Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tonight - Cbs - 60 Minutes

Rate this question


carlie

Question

  • Answers 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I watched the 60 Minutes interview and it only touched the surface of what is going on at the VA. It is time out for talking about what is going on at the VA. There need to be some action. Veterans need to flood the President's email and make calls, tie up the lines. I am a member of DAV, American Legion, AMVET and NABVETS. My question to them is why aren't they making a stink about this right now? It is left up to Veterans to get angry, think, come together and speak louder than 60 Minutes! We are the ones that are hurting! Do you know that every time a Veteran get denied, it takes you into a deeper depressive state. It makes you want to hurt someone! But if we do, we go to jail. We need to stop the madness concerning this bonuses or like the Veteran said for Benefits for Denials. That Undersecretary must not be a Veteran that is disabled. I don't know about anyone else but it gets my goat every time my fellow Veteran talk about after waiting forever they are denied. Most things that happen to a person doesn't get documented while you are in the military. You are passed through like cattle, made to feel like a number. But through it all we serve faithfully and most Veterans are proud to have served and is still serving each other and our families. We can not wait for somebody to help us, we must help ourselves! Veterans helping Veterans that is the only way things will change! Thank you for allowing me to vent! QueenB

"You have nothing if you never ask for anything!"

QueenBonita

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I watched the program and what came through for me is the lack of finding the info within the documentation. Also how long the application is.

Is there a way of offering an application that allows the veteran to have the evidence more easily mentioned specifically on the application?

I mean my website is a great tool for veterans but if the evidence side of it could be translated into the application itself where the proofs could be listed and the veteran wouldn't have to try to compose an attachment, then the VA employee could just check the list of proofs against the documentation.

Too bad there isn't a list of disabilities that a veteran could check off in the application and then have the list of proofs mentioned under that rating that the employee could then verify from documentation.

Maybe could be the long and short version like a tax form. For those who have all their evidence they do what I suggest above.

For the short version, still check off the disabilities and then mention doctors/treatment centers for the disability.

I mention a checkoff list because until I started actually researching the list of disabilities I wasn't aware of a lot of pertinent ratings.

Anyway, just a thought.

Makes me glad I created that website. Maybe some veterans will have an easier time of it.

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I read the transcript and it's been edited.

pr

The transcript for the program is here for those that didn't get to see it. I agree with every statement in this post so far. This transcript will probably be dumped pretty soon.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/01/...ain;contentBody

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul Sullivan and Doug Rosinski-I am pretty sure they were both guests at SVR radio -and some of you here know them via emails or phone too-etc-

Doug won that famous Mega award at the CAVC last year ( maybe the big Mandamus writ case?)and Paul is Exec Director of Veterans for Common Sense.

These guys are superb attorneys.

They should have had more time on the show-and an extra hour or more for other vets with claims problems.But the 6 months decision thing Doug brought up- as we all know- only occurs

1. if a vet gets a legal VCAA letter right away and can manage to send them what they need fast on a clear case of potential award. Such as Vietnam service- claim for DMII- a no brainer.A proper decision might come in 6 months.A big MIGHT.

2. decisions that arrive within 6 months of filing- (I dont think many do get done that fast) are usually denials that force the vet into the claims process for years.

This 6 month mantra even appears during many H VAC hearings- I really wonder how anyone got the idea that claims are being processed and 'decided' within 6 months.

I think usually "denied" in 6 months is more realistic.

The 2 examples with the 2 veterans (one who could not prove service n Vietnam) and the other vet's case were only a brief example of the countless types of claims problems that vets are having.

Michael Walcoff's statements -as we all know- do NOT reflect the system in action at all.He says the same blah blah blah at the hearings-

As QueenB said here-this was only a mere glimpse of the reality of the VA claims process.

No solutions were offered as I recall and the general public might have still been thinking about the Broncos loss and really didnt pay much attention to the show.(How about that last minute interception-I was trying to figure out if the Broncos could somehow get 3 touchdowns and conversion points in 4 minutes and win -it was 44-24 at that point-24 plus 21=45)

To have a show on this serious matter after a football game-possibly didn't get the attention it deserved.

The claims process is a National travesty and an utter disgrace and it will be inherited the active military we have now unless something is done about it.I wish the show had made that point.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello All Hope All Is Well.


For a news journalist he did not do his HOMEWORK,never even mentioned SPOLIATION OF RECORDS,and yet they mentioned burden of proof is on the VETERAN? Disappointing to say the least as for the HIGH PRICED BELL HOIPS IN WASHINGTON DC THEY TO HAVE NERVE KNOWING THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN UNQUOTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use