Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Extraschedular

Rate this question


Berta

Question

The VA never acknowledged receipt of my husband's TDIU form.

They awarded from 30% SC for PTSD in his lifetime to-posthumous award to 100% SC for PTSD. They used his PTSD SSA award date for the VA EED.

If this had been an extraschedular award wouldn't the decision have said that?

The claim as far as I know certainly never went to VACO for any extraschedular review.It never left the VARO as far as I know.I continually supplied evidence to them after he died.

This is why I often get confused as to extraschedular awards.

I had the following rating criteria for 100% SC for PTSD when I re-opened his PTSD claim and I focused solely on the documented evidence that put him into that criteria.

This insert from a BVA decision gives all the PTSD ratings.

The veteran's service-connected PTSD has been rated 30 percent disabling from October 1, 1999 to June 30, 2002 under the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 4.130, Diagnostic Code 9411, exclusive of a temporary total hospitalization rating from May 20, 2002 to June 30, 2002. Under this diagnostic code, a 30 rating is assigned for occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks (although generally functioning satisfactorily, with routine behavior, self-care, and conversation normal), due to such symptoms as: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks (weekly or less often), chronic sleep impairment, mild memory loss (such as forgetting names, directions, recent events). A 50 percent rating is assigned for occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short-and long-term memory (e.g. retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; difficulty in establishing effective work and social relationships. 38 C.F.R. § 4.130, Diagnostic Code 9411. A 70 percent rating is assigned for occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood, due to such symptoms as: suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities; speech intermittently illogical, obscure, or irrelevant; near- continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, appropriately and effectively; impaired impulse control (such as unprovoked irritability with periods of violence); spatial disorientation; neglect of personal appearance and hygiene; difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances (including work or a work-like setting); inability to establish and maintain effective relationships. Id. A 100 percent rating is assigned for total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as: gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance or minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name. Id. Rod was meticulous in his personal care and never had a suicidal ideation but I had documented evidence of everything else in the 100% regs.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

From reading your post this is what I gather;

Rod was 30% PTSD from Oct 1, 1999 to June 30, 2002...his amount changed to 100% PTSD exclusive of a temporary total hospitalization during May 20, 2002 to June 30, 2002 (his hospitalization time because of period over 30 days he was rated/payed at the 100% level for 41days(5/20/02-6/30/02)) Is this when he passed away?

So my question is do they temporarly call it extra-schedular awardance past the 30 day hospitalization period? Then if someone goes home revert back to the % they were prior to their hospitalization?

I know when rated 100% when you do not have 100% disabilities, and you don't meet the criteria for 70% with one at least 60% like with TDIU they can change your rating to 100% due to unemployability and it is extraschedular.

So is this what happened here during this time period?

I know if I attended an impatient program for 30 days or more I would be paid at the 100% rate...so it would look like 100% PTSD...so is that what occurred to Rod here? They would not refer to it as TDIU because that was not the award but perhaps they call it just 100% PTSD as schedular temporarily,(for accounting purposes?) yet just list it as 100% PTSD and not schedular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

halos I guess I stated this wrong- he never got temp hosp comp except for the month he was in the PTSD inhouse program

He was granted 100% PTSD P & T SC from Nov 1991 to Oct 1994 when he died. The award was 3 years later posthumous award so it didnt do him any good.He had been 30% SC PTSD since 1983 until 1991 100% EED.

I just thought maybe he had been granted extraschedular but now I realize he was 100% SC PTSD -no extraschedular rating was needed.I finally found the decision.

I think only if the medical evidence does not raise to 100% rating- then- in some cases they might consider extraschedular-??? any comments ??? I really dont understand extraschedular ratings.

But Rod raised to the 100% SC level.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta & halos2 - when someone is hospitalized for 22 days or more they are awarded the 100% rating, for the period they are hospitalized, as w/ptsd programs. Also, back prior to 11/96, a person rated 70%, solely for PTSD, and unable to work was automatically raised to the 100% rate, thereby not needing 4.16a. I believe this changed on or about 11/8/96 and 4.16c was dropped. I believe the extra-schedular rating (4.16b), at least for PTSD, came about around then. Extra-schedular ratings are determined by the Central Office (CO), generally at the recommendation of the RO. Hope this helps. My claim was pending during the 11/96 change and therefore, whichever regulation, was more favorable to me, was used.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An extra-schedular rating is a rating percentage that is awarded to a vet that is above and beyond the maxium level listed for a particular disability.

As an example - if a vet suffers from and is service connected for a (example) lung disease - if the max rating percentage for that disease listed in 38 CFR is 40 percent however, the rating authority for some reason truly believes this disease has caused the vet to really be 70 percent disabled then he or she can recommend that the vet receive the 70 percnet level even though the rating schedule only lists and allows a 40 percent max. Hence the term extra-schedular - a rating for a disability that is above and beyoned the maxium percentage level allowed by 38 CFR.

If the max rating percentage for a disability is 70 percent and the vet's medical evidence truly shows a disability of 50 percent, however, the rater rates him or her at 60 percent that is not extra-schedular. It is simply a judgement call on the raters part that the vet, in the raters opinion/eyes, meets the requirement for the higher rating level.

Both of the situations above are very rare. In the first case my guess would be that it may happen in about 0.5 percent of rating decisions and maybe 0.001 percent of those request are approved.

In the second situation when was the last time you applied for a 30 percent rating for PTSD and the rater came back and said, "nope I disagree with you - I think you are 50 percent disabled from your PTSD - maybe in 0.001 percent of the ratings?

So when you see, hear or think of extra-schedular which, is approved only by Washington, think - a rating percentage that EXCEEDS the max/highest rating percentage for a certain disability category. If the max allowable is 0-60, and you and your evidence think you meet the 30 percent level until you get your rating back and you were awarded 50 percent - sit back and thank your maker and lucky stars cause all you got was lucky not extra-schedular.

I hope I wrote this in an understandable way. Heck sometimes I even confuse myself.

Edited by Clown Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks, Ricky, I forgot that part.

An extra-schedular rating is a rating percentage that is awarded to a vet that is above and beyond the maxium level listed for a particular disability.

As an example - if a vet suffers from and is service connected for a (example) lung disease - if the max rating percentage for that disease listed in 38 CFR is 40 percent however, the rating authority for some reason truly believes this disease has caused the vet to really be 70 percent disabled then he or she can recommend that the vet receive the 70 percnet level even though the rating schedule only lists and allows a 40 percent max. Hence the term extra-schedular - a rating for a disability that is above and beyoned the maxium percentage level allowed by 38 CFR.

If the max rating percentage for a disability is 70 percent and the vet's medical evidence truly shows a disability of 50 percent, however, the rater rates him or her at 60 percent that is not extra-schedular. It is simply a judgement call on the raters part that the vet, in the raters opinion/eyes, meets the requirement for the higher rating level.

Both of the situations above are very rare. In the first case my guess would be that it may happen in about 0.5 percent of rating decisions and maybe 0.001 percent of those request are approved.

In the second situation when was the last time you applied for a 30 percent rating for PTSD and the rater came back and said, "nope I disagree with you - I think you are 50 percent disabled from your PTSD - maybe in 0.001 percent of the ratings?

So when you see, hear or think of extra-schedular which, is approved only by Washington, think - a rating percentage that EXCEEDS the max/highest rating percentage for a certain disability category. If the max allowable is 0-60, and you and your evidence think you meet the 30 percent level until you get your rating back and you were awarded 50 percent - sit back and thank your maker and lucky stars cause all you got was lucky not extra-schedular.

I hope I wrote this in an understandable way. Heck sometimes I even confuse myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use