Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

V.a. General Counsel Precedent Opinion 12-98

Rate this question


deltaj

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Lately we have been discussing earlier effective dates a lot. Could someone please set up a link to V.A. General Counsel Precedent Opinion 12-98 because this explains entitlement to an earlier effective date of 38 CFR 3.400 (o) (2). Earlier effective dates may be available under 38 CFR 3.400 (q) in some instances. This precedent opinion, as far as I can recall, does not discuss earlier effective dates under 38 CFR 3.155 which pertains to informal claims.

Edited by deltaj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

PREC 12-98 Effective Date of Increased Rating Claim -- 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2) and (q)(1)(i)

Citation: Vet. Aff. Op. Gen. Couns. Prec. 12-98, VAOPGCPREC 12-98, 1998

LINK http://www.va.gov/ogc/opinions/1998precedentopinions.asp

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

FYI, the link I provided was the complete opinion memorandum also, but I guess no one liked mine, so I've deleted it.

pr

Thank you for posting the link. Note that the top link on the window that opens is for the full 8 page V.A. General Counsel Precedent Opinion Memorandum.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the most profound regs dealing with EEDS is the Nehmer decision.

Any AO vet should carefully read the Nehmer Retro Regs as -and I have mentioned this here before many times-

VA has certainly tried to hold back AO comp from vets and widows. NVLSP found almost 30 million had been withheld from AO vets years ago but they are still doing it.

The AO retro regs are divided into the 3 classes of AO Class Action Members explained in detail in the VBM by NVLSP.

For example- the BVA on remand reminded VA I would be entitled to ancillary benefits I don't get now plus a refund of a five figure settlement offset (FTCA) if I succeeded on my AO death claim.BVA understands the Nehmer decision.

When I got the award from BVA in April- about 3 weeks later the award came from the VARO-Forgetting completely that they owe me the offset amount, also a new Chapter 35 date and award (which I need to recover 6-7 thousand I paid to my school when my Chap 35 under Rod's posthumous 100% SC P & T award ran out) a proper new CHap 35 award for my daughter), SMC consideration (300% SC)and proper accrued, also one additional year SC 100% accrued due to Nehmer,

there were 6 issues I had pending and I forget this minute what they all were-all resolved by the BVA award -or should have been-

they are close to 6 figure award if not over and yet the RO somehow deliberately ignored the prime facet of this award- the Nehmer decision and the ancillary benefits and offset statement by the BVA.

I think this is happening more than we know-

Agent Orange veterans and their widows are being denied the provisions of Nehmer.

I raised Hell with them right away- and they are working on the proper award now.

Every AO veteran and widow is in a Class Action case- the Nehmer Class Action-which NVLSP won years ago.

VA is not even mentioning Nehmer in their AO awards because they dont want us to know the ramifications of this type of award.They are afraid we will google Nehmer and find how vastly different the proper AO retro awards can be in many AO claims- beyond the regular traditional EEDs.

VA had the audacity to state that due to my receipt of DIC under 1151-there are no other monetary benefits due to me with the direct SC award.

In spite of the BVA's clear statements that I am ( and even NVLSP agreed)

They depend on us all to have our heads in the sand and not be fully aware of what they owe us.

NVLSP has an entire section at their web site on the Retro aspects of Nehmer.

Each case has to be considered individually to figure out what category of the class action the vet or widow is in.

My former Service rep-when he read my claim-filed specifically in 2003 under auspices of Nehmer-

asked me who and what Nehmer was.

He was already getting AO comp for DMII from VA and didnt even know if his retro was correct.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
FYI, the link I provided was the complete opinion memorandum also, but I guess no one liked mine, so I've deleted it.

pr

PR, I tried your link but it didn't work (for me), so I posted another link in addition to yours. ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
PR, I tried your link but it didn't work (for me), so I posted another link in addition to yours. ~Wings

Philip, Bless you for posting the link. It's just that V.A. shortens information sometimes and leaves out important stuff that can help a veteran win. I just happened to notice that on the website of V.A. General Counsel Precedent Opinions 12-98 is longer and more comprehensive. Please don't forget, Philip, that all of us here are volunteers and the efforts of all of us, including you, are appreciated. Thank you for trying to help me by posting the link and I congratulate you that you are technically savvy enough to post a link. I haven't learned to do that yet so I'm always asking people like you to do that for me. Please don't be discouraged when a more detailed version of an opinion is found by someone else.

Edited by deltaj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use