Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Increase Claim Denied

Rate this question


Charleese

Question

Hi Everyone,

Posted here the other day about Hartford Regional Office. Well Berta gave us a number and person to call and my husband did. Even though that person didn't call him back he received and e-mail from IRIS stating that Notification was mailed on yesterday. Today we received his decision and everything has been denied. Needless to say my husband is livid over this. They kept this claim for 22 months to deny everything. He has a brace that the VA has given him for his left knee servicer connected condition, which would give him and increase of another 10%. Decision is states "A higher evaluation is not warranted because these findings are not currently shown." As stated above he has a brace that the VA gave him, also at last C&P exam, Doctor changed the originally brace, to the brace that he has now, which is a better brace. Also, my husband gets a clothing allowance because of the wearing of this brace. This was documented in his application for an increase. No where in this Decision does it state that the C&P Doctor states that his condition has gotten worse and he needs a knee replacement and that he is unemployable. Everything he applied for: Right Knee, Left & Right Shoulder, Diabbetes, Hypertension, Bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, cholsesterol, Gout, and ED were all denied. He gave them ample amount of evidence to prove these conditions, which are conditions that the VA treats him for, as well as private doctors, but they still denied him stating that they didn't occur in the service. My husband stated in his application for increase that his right knee has deteroriated as a result of him compensating for his left knee. Even C&P Doctor agreed with him on this. He has Osteoarthritis/Arthritis/Degenerative Joint Disese in his left & right knee, left & right shoulder. Also, the fact that he stated and attached an Article which states: "In fact, most studies now strongly suggest that carpal tunnel syndrome is primarily associated with medical or physical conditions, such as diabetes, osteoarthritis, etc. My husband has diabetes and is obese. Conditions that can lead to secondary osteoarthritis include obese, repeated trauma or surgery to joint structures,(husband was always falling because knee would lock up on him), gout, diabetes, and other harmone disorders. He let them know that because he was obese, and have stress and pain from left knee injury,high cholestero, hypertension he associated all with his diabetes. They denied all because they say he didn't have when he was in the service. For them to deny him ED because they said it did not happen when he was in the service, is a little bit too much, when they are the ones supplying him with medication for it. Decision goes on to state: You walk with a walker and cane for better weight balance." If they had read his c-file then they would of known that my husband fell last July and injured his whole right side, and because of that fall doctors discovered his spinal chord was damaged and he had a herinated disc wrap around his spinal chord. He had major surgery and had to be operated on immediately. He stayed in the hospital for 40 days. He gave VA a copy of his medical records pertaining to this fall. The surgeon doctor that attended him has writtern a letter stating that he is Permanent and Totally disable and cannot work at that job anymore.

I intend to help him NOD this decision. We are going Monday, to get a copy of his last C&P exam to see exactly what Doctor put in that report. If she didn't put in report about knee replacement and unemployable, then we will write her and ask her why. We also intend to use surgeon's letter as well.

What I need to know is how do we get them to look at all info in his c-file, and all evidence we send them. They overlooked about him having a Brace etc. and didn't report about what C&P Doctor said.

The person who did this claim is the one we made a complaint about through IRIS and I guess this is her way of retailiating by denying everything. How do we prove that all disabilities does not originate in the service, but can happen over periods of times from service connected injuries.

Please help us. Sorry for long Po0st.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

goodmorning, iam not too good at this typing stuff i read all these post all the time l and learn alotmy i say DIDO<DIDO mysc is for back , me and your hubby sound like twins but ihave documents stating i was obese in the army,344pd know 2yrs after 14meds and40%later and too get turndown it is a crying shame that a vet has too be treated like this,my wife dont understand this could happen tous vets, god bless america;and our wifes also. :angry:

rayray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"What I need to know is how do we get them to look at all info in his c-file, and all evidence we send them"

Does he have a vet rep or service officer?

I feel he should file for a reconsideration - however this does NOT stop the NOD clock.

With the support of a good rep (one who as an office in or near the VARO) the reconsideration request might draw out the evidence better.

TDIU-VA will NOT consider TDIU until the vet's SC is 70%-that is why we MUST apply for TDIU ourselves.

There is a lot there you can attack in the NOD or Reconsideration Request.

Some of this -however- I do not understand-

"He gave them ample amount of evidence to prove these conditions, which are conditions that the VA treats him for, as well as private doctors, but they still denied him stating that they didn't occur in the service. "

Are they in his SMRS? and/or listed on his discharge physical?

Are any of them presumptive? such as the diabetes- was he an incountry veteran?

"How do we prove that all disabilities does not originate in the service, but can happen over periods of times from service connected injuries."

That will take a strong independent medical opinion by a real doctor who can access every SMR and medical record available and rovide a complete medical rationale for the inservice nexus to disabilities your husband has now.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

Berta to answer your questions:

1. No he does not have a vet rep or service officer. I have been doing the NODs, etc. for him and because I got him the 60% rating he does not want no one else to work his case.

2. Decisions states: "You have one year from the date of this letter to appeal the decision." If I was to do the Reconsideration for him and they don't act upon it within a certain time period can a NOD be done also?

