level lumbar fusion in March in which my employer is saying if you can't make it back in 6 weeks then find another job. Don't make judgements about people or situations you don't know about.

USMC 1st Battalion 1st Marines 1st Marine Division 91-95

100% P&T

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."

George Washington

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use