Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Increase Claim Denied

Rate this question


Charleese

Question

Hi Everyone,

Posted here the other day about Hartford Regional Office. Well Berta gave us a number and person to call and my husband did. Even though that person didn't call him back he received and e-mail from IRIS stating that Notification was mailed on yesterday. Today we received his decision and everything has been denied. Needless to say my husband is livid over this. They kept this claim for 22 months to deny everything. He has a brace that the VA has given him for his left knee servicer connected condition, which would give him and increase of another 10%. Decision is states "A higher evaluation is not warranted because these findings are not currently shown." As stated above he has a brace that the VA gave him, also at last C&P exam, Doctor changed the originally brace, to the brace that he has now, which is a better brace. Also, my husband gets a clothing allowance because of the wearing of this brace. This was documented in his application for an increase. No where in this Decision does it state that the C&P Doctor states that his condition has gotten worse and he needs a knee replacement and that he is unemployable. Everything he applied for: Right Knee, Left & Right Shoulder, Diabbetes, Hypertension, Bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, cholsesterol, Gout, and ED were all denied. He gave them ample amount of evidence to prove these conditions, which are conditions that the VA treats him for, as well as private doctors, but they still denied him stating that they didn't occur in the service. My husband stated in his application for increase that his right knee has deteroriated as a result of him compensating for his left knee. Even C&P Doctor agreed with him on this. He has Osteoarthritis/Arthritis/Degenerative Joint Disese in his left & right knee, left & right shoulder. Also, the fact that he stated and attached an Article which states: "In fact, most studies now strongly suggest that carpal tunnel syndrome is primarily associated with medical or physical conditions, such as diabetes, osteoarthritis, etc. My husband has diabetes and is obese. Conditions that can lead to secondary osteoarthritis include obese, repeated trauma or surgery to joint structures,(husband was always falling because knee would lock up on him), gout, diabetes, and other harmone disorders. He let them know that because he was obese, and have stress and pain from left knee injury,high cholestero, hypertension he associated all with his diabetes. They denied all because they say he didn't have when he was in the service. For them to deny him ED because they said it did not happen when he was in the service, is a little bit too much, when they are the ones supplying him with medication for it. Decision goes on to state: You walk with a walker and cane for better weight balance." If they had read his c-file then they would of known that my husband fell last July and injured his whole right side, and because of that fall doctors discovered his spinal chord was damaged and he had a herinated disc wrap around his spinal chord. He had major surgery and had to be operated on immediately. He stayed in the hospital for 40 days. He gave VA a copy of his medical records pertaining to this fall. The surgeon doctor that attended him has writtern a letter stating that he is Permanent and Totally disable and cannot work at that job anymore.

I intend to help him NOD this decision. We are going Monday, to get a copy of his last C&P exam to see exactly what Doctor put in that report. If she didn't put in report about knee replacement and unemployable, then we will write her and ask her why. We also intend to use surgeon's letter as well.

What I need to know is how do we get them to look at all info in his c-file, and all evidence we send them. They overlooked about him having a Brace etc. and didn't report about what C&P Doctor said.

The person who did this claim is the one we made a complaint about through IRIS and I guess this is her way of retailiating by denying everything. How do we prove that all disabilities does not originate in the service, but can happen over periods of times from service connected injuries.

Please help us. Sorry for long Po0st.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If a Veteran has diabetes in service or can prove a link to service they can be service connected for diabetes.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Regards SMRs from St Louis, true, many documents were completely destroyed, but many have 'remanants'. Applied for my fathers records a few times over the years. Once or twice got 'destroyed in fire' statement. Saw somewhere on the internet genealogy site, that they recieved some documents when asking 'specifically' for all records associated with a persons military service, asking for personnel records, medical records, entry records, deployment records.

Worked for me too, NARA sent me feedback offering copies for purchase of what they did have on hand, even if not legible or complete. So with a couple of relatives we wanted information on their military involvement. What a goldmine!, the money was small in regards to the information we recieved from the half burnt copies, watermarked and very old difficult to read documents. I believe they microfiched them and have awesome copiers. Just a gamble, but very interesting to define anything and everything we could get our paws on, even though there were no guarantees is all.

Best to ya,

Cowgirl'up2009!

Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If medical evidence warrants the vet as being TDIU as of 2003- in this case- the vet has lost years of TDIU compensation, waiting for the VA to take them up to 70% when their evidence could warrant a TDIU form they file themselves much sooner than that.

Maybe my post was too strong- not MUST-

SHOULD

If a vet doesnt want to file the TDIU form themselves and wants to wait for the VA to send them one -so be it.

I filed my TDIU claim along with everything else back in 2005/2006, when I first stumbled upon hadit. I like many others, would snoop around for info and that was about it. I remember reading a post by Berta that suggested filing the TDIU form even if you are at 0%. Well, I did just that...so guess what...yep...because my conditions were backdated...my TDIU claim will also be backdated. Good advice, is all I'm saying!!! :)

Edited by luvHIM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Luvhim-in the past 7 years other vets here have also followed my advise on that and got TDIU with the best EED they could get.

I advise attaching the 21-8940 form to any NOD too if the evidence could generate a TDIU award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hi Everyone,

Posted here the other day about Hartford Regional Office. Well Berta gave us a number and person to call and my husband did. Even though that person didn't call him back he received and e-mail from IRIS stating that Notification was mailed on yesterday. Today we received his decision and everything has been denied. Needless to say my husband is livid over this. They kept this claim for 22 months to deny everything. He has a brace that the VA has given him for his left knee servicer connected condition, which would give him and increase of another 10%. Decision is states "A higher evaluation is not warranted because these findings are not currently shown." As stated above he has a brace that the VA gave him, also at last C&P exam, Doctor changed the originally brace, to the brace that he has now, which is a better brace. Also, my husband gets a clothing allowance because of the wearing of this brace. This was documented in his application for an increase. No where in this Decision does it state that the C&P Doctor states that his condition has gotten worse and he needs a knee replacement and that he is unemployable. Everything he applied for: Right Knee, Left & Right Shoulder, Diabbetes, Hypertension, Bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, cholsesterol, Gout, and ED were all denied. He gave them ample amount of evidence to prove these conditions, which are conditions that the VA treats him for, as well as private doctors, but they still denied him stating that they didn't occur in the service. My husband stated in his application for increase that his right knee has deteroriated as a result of him compensating for his left knee. Even C&P Doctor agreed with him on this. He has Osteoarthritis/Arthritis/Degenerative Joint Disese in his left & right knee, left & right shoulder. Also, the fact that he stated and attached an Article which states: "In fact, most studies now strongly suggest that carpal tunnel syndrome is primarily associated with medical or physical conditions, such as diabetes, osteoarthritis, etc. My husband has diabetes and is obese. Conditions that can lead to secondary osteoarthritis include obese, repeated trauma or surgery to joint structures,(husband was always falling because knee would lock up on him), gout, diabetes, and other harmone disorders. He let them know that because he was obese, and have stress and pain from left knee injury,high cholestero, hypertension he associated all with his diabetes. They denied all because they say he didn't have when he was in the service. For them to deny him ED because they said it did not happen when he was in the service, is a little bit too much, when they are the ones supplying him with medication for it. Decision goes on to state: You walk with a walker and cane for better weight balance." If they had read his c-file then they would of known that my husband fell last July and injured his whole right side, and because of that fall doctors discovered his spinal chord was damaged and he had a herinated disc wrap around his spinal chord. He had major surgery and had to be operated on immediately. He stayed in the hospital for 40 days. He gave VA a copy of his medical records pertaining to this fall. The surgeon doctor that attended him has writtern a letter stating that he is Permanent and Totally disable and cannot work at that job anymore.

I intend to help him NOD this decision. We are going Monday, to get a copy of his last C&P exam to see exactly what Doctor put in that report. If she didn't put in report about knee replacement and unemployable, then we will write her and ask her why. We also intend to use surgeon's letter as well.

What I need to know is how do we get them to look at all info in his c-file, and all evidence we send them. They overlooked about him having a Brace etc. and didn't report about what C&P Doctor said.

The person who did this claim is the one we made a complaint about through IRIS and I guess this is her way of retailiating by denying everything. How do we prove that all disabilities does not originate in the service, but can happen over periods of times from service connected injuries.

Please help us. Sorry for long Po0st.

Thanks

It sounds like V.A. has denied service connection for all your husband's disabilities. I suggest that your husband should get some help on his appeal from a service officer at the service organization representing your husband on his claim. If he doesn't have a service officer representing him he needs to appoint the Disabled American Veterans or another service organization to represent him and to help him with his appeal. Someone knowledgable needs to review his service records to determine whether there is any evidence in the service records that these disabilities were incurred or aggravated in service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

My husband has 20 vet friends who had used Disabled American Vets and various Service Organizations in our area and have gotten nowhere with them. It seems that once these organizations get them sc they drop them. They won't put in increases for them, they won't even return their calls. His friends have told him to stay away from these organizations. He said he rather take his chances with us doing it then them. I know this is an up hill battle, but with the Lord's help, I know he will get us through this. Thanks for your reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use