3. I am confused when you say: "TDIU-VA will NOT consider TDIU until the vet's SC is 70%-that is why we MUST apply for TDIU ourselves." Our you saying that because he is 60% now that I should apply for TDIU now or should I wait till he becomes 70%? I don't understand. I believe he can get the 70% once we file for Reconsideration or NOD because the person who did his claim refuse to look at Application for Annual Clothing Allowance that was attached to Application for increase dated 5/28/07 which stated that he had a knee brace from VA that was given to him on 1/17/07. Since applying he gets a clothing allowance each year. Clothing allowances are for veterans who use or wear a prosthetic or orthopedic appliance (artificial limb, braces, or wheelchair) or use prescribed medications for skin condition, which tend to wear, tear or soil clothing. Its all in his file and the attachment that was submitted to increase application. Their bases for denying the brace is: "A higher evaluation of 40 percent is not warranted for the left knee osteoarthritic changes and chronic chondromalacia because evidence fails to show that a brace is required because of nonunion and loose motion of the left knee. If its not required then why did fit him for one, plus at last C&P exam they change brace and gave him a better one. Once again do I have to wait for him to get 70% or can I file now at 60%. Especially if we find that C&P states that he needs a knee replacement and is unemployable.

4. His SMRs were burned up in the fire in St. Louis. We had to send directly to Lackland AF base to get his medical records about his knee injury because VA would not do it. In 1983 when he got it and submitted it they still denied him and had to NOD to get them to accept these records. Once they accepted it they gave him a 0% rating. It was only until 2000 when we filed for an increase did they give him 10%, then NODed and they gave him 20%. In 2003 they called CUE on themselves and gave him the 60% (30% recurrent subluxation, left knee and 30% status post fracture left tibial tubercle with osteoarthritic changes and chronic chondromalacia. In this decision they have now added after chronic chondromalacia and left thigh atrophy stating: "A separate evaluation is not warraanted for the left thigh atrophy because this condition is considered part of the left knee disorder. There is no evidence of a disability associated with the left thigh atrophy."

5. By in country if you mean was he in Viet Nam, no. He was in the Korean War from 1954-1958.

6. The problem is he doesn't have many medical service records because of his SMRs being burnt. The only records we have is his treatment records from VA and private doctors and to get a good IMO would be costly and that's something we can't afford at this time.

Therefore, I will just have to do the best that I can for him and with God's help and the help with people like you and other hadit people I believe we will prevail. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they dont act upon the Reconsideration Request the NOD should be filed within that year.

I fiked recon request but marked my calendar and was able to file th NOD in time as they never acted on the Recon request.

Records destroyed in the St Louis Fire-

I have a vet's file here that contains records (SMRS) destroyed in the St Louis Fire.

His Rep asked me to help with the claim.

VA had sent only 2 SMR sheets and said the rest had been destroyed in the fire.

I looked at the SMrs and asked the rep where the watermarks and charring was on them????? DUH-firemen dont save 2 documents at a time.

I had the vet send the SF 180 in himself.

I still have his complete unburned SMRS here.

You should double check on his SMRs yourself- a SF 180 can be filled out and sent at the NARA web site.

Without inservice proof suvch as SMRs or buddy statements -the VA will not grant these claims that reply on the SMRs after Lackland.

How has he done as far as attempting to reach any corpmen or buddies in service, or even his CO-to get an eye witness account of whatever caused his disability or that he was symptomatic of the disability in service?

Lackland is where my daughter graduated. (USAF)I would imagine he was not there that long to have too many SMRS from Basic training-

but why would these be available at Lackland AFB and not at NARA? it is worth a shot to try to get the SMRS directly from NARA.

Everytime the VA sees USAF they figure we can deny and say the records were lost in the fire. It is BS.

I know a local vet who -I just screamed when I read his decision-

VA said his USAF SMRS were burned in the St Louis Fire.

He had enlisted YEARS after the St Louis FIre. I was delighted to prepare a sarcastic NOD to the VA for him-suggesting how illiterate they truly can be.

He won his claim based on the SMRs which he got from NARA himself.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

Can someone or anyone answered these questions for me:

1. I am confused when you say: "TDIU-VA will NOT consider TDIU until the vet's SC is 70%-that is why we MUST apply for TDIU ourselves." Our you saying that because he is 60% now that I should apply for TDIU now or should I wait till he becomes 70%? I don't understand. I believe he can get the 70% once we file for Reconsideration or NOD because the person who did his claim refuse to look at Application for Annual Clothing Allowance that was attached to Application for increase dated 5/28/07 which stated that he had a knee brace from VA that was given to him on 1/17/07. Since applying he gets a clothing allowance each year. Clothing allowances are for veterans who use or wear a prosthetic or orthopedic appliance (artificial limb, braces, or wheelchair) or use prescribed medications for skin condition, which tend to wear, tear or soil clothing. Its all in his file and the attachment that was submitted to increase application. Their bases for denying the brace is: "A higher evaluation of 40 percent is not warranted for the left knee osteoarthritic changes and chronic chondromalacia because evidence fails to show that a brace is required because of nonunion and loose motion of the left knee. If its not required then why did fit him for one, plus at last C&P exam they change brace and gave him a better one. Once again do I have to wait for him to get 70% or can I file now at 60%. Especially if we find that C&P states that he needs a knee replacement and is unemployable.

2. Is veterans who served in Viet Nam and the ones who had diabetes in service, are they the only ones who can claim Diabetes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you feel a NOD or reconsideration request will get him to 70% then just wait for that decision and they will send him the TDIU form.

My point here is that once TDIU form is filed by the vet or sent and then rated by the VA-it is the date of the TDIU form that becomes the usual award date.

A vet could be medically TDIU in 2003 by medical evidence and by 2006 the VARO still has not raised him or her to 70%- they then might do that and send the TDIU form out-

If medical evidence warrants the vet as being TDIU as of 2003- in this case- the vet has lost years of TDIU compensation, waiting for the VA to take them up to 70% when their evidence could warrant a TDIU form they file themselves much sooner than that.

Maybe my post was too strong- not MUST-

SHOULD

If a vet doesnt want to file the TDIU form themselves and wants to wait for the VA to send them one -so be it.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use