Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

C+p Exam


Hello All Hope All Is Well.

My Question is during all of my C+P Exams I have never seen or reviewed my C-File for this exam and yet the examiner always states that it was present.

Anyone else expierence this process?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts


7. Requesting a Medical Opinion or Examination

Introduction This topic contains information on requesting a medical opinion or examination to develop claims, including

• VA's responsibility to provide medical examinations or obtain medical opinions for the claimant

• when to request a medical opinion or examination

• when to request a medical opinion versus an examination

• stating requests clearly

• what the opinion request needs to contain, and

• the importance of identifying evidence relevant to the request.

a. VA's Responsibility In claims for disability compensation, assist the claimant by providing a medical opinion or examination when the opinion or examination is necessary to make a decision on the claim.

b. When to Request a Medical Opinion or examination A medical opinion or examination may be necessary when, after the development of all other relevant evidence, including the statement of the claimant, the file

• contains competent medical evidence that the claimant has a current disability, or

• contains competent evidence that the claimant has persistent or recurrent symptoms of disability

Note: A claimant is competent to describe symptoms of disability that he/she is experiencing, such as pain in the knee. However, because a claimant ordinarily lacks medical training and experience he/she would not be competent to diagnose his/her own medical condition or offer a medical opinion.

• contains supporting evidence from service records or other sources that the claimant suffered an event(s), injury, or disease in service that may be associated with the claimant's current disability or symptoms of disability, and

• does not contain sufficient medical evidence to make a decision on the claim.

c. When to Request a Medical Opinion versus an Examination A medical opinion versus an examination should be requested when only the following is necessary to decide the claim:

• Reconciliation of different diagnoses

• Opinion concerning the relationship between two conditions

• Opinion about functional impairment

• Etiology and nexus opinions

• Allen v. Brown cases (e.g., when the issue is whether a service-connected condition has aggravated a non-service connected condition)

• Independent medical opinions

• Opinion regarding the extent to which service-connected disabilities affect the veteran's ability to perform physical and non-physical tasks in order for VA to determine whether the veteran is unemployable.

Note: Many opinion requests require information that would be gleaned as part of the normal examination process which the physician should not be precluded from conducting, if necessary.

d. Stating Requests Clearly When seeking a medical opinion

• be very clear about what information or opinion is being requested

• send the following to the medical examiner:

• the claims folder, and

• the opinion request


• direct the medical examiner to

• review it, and

• provide a rationale for any opinion.

e. What the Medical Opinion Request Must Contain The medical opinion request should clearly state the nature of what is needed. The requester must clearly indicate if he/she

• wants an opinion on the etiology of the condition

• requires the physician to reconcile differing opinions, or

• wants any other medical opinion.

It is not adequate to merely refer the examiner to the claims folder containing Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) remand instructions. However, there is no prohibition from quoting the BVA instructions as long as the instructions are clear about whether a medical opinion is required.

f. Importance of Identifying Evidence The requester should identify the available evidence to assist the physician in focusing his/her review. The evidence should be tagged in the claims folder, but the examiner must be advised that he/she is not limited to reviewing only this evidence.

Note: Avoid the potential problem of steering the examiner to review only the evidence pre-selected as relevant since a medical professional may have a differing opinion as to what evidence is relevant and must not be limited in the record review.

The identification of the evidence must include a general description of it, indicating the

• source

• approximate dates, and

• subject matter.

Edited by allan

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had A C&P exam for PN last Nov. Didn't see my C file and didn't ask. Got a copy of the exam report and was suprised to see the following. C-FILE REVIEW : Not requested by VARO.

The examiner did review my medical records. She also reviewed 21 pages of medical records from my pvt neurologist (I took a copy just in case ). She scanned his records into my VA records and said they should have been there since I had given them to my PCP and submitted them with my claim.

She also used his findings in her report. thank God for a Vet friendly Doc.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allan - Thanks for doing the legal research and posting it for us.

John - Thanks for letting us know that your C&P examiner not only reviewed your records but also scanned them into your VA records. I agree, a vet friendly doctor is a blessing.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My last C&P exam fell on "Black Friday" ( the day after Thanksgiving ) The fng doctor with less than two years of experience, treated me like I was an annoyance and the scowl on her young face showed her disapproval of having to work on a long Holiday weekend. Though I did not see my file during the 20 min. exam, I did notice her slouch out of her office with a massive volume of one of my files with her, as well as a look of disgust on her face.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know VARO physically sent my file to the VAMC where the C&P exams were done. But my file is some 5" or 6" thick and I sure as heck didn't see anything like that present in the room in either of my last two exams. It is possible they reviewed it prior to the exams. My medical records were available on the computer. They stated repeatedly that the records were reviewed


The exam reports were so horribly falsified there's no telling if they bothered to read it or not. I was able to rebut many of their statements with nearly 30 pages from my file. (I did have a recent copy) I mean they stated I did not have any special shoe inserts when I wore them to the exams and the authority for their custom fitting was in my VA med records. They said I had no unusual shoe wear when the shoes I wore were so worn and there were photos of three such pairs of shoes in my C file. They said my gait was steady and even in the same report they described my gait as being antalgic. Even so, my med records have a statement that I had "Trendelenberg Lurch." The report said my X-ray report did not indicate hallas valgus when the report did in fact say there was...

The list goes on and on...

Did they bother to read my file? Perhaps. They sure denied a lot of things my file said I claimed were wrong. Moreso than can be accounted for by chance. They knew specifically what to address.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.


      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.


      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.








      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.


      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.

      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.

      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law

      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual

      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures

      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation

      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.


      The report is here:


      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.



      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines