Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Exam

Rate this question


Charleese

Question

Hi everyone,

Today, my husband and I went to his RO and got a copy of his C&P exam for his sc left knee condition. That was an espisoe in itself, which I will comment on in another thread. As many of you know, his claim for increase for left knee condition was denied in its entirety, and at his exam Doctor told him he needed a Full Knee Replacement and he was now unemployable. In Decision to deny him there is no mentioned of full knee replacement, nor about him being unemployable.

C&P exam Assessment: Osteoarthritis of the left knee with significant loss of joint space and a genu valgus deformity as noted on the exam. He has atrophy of both thigh muscles as a result of limited range of motion and he has had a recent fall that is at least as likely as not the result of the weakness and locking of the left knee. This fall was significant, as it resulted in a herniated cervical disc requiring fusion and discectomy as stated aove. As a result, he has moderate to severe functional loss and limitations. The veteran should consider a total knee replacement, given the extent of his severe osteoarthritis and limitation in his ADLs.

My question: Shouldn't osteoarthritis be rated separately as secondary to his left knee condition and atrophy of left thigh muscle secondary to his left knee disorder, also be rated separately as well? RO decision states: "you submitted a claim for increased evaluation of your left knee osteoarthritic changes and chronic chondromalacia as well as a claim for service connection for left thigh atrophy. A separate evaluation is not warranted for the left thigh atrophy because this condition is considered part of the left knee disorder. There is no evidence of a disability associated with the left thigh atrophy. The examiner related the atrophy of the thigh to the left knee disability (examiner related both thighs to left knee disorder). However, C&P exam states: Atrophy of oth thigh muscles - He has a 10-degree genu valgus deformity of the left knee and a 5 degree genu varus on the right side. There is bilateral atrophy of the right and left thigs with the left thigh measurin 48 cmknee circumference and 53 cm on the right.

My question: How can decision say separate evaluation is not warranted for left thigh atrophy because there is no evidence of a disability associated with the left thigh atrophy. Isn''t my left knee disorder the disabiity that's associated with the left thigh atrophy as examiner has said in C&P exam. Am I missing something here, please tell me. How can he get this rated separately? Now that both thighs have been associated with his left knee disorder, we will put in claim for that as well.

C&P exam states: The veteran retired in 1995 and he does not work, so occupation does impact his service-connection. My husband did work but it was part time she is speaking of when he last worked full time. She did not use ther word unemployable in her exam report, even though she stated "occupation does impact his servife-connection"..My husband was working part-time when his left knee gave and he lost his balance on the pavement. He never filed a claim with VA for this. He used his job insurance that he paid for himself to pay for hospital and doctors bills. He is still under doctors care for this fall and goes to therapy 2 times a week for it. His doctor has said he cannot go back to that job anymore stating that he is Totally Permanent and Disable to do that job.

My question: Should we claim this with VA or not, since C&P doctor said that his fall is as least as likely as not the result of his left knee disorder? Will the fact that he was working and used his insurance to pay for operation, etc. hurt him. If he claims this will it increase his rating or would they said this is just part of left knee injury 30%.

My question: Should we file for TDIU now, since he is 60% and attach C&P exam stating that left knee is cause of him falling,as well as Letter from doctor stating he can no longer work his job because of fall.

Please, please answer the questions thats outlined in this topic.

Thanks!

Edited by Charleese
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Carlie,

He has more going on besides knee condition. Diabetes, Hypertension, bilateral carpal tunnel, Hypertensive heart disease, gout, right knee condition, etc.

He asked for an increase on these items, but was denied. We intend to appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"My question: Should we file for TDIU now, since he is 60% and attach C&P exam stating that left knee is cause of him falling,as well as Letter from doctor stating he can no longer work his job because of fall."

Yes-if he is still not employed due to the SC knee -apply for TDIU.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use