Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Have Another Question?

Rate this question


yoggie2

Question

I know that the VA is able to do as it wishes but my question is this, I Have an Effective Date Of 14 Nov 06 I was found to be totally disabled by SSA Nov 05. I know SSD and VA is two different things but SSD is proof I have been disabled from my Service Connected Disabilities since NOV 05. Now the Law I was showed, said that the VARO shall use the earliest effective date "the date that shows that I had become disabled that would be SSD. I talked to my SO and he is not sure on this but he beleives this only applies to those who leave service within one year..A member here had informed me if I show that I was disabled before my EED they have to go back to that date which is my SSD stated I have been disabled from my SC disabilities but no more than a year... Yogg

GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.

"Do more than is required of you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

To the best of my knowledge, if your ED was for an initial claim the answer is no. If the ED was for an increase, in an existing disability, they can go back a year prior. I believe the rule is if within one yr of discharge, ED is day after discharge, otherwise it's the date of the claim.

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA will only go back to the date your original claim was submitted.They hold you responsible for requesting the exact benefit you seek.

it's me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SSA award-if solely for service connected condit8ions, can often be used to obtain a better EED -if the SSA award came prior to the claim date.

"member here had informed me if I show that I was disabled before my EED they have to go back to that date which is my SSD stated I have been disabled from my SC disabilities but no more than a year... "

I try to make that point Yoggie- and I always give my husband's claim as example-

He filed in Nov 1992 for higher PTSD rating,

awarded 100% P & T PTSD posthumously in 1997-

EED was 1991 ( one year prior to his initial claim date) and the SSA award was stated as determining his total disability and SC unemployability as of the SSA date.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

§3.400 General.

Except as otherwise provided, the effective date of an evaluation and award of pension, compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation based on an original claim, a claim reopened after final disallowance, or a claim for increase will be the date of receipt of the claim or the date entitlement arose, whichever is the later. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5110(a))

Rich, youir PTSD claim is the initial PTSD claim. The back is an increase. The effective date is the date the entitlement arose as it is later than the date filed. That means your PTSD date is the same as the SSDI date for this since your ssdi is for service connected issues.

Anything else would be an error.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you want a really early effective date based on an SSD date the VA has to have known you were on SSD for the SC condition. That should trigger an IU claim. If the VA knew you were on SSD for your SC condition and did not infer an IU claim then I think that is an error. It is the same with other sources of information the VA might have that demonstartes the vet was unemployable due to his SC condition. This knowledge is supposed to trigger an IU claim. For instance, a VA social worker documents the vet is unemployed due to his SC. That is enough to infer TDIU according to the VBM. I have known vets who were on SSD for ten years and the VA only had them rated 50%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I agree with most of what has already been said, but would add this:

I believe it was the late Alex Humphrey that pointed out that if a Veteran mentions to his VA doc something to the effect that the Veteran is depressed and unemployed, that can be successfully appealed as an informal claim date for IU.

What that means to you is to go back through your medical records. See if you told your VA doc that you were unemployed. Then appeal your effective date, based on the fact you told your doc you were unemployed on ___________ date, and that contstitues an informal claim for IU. I think that would also work for depression, and other conditions as well.

Alex was an attorney, as I understand it. He posted here, and you can find his posts here:

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=26566

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use