Jump to content
  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!

Question

Hi Gang,

Has any one heard of a glucoma/diabetes connection relative to A/O? I have diabietes (20%) and recently developed a (so far) mild case of glucoma. I have no family history of either one of these ailments and am wondering if the glucoma is a result of diabetes? So far the diabetes has not caused any bleeding in the back of the eye and the oral medication seems to be controlling it fairly well (blood sugar stays at 130-140). <_< Man- I just love these little faces LOL

Thanks

Cavtrooper088

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Diabetes Seems to Heighten Glaucoma Risk

Regular screenings may help prevent irreversible nerve damage

By Serena Gordon

Posted 5/2/08

FRIDAY, May 2 (HealthDay News) -- While diabetes has long been associated with the potentially sight-stealing disease diabetic retinopathy, it appears that another serious eye disease -- glaucoma -- may also be a complication of the metabolic disorder.

Read the full US News artical hear....

http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/healthday/080502/diabetes-seems-to-heighten-glaucoma-risk.htm

************************************************************************

1: Surv Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;53 Suppl1:S3-10.

Risk factors for glaucoma onset and progression.

Coleman AL, Miglior S.

Frances and Ray Stark Professor of Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

In this review, we distinguish among risk factors associated with the development of open-angle glaucoma in individuals with healthy eyes, predictive determinants for the development of open-angle glaucoma in subjects with ocular hypertension, and prognostic factors for the progression of open-angle glaucoma in individuals who already have the disease. We primarily reviewed recent longitudinal population-based epidemiological studies, prospectively planned clinical trials, and cohort studies. Risk factors consistently associated with the development of open-angle glaucoma in individuals with healthy eyes include older age and an approximately 1 mm Hg increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) at baseline. Family history for open-angle glaucoma may be associated with the development of open-angle glaucoma as well. Predictive factors for the development of open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension may be older age, thinner central corneal thickness, higher cup-to-disk ratios of the optic disc, and higher pattern standard deviation values on the Humphrey automated perimeter at baseline. Given multi-center trials that showed similar predictive factors for the development of open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension, a calculator is available to clinicians for assessing the 5-year likelihood of developing open-angle glaucoma in ocular hypertensive patients with certain characteristics. Prognostic factors for the progression of open-angle glaucoma in individuals who already have the condition include older age at baseline, higher IOP at baseline, and thinner central conreal thickness. Self-report of diabetes may be associated with open-angle glaucoma progression. In conclusion, the only modifiable factor associated with open-angle glaucoma that has been consistently identified is elevated baseline IOP. Future research needs to evaluate the importance of others modifiable factors such as IOP fluctuation or nutritional factors.

PMID: 19038621 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1903862...Pubmed_RVDocSum

*********************************************************************

1: Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;126(12):1740-7. LinksProjection of diabetic retinopathy and other major eye diseases among people with diabetes mellitus: United States, 2005-2050.

Saaddine JB, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KM, Zhang X, Klein R, Boyle JP.

Division of Diabetes Translation/Vision Health Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. jsaaddine@cdc.gov

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the number of people with diabetic retinopathy (DR), vision-threatening DR (VTDR), glaucoma, and cataracts among Americans 40 years or older with diagnosed diabetes mellitus for the years 2005-2050.

METHODS: Using published prevalence data of DR, VTDR, glaucoma, and cataracts and data from the National Health Interview Survey and the US Census Bureau, we projected the number of Americans with diabetes with these eye conditions.

RESULTS: The number of Americans 40 years or older with DR and VTDR will triple in 2050, from 5.5 million in 2005 to 16.0 million for DR and from 1.2 million in 2005 to 3.4 million for VTDR. Increases among those 65 years or older will be more pronounced (2.5 million to 9.9 million for DR and 0.5 million to 1.9 million for VTDR). The number of cataract cases among whites and blacks 40 years or older with diabetes will likely increase 235% by 2050, and the number of glaucoma cases among Hispanics with diabetes 65 years or older will increase 12-fold.

CONCLUSION: Future increases in the number of Americans with diabetes will likely lead to significant increases in the number with DR, glaucoma, and cataracts. Our projections may help policy makers anticipate future demands for health care resources and possibly guide the development of targeted interventions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Efforts to prevent diabetes and to optimally manage diabetes and its complications are needed.

PMID: 19064858 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1903862...Pubmed_RVDocSum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

Citation Nr: 0712998

Decision Date: 05/02/07 Archive Date: 05/15/07

DOCKET NO. 05-22 305 ) DATE

)

)

On appeal from the

Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in No. Little

Rock, Arkansas

THE ISSUES

1. Entitlement to service connection for glaucoma, secondary

to service-connected diabetes mellitus.

