Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ao

Rate this question


hawkfire27

Question

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

It would help if you listed the reason for his denial. It is listed on the rating decision.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Is your husband rated 100% strictly for PTSD?? If so, did they decide or discuss eligibility for A&A/housebound in their original award letter??? As for the diabetes, submit copies of his prescriptions and the original diagnosis. They were right to deny the diabetes w/o a recorded diagnosis. Never assume the VA has all the VA records from their medical centers.

pr

Hi Everyone,

I was wondering if you could help us out a bit????

My husband is currently 100% SC'ed with PTSD (took over 15 years whew!)

We were trying to add A&A because he is needing my help so much and I am going to have to stop working soon. The VA basically said he can't get A&A for PTSD and he needs to be more disabled, and the VSO suggested getting his other conditions service connected as well to help our chances.. Something we never bothered with because he was already SC'ed 100%.

So we have submitted a claim for a bunch of things, two of which we have been previously denied for. So we got our letter asking for evidence for the following:

Tinnitus

Bilateral Hearing Loss

Migraine Headached

Coronary Artery Disease (Denied 01/16/2002)

Peripheral Neuropathy

Ischemic Heart Disease

Back Pain

Sleep Apnea

Diabetes Mellitus, Type II (Denied 09/06/2002)

Enlarged prostate

Breathing Prolems

Abdominal Pain

Sooooooooo, what I was hoping you can help with is the previous denials. My husband served three tours on the ground in vietnam and basic bathed in Agent Orange! and was denied SC for Diabetes II in 2006. Wasn't this made presumptive in 2001? We need to provide additional evidence because this claim has been closed, but they already have all the evidence and it is presumptive to AO so I don't know what to do about this....Any ideas????

With the Coronary Artery Disease, do you know if this is the same as Ischemic Heart Disease?

My husband's Tinnitus and hearing loss was just diagnosed this year after I convinced him to get it checked because I was sick of yelling at him so he could hear me. The only other hearing tests done were in the millitary, so I don't know how we are going to service connect this, even though he has had it for years and the VA just gave him hearing aids.

I am kind of floundering with this claim because of the previous denials.

Thanks heaps,

Felicity Lynchard

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks to me that the DMII possibly caused his heart disease-but that depends on the medical evidence that his CAD has generated.

You need to dig out his older denials.

Philip is Right- you need to also go over the Evidence list they used to deny to see what was missing.

WHat is the status of this denial? I mean have you formally re-opened yet?

I suggest that you re-open on a 21-4138 form and refer to and attach proof of the DMII diagnosis and meds as Philip said.

Raise the issue that his heart disease is due to the diabetes.

Is there medical evidence that his heart disease pre- dated the DMII diagnosis? If so they will deny CAD due to DMII.

However if it is Ischemic heart disease they would still have to award when the new presumptive for IHD is in the Federal register so raise this as service connected due to the AO DMII and/or Ischemic Heart Disease under the regs proposed by Secretary Shinseki.Raise both issues.

I had similiar claim.My husband died from DMII causing CAD and strokes-ischemic in nature-neither DMII nor Heart disease was diagnosed by the VA.DMII never appeared in his Med recs at all and the CAD was covered up and both were left untreated.My FTCA award for malpractice was 1997.

My award for his direct service connected death for DMII causing and contributing was April 2009.

I confirmed this week with the General Counsel and NVLSP that my EED retro for DIC is Oct ,1994.A lot of the Nehmer cases (AO) depend on past denials in order to get a more favorable EED.

Because of Beverly Nehmer AO widow- and the Court Order that lawyers at NVLSP won years ago.

I am bringing this all up here because you need to do what I did- scour the med recs as carefully as possible to find a DMII diagnosis date, get his Glucose readings and dates too, and then associate that to his heart disease.

ANd then determine if in fact this is ischemic heart disease too- this way you will be well prepared to battle on 2 fronts-

And if there is Nehmer Retro and they dont pay him- I have contacts in DC for how to handle that.

There is potential here for possibly a very favorable EED based on the past denials.

However I am jumping ahead of this-the claim must be re-opened and they will send you a VCAA letter-

However with proof of DMII diagnosis, they could award for that right off the bat-

List his disabilities with DMII first and then the heart disease and PN , and then the rest-on the 21-4138

(You can write them a letter instead of using this form but this form is what they are familiar with)

"With the Coronary Artery Disease, do you know if this is the same as Ischemic Heart Disease?"

Many advocates are concerned about how this will be defined in the new regs-hopefully the regulation will appear soon in the Federal Register4 and we can comment on it-

Was an ECHO done on his heart?

The measurements of an ECHO as well as an ejection fraction and other medical records invoving his CAD can reveal it to be ischemic- in most cases. But not all-

Does he have high lipid profile?

Does he have any diagnosis of atherosclerosis or periphal arterial disease?

Do you have copy of his complete medical records?

As Philip asked- why did they deny him SMC?

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi "F,"

When your husband was awarded 100%, solely due to PTSD, the VA had the duty to decide if he qualified for A&A or Housebound(HB), "as an inferred issue." That failure, to do so, means that claim for A&A/HB remains open and can go back to the original claim/award date. You should pursue that claim vigorously. It's roughly $300 additional a month.

pr

Hi Philip,

Thanks for your reply...

Yes my husband is connected only for PTSD at 100%, they made no mention of A&A in his decision papers/award letter. We will definately include all the Dianosis and prescription info in this new claim!

Thanks,

F Lynchard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philip is right-

I suggest that you definitely claim Ischemic heart disease under the proposed new regulations.

Perhaps an independent endocrinologist would see something in his med recs that was symptomatic of diabetes prior to the CAD.

Also the ECHO could be interpreted as to whether this shows heart disease of ischemic nature- most heart disease is,in fact, ischemia.

The ECHO has percentages that reveal narrowed arterial pressure due to atherosclerosis.

And well as the Ejection Fraction.

I mentioned my situation because I proved my husband was symptomatic of diabetes from 1988 to 1994-as VA patient yet VA never diagnosed him with DMII nor the subsequent IHD the untreated DMII caused.

An Endocrinologist could pick up on these symptoms-

For example the word 'Hyperlipedimia' appeared for the first time during a post death C & P review in a SSOC I got in 1996.

I studied this condition and it became very probative evidence for my undiagnosed DMII claim.

A VA dentist noted odd patches in my husband's mouth 1988-

this was also noted in 1992 hospital records and a diagnosis and treatment of what caused the patches-

This -after I studied this condition for months and months was also probative evidence for my AO death claim.

My husband had odd visual disturbance (on top of daily flashbacks) well documented in an EEOC case he had against the VA.

The VA EEOC testimony said he couldnt read the information correctly to do the job and made many mistakes.

This all because also VERY probative evidence of diabetic involvement to his eyesight.

In 1988 my husband had a heart attack while at the VA that they said was sinus infection-however I proved this heart attack was directly due to DMII which could have been diafgnosed -that day if they had followed up on other tests they never did.

A heart attack is often the very first sign of diabetes.

On the SMC Philip mentioned - check out the Bradley V Peake decision here in Claims Research.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know one of the first places artery disease shows up is in the legs. If you have DMII as a SC condition and you complain about pain in your legs the VA might do a CT scan of your legs. This will show artery disease possibly and if it is in your legs it is probably in your brain and heart as well. I had a lump on my leg and the VA did a CT scan. I was SC for DMII at the time. The CT scan revealed artery disease. I got this SC'ed as secondary to the DMII and they DX'ed it as CAD. This is sort of a back door approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use