Daneman V. Brown, No. 95-868 (u.s. Vet. App. Sept. 28, 1995)

[allan]

I'm having trouble locating the whole case. Can someone post the case & link to source if availble?

Thanks in advance.

................................................................................

.....................................

Daneman v. Brown, No. 95-868 (U.S. Vet. App. Sept. 28, 1995)

(single-judge nonprecedential order) (On September 8, 1995, the petitioner filed a petition for extraordinary relief asking the Court to "expedite a lawful decision in his case" by ordering the case returned to the Board for prompt adjudication based on a complete and accurate claims file. In denying the petitioner's motion for extraordinary relief in the nature of mandamus, the Court observes that, according to the petitioner's allegations, it appears that the Board acted expeditiously to refer his claim to the VA regional office (RO) for further development, and that the RO is proceeding with the adjudication of the petitioner's claim. The allegations concede, in effect, that there is no "refusal to act," nor is there an indication that either the RO or the Board has acted or is acting with bad faith or unreasonably in this matter. "The Court notes that there is a heavy workload at the BVA and the RO. It would be most unwise and injudicious for this Court to intervene and establish priorities and micromanage the caseload of the RO. That is, in effect, what is being requested by the petitioner. His request for an expedited adjudication of his claim necessarily requires that claims of others, who have perhaps waited longer for an adjudication of their claims, be delayed.")

[Philip Rogers]

Allan, I tried but the new CAVC (COVA) website isn't that friendly to dummies like me. Sorry but no luck. Someone will chime in. Maybe Wings, she's like the best researcher I've ever met. If she can't find it, it ain't there. jmo

pr

[carlie]

allan,

I got as far as multiple years for single judge decisions

and it say's 1995 & 1996 n/a (not available).

carlie

[allan]

Thanks for trying.

Not available is all I could find up as well.

Out of all the cases, i'm curious why this one has been pulled from the lists.

[Pete53]

Veteran probably won his claim or died