2. Entitlement to service connection for seborrheic

dermatitis (dermatitis), secondary to service-connected

diabetes mellitus.

.......................................

..............................

I. Glaucoma

The veteran's private medical records from a doctor of

optometry consistently show notations of his diabetic status

in conjunction with glaucoma. In February 2005, the veteran

underwent a VA ophthalmology examination. The physician

diagnosed glaucoma and stated that diabetes mellitus is a

risk factor for glaucoma, but does not cause glaucoma. The

Board finds that the evidence is in relative equipoise; thus,

it is sufficient to establish service connection for

glaucoma.............

....................

ORDER

Service connection for glaucoma, secondary to diabetes

mellitus, is granted.

Service connection for dermatitis, secondary to diabetes

mellitus, is granted.

____________________________________________

MICHAEL E. KILCOYNE

Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals

Department of Veterans Affairs

Link to the complete case: http://www.va.gov/vetapp07/files2/0712998.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(blue water navy vet)

Search Terms: GLAUCOMA SECONDARY DIABETES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Designated for electronic publication only

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

No. 05-3317

Jack F. Thwaites, Appellant,

v.

R. James Nicholson,

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.

......................................

................

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the Board's October 31, 2005, decision is REVERSED to

the extent that the Board denied the appellant the application of the

presumption of exposure to herbicides. It is further

ORDERED that the Board's decision denying service connection for

diabetes mellitus on a presumptive basis is VACATED and REMANDED for

readjudication consistent with this decision. It is further

ORDERED that the Board's decision denying secondary service

connection for a circulatory disorder, glaucoma, hypertension, kidney

disease, interventricular bleeding, residuals of a stroke, and a seizure

disorder, all claimed as the result of diabetes mellitus, is VACATED and

REMANDED for readjudication consistent with this decision.

DATED: October 16, 2006 BY THE COURT:

WILLIAM A. MOORMAN

Judge

Copies to:

Robert V. Chisholm

VA General Counsel (027)

************************************************

link to complete case: http://search.vetapp.gov/isysquery/7ee64d6...aee00934/3/doc/

Edited by allan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good information, Glocoma was found to be a secondary to Diabetis and awarded Citation Nr 0712998 5/02/07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a pretty close relationship between cataracts and DMII as well. These VA doctors examine you, and never tell you that you might have a SC condition due to AO. They don't even know about the connections, and if they did know they probably would keep their mouths shut. Doctors in the private sector know absolutely nothing about agent orange and possible related diseases. You tell them that you DMII is due to AO and they just look blankly at you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask
      Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask. Chris Attig - Veterans Law Blog 

      <br style="color:#000000; text-align:start">How to Hire an Attorney For Your VA Claim or Appeal Free Guidebook available on the Veterans Law Blog

      I got an email the other day from a Veteran.  It had 2 or 3 sentences about his claim, and then closed at the end: “Please call me. So-and-so told me you were the best and I want your help.”

      While I appreciate the compliments, I shudder a little at emails like this.  For 2 reasons.

      First, I get a lot of emails like this.  And while I diligently represent my clients – I often tell them we will pursue their claim until we have no more appeals or until we win – I am most assuredly not the best.

      There are a LOT of damn good VA Disability attorneys out there.  (Most, if not all, of the best are members of the National Organization of Veterans Advocates…read about one of them, here)

      Second, I don’t want Veterans to choose their attorney based on who their friend thought was the best.  I want Veterans to choose the VA Disability attorney who is BEST for their case.

      In some situations, that may be the Attig Law Firm.

      But it may also be be Hill and Ponton, or Chisholm-Kilpatrick, or Bergman Moore.  Or any one of the dozens of other attorneys who have made the representation of Veterans their professional life’s work.

      There are hundreds of attorneys that are out there representing Veterans, and I’m here to tell you that who is best for your friend’s case may not be the best for your case.

      How do you Find the Best VA Disability Attorney for your Claim?

      First, you have to answer the question: do you NEED an attorney?

      Some of you don’t...
      • 1 reply
    • VA Emergency Medical Care
      VA Emergency Medical Care
      • 3 replies
    • Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      • 0 replies
    • Thanks Berta for your help. I did receive my 100% today for my IU claim on 6/20/2018. It only took 64 days to complete and it is p&t. Thanks for your words of wisdom. 
    • Thank you Buck for your help. I did receive my 100% for my IU claim today June 20, 2018 and it is p&t. The claim only took 64 days. Thank you so much for your help. 
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines