Jump to content
  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
carlie

Some Interestings C&ue Claims For Research

Question

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files3/0919324.txt

ORDER

The rating decision of December 1962 contained clear and

unmistakable error by assigning an effective date of June 11,

1962 for the grant of service connection for a right shoulder

disorder, and an effective date of August 10, 1949 is

granted.

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files4/0926735.txt

ORDER

Severance of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A.

§ 1151 for headaches was not proper, and restoration of the

benefit is granted.

Severance of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A.

§ 1151 for a right elbow olecranon contusion was not proper,

and restoration of the benefit is granted.

The following BVA decision does not grant C&UE for anything

but I find the claim very interesting as it shows many different

issues and the why's of why the claims for C&UE have been denied.

This is a long read but worth it for the research.

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files4/0928574.txt

ORDER

There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA Form 21-526,

Veteran's Application for Compensation or Pension, submitted

in February 1945, addressing "Nature of Disease/Injury" for

accrued purposes, and such claim is denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the February 26,

1945, letter from the United States Coast Guard stating the

Veteran was discharged due to "physical disability" for

accrued purposes, and such claim is denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the March 1945

Rating Sheet stating the Veteran's discharge diagnosis was

Constitutional Psychopathic State and VA was to determine

"true diagnosis" for accrued purposes, and such claim is

denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945 VA

Medical Form 2545, Report of Physical Examination stating,

"Illnesses - none" and "Operations - Sinus 1942 Nasal Drip

left side 1943" for accrued purposes, and such claim is

denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945 VA

Medical Form 2545, Report of Physical Examination in

paragraphs 10, 11, 12, and 13 for accrued purposes, and such

claim is denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945 VA

Medical Form 2545, Report of Physical Examination showing a

history of "Constitutional psychopathic state, emotional

instability, had been nervous all of his life, his hands

always shook, he never slept well," and such claim is denied

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945

rating decision, which assigned a 10 percent evaluation for

psychoneurosis, anxiety neurosis, for accrued purposes, and

such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945

rating decision denying service connection for constitutional

psychopath with emotional instability for accrued purposes,

and such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1945

rating decision, which failed to adjudicate claims for

service connection that were reflected in the Veteran's

service treatment records for accrued purposes, and such

claim is dismissed.

There was no was clear and unmistakable error in the April

1947 rating decision reducing the evaluation for

psychoneurosis, anxiety, to noncompensable for accrued

purposes, and such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the April 1947

rating decision noting that the diagnosis of constitutional

psychopath with emotional instability was a constitutional or

developmental defect for VA purposes for accrued purposes,

and such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA's failure to

adjudicate a 1969 claim for increase and a claim for service

connection for hearing loss for accrued purposes, and such

claim is denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA's failure to

adjudicate a 1971 claim for increase for accrued purposes,

and such claim is denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in a January 1977

VA neuropsychiatric screening examination report referencing

a November 1976 report, for accrued purposes, and such claim

is denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in VA's failure to

adjudicate an August 1976 claim for increase for accrued

purposes, and such claim is denied.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the December

1977 rating decision denying service connection for hearing

loss for accrued purposes, and such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994

rating decision denying service connection for multiple

sclerosis for accrued purposes, and such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994

rating decision denying reopening the claim for entitlement

to service connection for hearing loss for accrued purposes,

and such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994

rating decision denying service connection for hypertension,

and such claim is dismissed.

There was no clear and unmistakable error in the October 1994

rating decision denying service connection for tachycardia,

and such claim is dismissed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • SHOW YOUR SUPPORT: Ad Free Subscriptions to the Forum available
      Ad free subscriptions are available for the forum. Subscriptions give you the forums ad free and help support the forum and site. Monthly $5 Annually $50 https://community.hadit.com/subscriptions/

      Every bit helps - Thank you.

       
      • 0 replies
    • Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask
      Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask. Chris Attig - Veterans Law Blog 

      <br style="color:#000000; text-align:start">How to Hire an Attorney For Your VA Claim or Appeal Free Guidebook available on the Veterans Law Blog

      I got an email the other day from a Veteran.  It had 2 or 3 sentences about his claim, and then closed at the end: “Please call me. So-and-so told me you were the best and I want your help.”

      While I appreciate the compliments, I shudder a little at emails like this.  For 2 reasons.

      First, I get a lot of emails like this.  And while I diligently represent my clients – I often tell them we will pursue their claim until we have no more appeals or until we win – I am most assuredly not the best.

      There are a LOT of damn good VA Disability attorneys out there.  (Most, if not all, of the best are members of the National Organization of Veterans Advocates…read about one of them, here)

      Second, I don’t want Veterans to choose their attorney based on who their friend thought was the best.  I want Veterans to choose the VA Disability attorney who is BEST for their case.

      In some situations, that may be the Attig Law Firm.

      But it may also be be Hill and Ponton, or Chisholm-Kilpatrick, or Bergman Moore.  Or any one of the dozens of other attorneys who have made the representation of Veterans their professional life’s work.

      There are hundreds of attorneys that are out there representing Veterans, and I’m here to tell you that who is best for your friend’s case may not be the best for your case.

      How do you Find the Best VA Disability Attorney for your Claim?

      First, you have to answer the question: do you NEED an attorney?

      Some of you don’t...
      • 1 reply
    • VA Emergency Medical Care
      VA Emergency Medical Care
      • 3 replies
    • Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      • 0 replies
    • Thanks Berta for your help. I did receive my 100% today for my IU claim on 6/20/2018. It only took 64 days to complete and it is p&t. Thanks for your words of wisdom. 
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines