Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Neurologist Consult Note (attached)

Rate this question


cannoncocker

Question

Second page states " pain in leg because/began ? in service and did not improve. This is what he handed me and I have an approved fee basis letter from the asheville VAMC to corroborate this note. As in it isn't just something I wrote, they followed through and I did the PT and meds and declined the needle in the back and surgery.

will this carry any weight at my DRO hearing? Evidently they ignored it on my requests for reconsideration.

Note attached front and back on their stationary.

what I actually told them the leg pain increased in 2005, when I began seeking treatment, but my MRI's absolutely demonstrate pre 2005 back injury as explained and pointed out by the doctor referencing light and dark disc fluid.

Edited by cannoncocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I dont want to alarm you but that is very weak.

To give some sort of explanation for a condition a Doc must state that the entire medical record was reviewed and then state an opinion. The VA uses the percentage rule.

With this not being done, the RO will most likely ignore it or not give it any weight.

You need a statement stating records were reviewed and the opinion must state that your leg condition is at least as likely as not related to the condition you had in service.

If I were you I would take the records to another Doc to get an opinion.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree it is weak. As John says you need a medical opinion that states the doctor has reviewed your SMR's, current medical records, and says that your condition is at least as likely as not related to your service. You may need what we call an independent medical opinion from a doctor. Here at Hadit there are examples of how the report should look like and what it should address. We have had this discussion many times about medical reports. We all start out with these kinds of hen scratches from doctors and learn usually the hard way that they won't cut it with the VA. Words like "possibly, probably, maybe" are death to a claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont want to alarm you but that is very weak.

To give some sort of explanation for a condition a Doc must state that the entire medical record was reviewed and then state an opinion. The VA uses the percentage rule.

With this not being done, the RO will most likely ignore it or not give it any weight.

You need a statement stating records were reviewed and the opinion must state that your leg condition is at least as likely as not related to the condition you had in service.

If I were you I would take the records to another Doc to get an opinion.

J

Really do appreciate your reply. Your reply is exactly why I posted this, that is to get an idea of what that meant in terms of relevance to my claim because on their reconsideration they basically said 180 degree opposite of what that said, saying only conservative treatment, which was my choice, not his directive. But anyway my plan is to take my SMR's which consists of ER notes and unit aid station notes changing meds, 2 MRI's, and radiology evaluations for both MRI's, possibly notes from that consult if that would add to my claim, then find someone on the cheap side (haha). Maybe chiropractor or neurologist depending on cost, in my area to write a nexus ltr.

Hope that sound like a reasonable plan. Where on this forum can I find the variations of language required for a good nexus? Or is that it, I have reviewed XXXXX records and find that his current condition XXXXXXX is/more than likely/possibly/more likely than not. I want to make it as simple as possible for the reviewer and want to provide them with an example of what I am looking for. My VSO as usual has been of zero value in this regard but why break a trend now.

Nope, I wasn't planning on that being my sole evidence but being a Safety and Occupational Health Specialist trained by the Army, I would think the NIOSH lifting table would at least provide some connection between Herniated discs and Degenerative disc disease and sciatica from pinched S1 would provide an accepted standard which should not be a stretch to see the connection between that and repetetive lifting of projo's from ground level to shoulder level that weighed about 1.5 x my weight x 6.5 years.

Good/bad/thick as a brick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It reads to me as if that part of a statement was probably made from the history you reported.

I agree,very weak and no weight will be afforded to it in the VA disability claims process.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree if I was planning on using that solo, but on the other hand I did not tell him to write down the options I wanted or was part of my medical history. Actually the whole thing was them. The reconsideration denied any epidural injections or surgery which are listed on that. Those definitely are not part of my medical history, only options they offered. Since I have the letter of approval for injections on fee basis that I declined along with the surgery. I'll pass on both.

I can assure you that I did not tell them that my leg pain originated from a pinched S1 nerve which is also documented on the MRI evaluation, nor did I tell him I had herniated discs. the MRI's clearly show: protruded, extruded, degenerated ......discs. Did not tell them the numbness on my thighs-bilateral was from groin nerves. I have had doctors specualte on that from pre diabetic to things I can't pronounce. They have no idea about that.

Other parts could be interpreted as my words and they just wrote it down in the middle of my options. Why they would do that is curious since he pointed out how he could tell an old injury from and new injury by the color of the disc fluid which presumably whoever I get to do my nexus letter will be attune to.

This sounds like a DRO Hearing and you guys are trying to help. I don't mean it that way but do want to know how to responde and don't want to be suprised. Like the saying goes in law, don't ask a question you don't already have an answer to.

Thank you for the critque and I will use that in my planning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mere statement of, "it is just as likely as," will not suffice. The IMO will have to not only include that he has reviewed both the service medical records and any civilain or VA medical records, but that they have also examined you and found that your injuries and limitations were consistant with, as per the CFR schedule of disabilite rating/ which percentage rating that matches your condition. Then they must given their rationale/ reason and basis for their opinion, noting specifics of your case and as to how they apply to his opinion and provide any supporting documentation/treateses that he can along with a history of his schooling, specialtese, experience, and any cirtification in any related specialties that support his knowledge and opinion.

This is why it is hard to get a decent opinion to knock down what the VA uses. Unless the IMO is loaded for bear, even if the Evaluation of your condition came from a NP like mine did, your not like to get a change in their opinion or if your lucky, have your IMO used to outweigh the other VA doctors or C&P examiners opinion during the rating process.

Rockhound Rider

Edited by Rockhound

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use