Jump to content
HadIt.com Changes Ownership ×
VA Disability Claims Community Forums - HadIt.com Veterans
  • veterans-crisis-line.jpg
    The Veterans Crisis Line can help even if you’re not enrolled in VA benefits or health care.

    CHAT NOW

  • question-001.jpeg

    Have Questions? Get Answers.

    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery instead of ‘I have a question.
       
    2. Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title.
      I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
       
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story.
       
      Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.
     
    Leading too:

    exclamation-point.pngPost straightforward questions and then post background information.
     
     
    Examples:
     
    • Question A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
    Rephrase the question: I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
     
    • Question B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
    Rephrase the question: I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?
     
    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial of your claim?”
     
    Note:
     
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. This process does not take long.
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
    • This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • VA Watchdog

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0

Chronic Pain Disorder/chronic Pain


applejack

Question

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

applejack,

Welcome to Hadit.

I think you are referring to 38 CFR.

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-....13&idno=38

§ 4.59 Painful motion.

With any form of arthritis, painful motion is an important factor of disability,

the facial expression, wincing, etc., on pressure or manipulation, should be carefully noted

and definitely related to affected joints. Muscle spasm will greatly assist the identification.

Sciatic neuritis is not uncommonly caused by arthritis of the spine.

The intent of the schedule is to recognize painful motion with joint or periarticular pathology as productive of disability.

It is the intention to recognize actually painful, unstable, or malaligned joints, due to healed injury, as entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint.

Crepitation either in the soft tissues such as the tendons or ligaments, or crepitation within the joint structures should be noted carefully as points of contact which are diseased.

Flexion elicits such manifestations. The joints involved should be tested for pain on both active

and passive motion, in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing and, if possible, with the range of the opposite undamaged joint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

applejack,

Welcome to Hadit.

I think you are referring to 38 CFR.

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-....13&idno=38

§ 4.59 Painful motion.

With any form of arthritis, painful motion is an important factor of disability,

the facial expression, wincing, etc., on pressure or manipulation, should be carefully noted

and definitely related to affected joints. Muscle spasm will greatly assist the identification.

Sciatic neuritis is not uncommonly caused by arthritis of the spine.

The intent of the schedule is to recognize painful motion with joint or periarticular pathology as productive of disability.

It is the intention to recognize actually painful, unstable, or malaligned joints, due to healed injury, as entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint.

Crepitation either in the soft tissues such as the tendons or ligaments, or crepitation within the joint structures should be noted carefully as points of contact which are diseased.

Flexion elicits such manifestations. The joints involved should be tested for pain on both active

and passive motion, in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing and, if possible, with the range of the opposite undamaged joint.

With musculoskeletal ratings there is no rating for pain persay. Rating is weighted towards range of motion in which painful motion is supposed to be considered. Neurological deficits are rated seperately but again pain is used as one of the indicators of a problem and is not necessarily "rated". The long and short of it is the amount of pain you suffer from does not determine your rating. The limitation/s that you face from your disablility do. If you are on pain meds that interfere with your ability to work that can be considered under the category of individual unemployability. If a doctor has determined you have chronic depression due to service connected pain that is rateable. If you have pain issues I highly suggest meeting with a pain management specialist, however, they are not going to provide a "rating for pain".

As always, if someone with more knowledge notices a glaling error in this advice please chime in/correct. I hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Disability Examination Worksheets

Mental Disorders (Except initial PTSD and Eating Disorders) Examination

http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Benefits/exams/disexm37.htm

************************************************************

9422 Pain disorder

Total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as: gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name...100

Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood, due to such symptoms as: suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities; speech intermittently illogical, obscure, or irrelevant; near-continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, appropriately and effectively; impaired impulse control (such as unprovoked irritability with periods of violence); spatial disorientation; neglect of personal appearance and hygiene; difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances (including work or a worklike setting); inability to establish and maintain effective relationships...70

Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships...50

Occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks (although generally functioning satisfactorily, with routine behavior, self-care, and conversation normal), due to such symptoms as: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks (weekly or less often), chronic sleep impairment, mild memory loss (such as forgetting names, directions, recent events)...30

Occupational and social impairment due to mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency and ability to perform occupational tasks only during periods of significant stress, or; symptoms controlled by continuous medication...10

A mental condition has been formally diagnosed, but symptoms are not severe enough either to interfere with occupational and social functioning or to require continuous medication...0

******************************************************************

DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202 (1995) (No. 94-242) (With

respect to the question of whether 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a,

