I Need The Big Wigs Hadit

[Mr cue]

ok i was 10% from 94 until 2001 when i put in my own paper i was granted 60%iu because i had not work since 94. i did a cue of my 94 claim and the bva say there can not be a cue of a claim that is still open. so remaned it to amc that whole story but i got the denied from amc say it on the way back to board. call vba today was told it in transit. ok now if my claim from 94 is still open than that means my eef date should be 94 for my 60% iu right i look at laws anyone every since any thing like this.

[Mr cue]

i never got ssi i done have ant work credits i have no ss earning i was 22 than now 40 never work been going bak and froth to va for all those years all comp exam say i was not working due to injury and likelyhood of working is slim this was 2001 iu claim.

[Philip Rogers]

You should file for SSDI using '94 as your disability onset date. At age 22 you don't need many credits and would have gotten them from your military service. If not, you may be eligible against your father's SS account.

pr

i never got ssi i done have ant work credits i have no ss earning i was 22 than now 40 never work been going bak and froth to va for all those years all comp exam say i was not working due to injury and likelyhood of working is slim this was 2001 iu claim.

[Mr cue]

philp never thought of that once i finsch this race i will get at that because i was denied 2001 they should have use 94 see what u learn on hadit. lol but look at this. got it from some lawyer for veterans site but i am using this right to after them with.

the non-adjudication of a claim expressly raised by the veteran. If the record shows veteran made a claim, which was simply overlooked and not decided by the VA, the claim is unadjudicated. That is it was never decided and it remains an open claim. If a veteran files a claim for the same benefit sometimes thereafter, normally by filing new and material evidence which reopens the claim, the effective date for this newly reopened claim relates back to the date of the filing of the prior, unadjudicated claim

[Philip Rogers]

I think we posted something similiar here about 15 yrs ago. An unadjudicated claim is an open claim.

pr

philp never thought of that once i finsch this race i will get at that because i was denied 2001 they should have use 94 see what u learn on hadit. lol but look at this. got it from some lawyer for veterans site but i am using this right to after them with.

the non-adjudication of a claim expressly raised by the veteran. If the record shows veteran made a claim, which was simply overlooked and not decided by the VA, the claim is unadjudicated. That is it was never decided and it remains an open claim. If a veteran files a claim for the same benefit sometimes thereafter, normally by filing new and material evidence which reopens the claim, the effective date for this newly reopened claim relates back to the date of the filing of the prior, unadjudicated claim

[Berta]

"i never got ssi i done have ant work credits i have no ss earning i was 22 than now 40 never work been going bak and froth to va for all those years all comp exam say i was not working due to injury and likelyhood of working is slim this was 2001 iu claim."

Do you mean 'due to injury' as an injury you had in service???

Philip is right- unadjudicated means still open

[Mr cue]

i got hurt in army i was 22 i have not work since i apply for ssd and was told i dont have work credits so now that my claim for m 94 is still open i will use 94 as my date to get ssd now i should have no problem with work credits but one fight at a time .