Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Does Anybody Recall A Regulation Or Court Decision?

Rate this question


jlshand

Question

Thought I had seen somewhere in my research that the VARO's are supposed to give precedence to Independent medical Opinions over VA employed MD's

Might have been in a BVA decision or even someone on this board.

Does anybody recall seeing something to this effect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

See if your situation resembles that of the veteran in Sklar v. Brown, U.S. Court of Veterans Appeals, No. 91-1586, in a decision dated 5-18-93. In that case, the Court held that if there is a diagnosis by a specialist, and the only evidence against the veteran claim is a contrary opinion by a non-specialist, then the findings of the non-specialist should carry little weight.

We've argued that my husband's C & P exam was flawed, and the denial based on that exam should be thrown out. The exam was performed by a non-Board certified internal medicine doc whose opinion was given more weight than my husband's personal Board certified internal doc and a non-VA Board certified surgeon who performed my husband's carpal tunnel surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Vicki

What I might do is get another IMO and submit as new evidence instead of arguing with the VA. These arguments can go on for years via BVA and remands. Let the VA rule on the new evidence. Berta often says surround the VA with evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will there much of a difference between the date you first submitted the claim and the date of the new IMO?

Our experience has shown that eventually everything ends up at the Board anyway, regardless of what we provide to the VARO. I hope you have better luck.

Let us know how you make out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

I sure do agree with Berta on that. If you can afford it, to see another doc that is, just slam the hell out of VA with more evidence. Be sure though to study up on IMO requirements the IMO doc needs to cover or VA will knock the IMO and state

it's not valid as it was prepared contemporary to your claim. IMO doc needs to state that after reviewing your SMR's it is his medical conclussion that your disability of (diagnosis)_______, manifesited by(symptoms)______,and/or

documented by findings of (lab results, x-rays, etc...)_______, are definetly

related to your (if possible) documented military injury injury or illness.

Then list his credentials and/or specialities.

Only my opinion from my pea brain. Good luck buddy.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlie,

Can you clarify what you meant in your statement that the VA denied an IMO because it was "contemporary" with the claim?

Did you mean the IMO didnt have some variation on the theme of the Dr. stating "after a complete review of the medical history"

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a past RO denial of mine the adjudicator stated in reason & bases :

"We do not find her testimony as to the incurrence of inservice injury to be of sufficient probity to weigh in equipoise (balance) with medical evidence prepared contemporary to the time frame in question."

This was actually the VA going against their own VA C&P doc's info.

It took a few years to beat it down, but the truth finally rose to the top as it usually does if you hang in there.

Hope this helps someone.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
    • JME earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • JME earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JME earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JME earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use