Diagnostic Code (DC) 5201 (limitation of motion of the arm)

subsumes 38 C.F.R. § 4.40, the Court observes that range of

motion undoubtedly can be affected by pain in certain

situations, and a limitation of motion due to pain might indeed

be reflected in a rating under that rating code. However,

section 4.40 specifically refers to disability due to lack of

normal "endurance", provides for a rating to be based on

"functional loss . . . due to . . . pain", and states that "a

part which becomes painful on use must be regarded as seriously

disabled." Furthermore, section 4.40 provides that "t is

essential that the [rating] examination . . . adequately

portray the . . . functional loss." Accordingly, because DC

5201 provides for a rating solely on the basis of loss of range

of motion, "[t]he Court holds that DC 5201 does not subsume 38

C.F.R. § 4.40, and that 38 C.F.R. § 4.14 [avoidance of

pyramiding] does not forbid consideration of a higher rating

based on a greater limitation of motion due to pain on use

including during flare-ups." The Court also holds that DC 5201

does not subsume 38 C.F.R. § 4.45.)

DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202 (1995) (No. 94-242) (Because

the April 1990 VA examination relied upon by the Board in

denying the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his

left shoulder disability merely recorded the range of motion at

that time, and did not indicate consideration of the factors

cited in 38 C.F.R. § 4.40, and required by section 4.40 to be

considered and portrayed in the rating examination, as to

functional loss on use or due to flare-ups, the Court concluded

that a remand to the Board was required for the purpose of

obtaining a new medical examination which complies with the

requirements of section 4.40, and the medical examiner must be

asked to express an opinion on whether pain could significantly

limit functional ability during flare-ups or when the arm is

used repeatedly over a period of time. "Because DC 5201

provides for a rating solely on the basis of loss of range of

motion, these determinations should, if feasible, be

'portray[ed]' (§ 4.40) in terms of the degree of additional

range-of-motion loss due to pain on use or during flare-ups.")

DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202 (1995) (No. 94-242) (With

respect to the Board's determination that 38 C.F.R. § 4.45 did

not provide for an increased rating above 20 percent for the

veteran's service-connected left shoulder disability because

"[w]eakened movement and excess fatigability usually are

associated with muscle injury"; because "ncoordination is

usually associated with disease or injury affecting the

peripheral nerves"; and because this veteran's disability was

not associated with "nerve injury" or "muscle injury, as such,

to the left shoulder girdle", the Court held that the Board's

reading of section 4.45 could not be sustained in that the

plain language of that provision indicates that "[w]eakened

movement", "[e]xcess fatigability", and "ncoordination" do

not refer solely to muscle and nerve conditions. Accordingly,

in the examination ordered on remand, the Court notes that the

medical examiner should be asked to determine whether the left

shoulder joint exhibits weakened movement, excess fatigability,

or incoordination, and, if feasible, these determinations

should be expressed in terms of the degree of additional

range-of-motion loss due to any weakened movement, excess

fatigability, or incoordination.)

DeLuca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202 (1995) (No. 94-242) (In a case

involving a claim for an increased rating above 20 percent for

a service-connected left shoulder disability, it was held by

the Court that a remand was required because the Board's

statement of reasons or bases did not adequately explain how

pain on use was factored into its evaluation of the veteran's

disability in terms of limitation-of-motion equivalency under

38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code (DC) 5201 (limitation of

motion of the arm).)

Voyles v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 451 (1993)

Hatlestad v. Derwinski, 3 Vet.App. 213 (1992)

Quarles v. Derwinski, 3 Vet.App. 129 (1992)

Schafrath v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 589 (1991)

Lichtenfels v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 484 (1991)

Bailey v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 441 (1991)

Ferguson v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 428 (1991) (No. 90-472)

(38 C.F.R. § 4.40--functional loss due to pain, and 38 C.F.R. § 4.59)Martin v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 411 (1991) (No. 90-343) (38

C.F.R. § 4.59)

Ferraro v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 326 (1991) (No. 90-444)

(functional loss due to pain)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You have to remember that VA considers chronic pain disorder to be an emotional disorder like PTSD or depression. The physical parts of the pain disorder are so intertwined with psychological factors they treat it as if you have a mental disorder. I am SC for chronic pain and some emotional problems, but it all comes to 70%.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

To answer your question, yes there is a recognized disability called Chronic Pain Syndrome, and it falls under the mental/psychiatric realm. I can't remember the Diagnostic Code number right off the top of my head.

And, it has nothing to do with "painful motion" as covered in a couple of the answers to your question. The "painful motion" that is referred to is considered a disability of the muscular/skeletal system and is covered in the ortho section of the diagnostic codes.

The Chronic Pain Syndrome can be caused by anything that can cause "chronic" pain, be it muscles, joints, migraines, cancer, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Im confused & trying to get a claim for Chronic Pain Syndrome set up for the VARO.

Am I to understand that pain with motion, can not be the cause or contribute to Chronic Pain Syndrome? If this is the case I doubt i'll get much of an award. My pain is chronic without moving, but made far worse when I do. So they wouldn't consider this than?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Im confused & trying to get a claim for Chronic Pain Syndrome set up for the VARO.

Am I to understand that pain with motion, can not be the cause or contribute to Chronic Pain Syndrome? If this is the case I doubt i'll get much of an award. My pain is chronic without moving, but made far worse when I do. So they wouldn't consider this than?

And, I repeat what I have already said:

"The Chronic Pain Syndrome can be caused by anything that can cause "chronic" pain, be it muscles, joints, migraines, cancer, etc."

The "painful motion" situations as previously described on a couple of posts here, refer to the amount of disability due to the restrictions placed upon a joint due to the experience of "pain" (you can't move 'cause it hurts). The "Chronic Pain Syndrome" as we are talking about, has to do with how your psyche reacts to being in constant (chronic) pain, and is a psychological disease entity and not a physical disease entity (it's how pain affects your behavior overall, not how a certain joint is painful to move thereby causing restriction of movement to that particular joint).

And, yes, pain with motion can be the cause of Chronic Pain Syndrome, just not the ONLY cause.

Does this help the understanding of Chronic Pain Syndrome?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, I repeat what I have already said:

"The Chronic Pain Syndrome can be caused by anything that can cause "chronic" pain, be it muscles, joints, migraines, cancer, etc."

The "painful motion" situations as previously described on a couple of posts here, refer to the amount of disability due to the restrictions placed upon a joint due to the experience of "pain" (you can't move 'cause it hurts). The "Chronic Pain Syndrome" as we are talking about, has to do with how your psyche reacts to being in constant (chronic) pain, and is a psychological disease entity and not a physical disease entity (it's how pain affects your behavior overall, not how a certain joint is painful to move thereby causing restriction of movement to that particular joint).

And, yes, pain with motion can be the cause of Chronic Pain Syndrome, just not the ONLY cause.

Does this help the understanding of Chronic Pain Syndrome?

9422 Pain disorder i dont know if it right it the only code i see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
9422 Pain disorder i dont know if it right it the only code i see

Yup, that's it. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks Larryj & C&P man.

That helped me understand. I get a mental block sometimes and nothing gets through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Larryj & C&P man.

That helped me understand. I get a mental block sometimes and nothing gets through.

not a prb allen..i loe helping bc i have recieved alot of help on here allready

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone. I read through this discussion thread and found some good information for my case. I understand that Chronic Pain Syndrome is a mental rating, however I don't understand how the VA factors in post-surgical nerve pain, which in my case is constant, unrelenting and not controlled with medication. I woke up from a double laminectomy back in June 2008, and the first thing I felt was a painful sensation coming from my left hand, which was resting on the cold metal of the side of the gurney in the recovery room. The first words out of my mouth were, "what happened to my left hand." My surgeon told me that the nerves feeding my left arm had snapped once the laminae were removed, because they had been so restricted for so long (at C4-6 I have two rods and four screws). As I came to more I noticed it was painful on my forearm and top of my hand from hyper sensation and painful on my palm from numbness. The doctor thought it would heal, but it's now been 19 months post-surgery and it's gotten more painful, not less.

I brought this to the attention of my QTC medical examiner, but he seemed to forgot anything I said, because he barely addressed anything more than minor pain on movement, and gave me 20% for L. arm pain, and 20% for neck (soon to be reduced to 10%, because in the words of the QTC doctor, "I have full range of motion in my neck with only some pain on movement.) He didn't take any measurements, and concluded I had +45 degrees on all motions.

What he didn't say is that I live with pretter intense pain in my left arm and hand, along my shoulders and down my neck and back where the scar is from the surgery. I guess I'm going to have to address this in my NOD and I'm looking into getting an IMO as well, because I think the examiner blew it!

TCK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

tck5810,

Who did your surgery? The VA or a private surgeon?

Again, it sounds like another case where the QTC examiners are failing to do their job. When gathering measurements, they are supposed to use the goinometer (I think that's what it is called). I had a physical therapist who used one and said it is the only way they can gather accurate measurements.

We should probably have a completely separate category created for QTC C&P disasters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use