Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Claim Denial By False Logic

Rate this question


monochaser

Question

Have nexus, evidence, and living with pain, yet a claim for an increase from 0% was denied with lightning speed. I don't know what to do next. Am willing to shell out $$ for a civilian ortho MD if it will help, but I don't have health insurance, so I must know what kind of evidence and info I'm looking for before I go.

Long story short- SC 0% upon discharge for Lumbosacral Strain. Back pain has progressively gotten worse in last 10 years until 2003. 5 consecutive months of (intermittent) incapacitating back problems in that year, VA performed MRI and diagnosed a herniated disk. With this I applied for an increase, and with murphy's law in full force, my back pain was in remission when C&P time came around. But I had my evidence. Surely the good doc would see that. Well, the examiner was an openly hostile retired "rent-a-doc" who insulted my profession. Not a Good day.

He gave his opinion that Lumbosacral strains are not causitive of a Herniated Disk (no kidding), and any pain I was experiencing was from the disk condition, not the service connected back strain. Claim Denied.

What this einstein did not adress is, when did the disk condition occur? It could've happened in the military and been the cause of the back problems since then. They never CT'd or MRI'd back then. The denial knocked the wind out of me and the year passed by- but I want to re-open a new claim as I'm living with pain on an almost daily basis. Unfortunately all the VSO's are concentrated over a hundred miles away and are so backlogged with cases it is difficult to get some face time with them.

The most frustrating aspect of this is contained in the first sentence of this post. I provided the VA with everything we have been told is required, but they played games with the cause-result factor- but for this I think it is possible to argue against their position due to their lack of scientific evidence. How can they can get away with these weak excuses for denial. Every time I limp from one room of my house to another in agony, I curse the flippant, direspectful attitude of that overpaid c&p MD.

Since nexus is established, I am frustrated with having to go bust a hump and collect evidence- any suggestions for what I should include in my next claim for an increase? And what do you think about using one of those state employed VSO's? They are only 50 miles away- still pretty far. Thanks for any light you can shed on these circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Keep journals of when you have pain, how severe it is and how it affects your life at the time. Try to get into some form of long term rehab and/or regular exams for your back and keep ALL the evidence you acquire. Find out the criteria minimums for the various levels in regards to back injuries and try to formulate your journal, and medical evidence, to meet said criteria. You need to spoon feed them the information so that they have NO choice but to grant the level you are seeking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Berta

They need evidence like this:

http://www.neurosurgerytoday.org/what/pati...e/herniated.asp

"Causes

A single excessive strain or injury may cause a herniated disc. However, disc material degenerates naturally as you age, and the ligaments that hold it in place begin to weaken. As this degeneration progresses, a relatively minor strain or twisting movement can cause a disc to rupture."

But better yet, a documented medical statement that supports this fact.

Is there any time at all since you got the denial left to file a Notice of Disagreement?

The above abstract, attached to the NOD, supports your claim.

These claims can succeed with good medical evidence:

"This appeal arises from a May 1992 rating decision in which

the regional office (RO) denied entitlement to service

connection for degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral

spine, status post laminectomy and denied entitlement to an

increased evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals of

a lumbosacral sprain. In June 1996, service connection for

degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine, status

post laminectomy was granted, in part and parcel to the

service-connected lumbosacral strain disability and the

assigned 10 percent evaluation was increased to 20 percent."

From : http://www.va.gov/vetapp97/files2/9716400.txt

The decision however denied higher rating-

the veteran maintained the 20% rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Mono

You need medical evidence in the form of a narrative from your own doctor that will connect the back strain in service to your current problems. You just have to pound them with evidence and the more the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't have a doctor other than my PCP at a VA outreach clinic who I've seen 2x in the last year- I'm one of those people the politicians are always talking about- an American without health insurance. Must say the VA has provided some excellent care, so no complaints there.

Thanks for the responses. My time to file a Notice of Disagreement has expired- has been 1 yr and some months since the denial. I'm going to go to private doctor, that's why I was asking about what kind of evidence is needed. I would imagine one meeting with a specialist will cost almost $200 so I would like to be prepared before I go.

I've moved a lot. Is it possible my c file wasn't with my claim? Do I need to check with the RO to find out where my file resides? It would be handy to have a service officer to ask these questions, but they are 100 miles away, and busy. If they are as bad as some people say they are, how do we navigate through this confusing process? By the way, the SO that helped me with this claim last time was supposed to be the best. After the denial he said- well, that's it. You lost. Tough luck. Nothing more we can do. Thank God for this website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Page 121 of John Roche's book, "The Veteran's Survival Guide," addresses the subject of exams conducted while a condition is not active. He advises that you should contact the VA Medical Center to advise of this fact so you can be rescheduled and evaluated when the condition is active and can be observed by a physician.

"Failure of the VA to evaluate your condition during an active stage is grounds for reversal if the claim is denied."

He goes on to cite Ardison v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 405 (1994). In that decision, the Court ruled the VA failed in its duty to assist by relying on an examination that was performed during an inactive stage.

You might try CUEing it to seek an approval effective when you first filed. It's worth a try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use