Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ftca- State Where Medmal Occurred Or Where Claimant Lives?

Rate this question


Judy

Question

Is FTCA claim cap $$ limit based on the state limits where the malpractice occurred OR

on the state where the claimant resides when they file the FTCA claim?

Anybody know where to find a list of state caps??

Judy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Interesting question, Judy. I would think that state law would have nothing to do with it because VAMC's are on federal property and state laws shouldn't apply. I would think the FTCA claim would be filed w/that VA's general counsel or in the local Federal court. Someone who's had one should respond soon.

pr

Is FTCA claim cap $$ limit based on the state limits where the malpractice occurred OR

on the state where the claimant resides when they file the FTCA claim?

Anybody know where to find a list of state caps??

Judy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State caps control any out of court FTCA settlements-

The home page of your state will have Attorney General office or a referral to their legal dept and this is how I found NY state cap.

I am sure the jurisdiction for the state cap lies where the malpractice occurred.

Once you find a lawyer these are questions they too can answer-

But the Regional or District COunsel for VA with jurisdiction over this would be the one in the state (or VA jursidictional area)where the VA malpractice occurred.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS- in my case the malpractice occurred in NYS and I filed FTCA here in NY as well as at OGC in DC.

Had I not accepted the settlement then I could have filed in a Federal Court.

These cases must go through the FTCA process first before one decides to file in Fed court.

Judy we have other FTCAers here at hadit too -I am not only one and I hope they chime in-these are good questions-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I really do not understand how the VA can use the CAPS of the State but they get away with it. I am sure that they would make it Federal if filed in a high cost State. Many people who filed in the past used to do some creative stuff to get a favorable jurisdiction. I know one of the Class Action suits against VA was mad in California hoping for a more lenient ruling.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here i am again with more questions.

Attorney General (of Texas) website calls these Torte claims "TTCA" or Texas Torte claims...says they are under the jurisdiction of the State (naturally)... so my question is....

If you file a FTCA claim, is that not a FEDERAL Torte claim and why would it be under the State Cap limit (if it is not a Torte claim against/concerning the STATE?)...

I spoke to Dr. Bash this morning and he will write me a new IMO for the FTCA claim as he agreed that my circumstances warrant such a claim (in his opinion) AND he is also writing document for me to support the EED (or CUE) of the wrongful reduction of rating by VARO between the 1970 to 1982 period. He said Jim was definitely re-rated "inappropriately" (was his word) and it is worth noting here that the IMO from him that I already have very strongly supports the wrongful reduction in rating. lIF this proves correct then the 8 yr or 10 yr rule becomes moot as Jim would have been 100% rated for 22 consecutive years!

Dr. Bash also referred me to an attorney whom he has a very high opinion of so I will consult with him as well as a couple of other attorneys before deciding on one.

Judy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Judy:

Go get them. You and Berta are ferocious

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use