Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100% Schedular Permanent & Total

Rate this question


bigoc

Question

Does anyone have or have any experience with 100% P&T schedular.  

I know some would suggest to go for the individual unemployability route but I am not interested in this.  I also hear that 100 schedular is near impossible, I am not interested in this view as I am almost there, even with VA math.

I still able to work but I have a multitude of disabilities incurred in service and I am in the process of getting my claims fully rated as I am lowballed or denied for a few.  Once everything is fixed up according to the VA's own rating criteria I will be 100% schedular.  

So I just wanted to know if anyone has any experience in getting their 100 schedular P&T.  Or any experience with the 100 schedular issue in general.  Nothing against the individual unemployability folks, this is just not my situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the words of encouragement.  And I hear you with the process going soothly(sarcasm).  I have prepared myself for a long process.  I started out with no idea how to submit a claim.  Put in a really poorly put together claim and got 60%.  Now I am educating myself with the help of this platform and other sources of info and I hope to gain much more with a better understanding of the process.  I am trying to get to that 100% mark and then I will hope to feel a sense of completion.  I am helping many other friends of mine with their claims locally and it does give you good feeling helping others.

I think there is a sense that because you can work you do not warrant a 100% rating.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Some veterans before a disability may be able to achieve an annual income of $100,000+.  No one, not even our current government has the ability to tell you what income you are entitled to earn.  Employment income and VA disability income are two separate sources not to be confused.  That is why the VA system is based on specifically how the condition with the use of ability to earn income(VA verbiage specifically: "loss of earning") as a secondary factor is used only in some conditions.  SSDI is based off loss of ability to work and not primarily evaluating the condition.  SSDI cases usually have more to do with showing a loss in ability to keep gainful employment.  And if you will notice there is no specific dollar amount mentioned anywhere in the VA rating system except with TDIU ratings.

Let no one forget what this whole system is about... compensating veterans for their service to this great country and injury they may have incurred in that service.  I think some get this system confused with the social security system.  

Long tangent, I do appreciate everyones help and support with all of these issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a sense that because you can work you do not warrant a 100% rating.  

I don't feel that way at all - heck, you can bet your bottom dollar

that if I were VA 100 % schedular and could still hold employment,

I would surely be doing that.

Employment income and VA disability income are two separate sources not to be confused.

You are right about this.

SSDI is based off loss of ability to work and not primarily evaluating the condition.  SSDI cases usually have more to do with showing a loss in ability to keep gainful employment. 

In all of the SSDI cases I've seen to include mine -- all medical conditions

are brought into the SSA adjudication process and highly evaluated on the effect

the condition's have on employment.

Let no one forget what this whole system is about... compensating veterans for their service to this great country and injury they may have incurred in that service.  

Yes, you are correct,

"this whole system is about... compensating veterans for their service to this great country and injury they may have incurred in that service."

Something I have realized though is that the VA disability claims adjudication

process - has many problems in it - thousands of claimant's with solid claims

get denied or lowballed for various reasons.

I think some get this system confused with the social security system.

There maybe a few here that have certain aspects of VA and SSA a bit

confused - but I feel most here are quite well versed in the difference of

the two.

carlie  

Edited by carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use