Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vets Rep Law Firm

Rate this question


carlie

Question

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

Berta -

I did not see anywhere that they claim to be a Veterans organization.

They do state at the website,

"You’ll find Advocates and other Specialists who are experts in dealing with the laws involving all different kinds of disabilities here…along with secretaries, and clerks, and receptionists.

The Rep For Vets™ is not a charity, nor are we a non-profit organization. Our fees are set by the government."

I cant state exactly what that means - but it reads to me like they would

be allowed to rep vets since their fees are set by the goober-mint then

wouldn't they have to be in compliance with vets rules in 38 USC ?

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would NEVER recommend to a Veteran they hire someone to represent them who is NOT a lawyer. VSO's and hadit advice is free, and is probably as good or better than any NON lawyer can provide to you.

I am personally aware of basically a retired VSO who now charges a fee to represent Vets, who is not a lawyer. I dont recommend hiring one of those guys.

broncovet,

Well, whatever they are, it's a source of information that I

have provided that MAY help a VBA Claimant currently in the process

of seeking help with their VBA claims issues.

Hadit very often has members posting topics and researching sources

to help in obtaining their benefits.

I, in no way provided a recommendation, simply shared the information.

In fact I posted,

"I do not know anyone that has dealt with this law firm.

I have just seen it on tv - this is the first ad I've seen."

I recently requested that you,

"Do not continue to denigrate my topics and threads.

If you want a podium for your platform, either write your congress critters

or at least have the courtesy to start your own topic."

I feel that if you weren't aware that you were in fact doing this again,

then you would not have offered up an apology in advance.

My edit function works just fine and this is the last time that

I will make this same request of you.

Also, FYI - it is irrelevant to me,as to whatever other web site

or Forum you make a choice to copy and paste my response into.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this company is the same as Allsup, who helps clients get social security. I used them to win Social Security Benefits and they were very good. It sounds like they are now in the VA claim business. They never use a lawyer until and if the claim needs to be appealed. They are right in that they can only charge you what the government allows. I'd try a NOVA vet rep first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I believe this company is the same as Allsup, who helps clients get social security. I used them to win Social Security Benefits and they were very good. It sounds like they are now in the VA claim business. They never use a lawyer until and if the claim needs to be appealed. They are right in that they can only charge you what the government allows. I'd try a NOVA vet rep first.

NOVA lawyers are usually self employed the group is mostly a brain trust where they share ideas on how to handle legal issues with the VA, they have many lawyers that have decades of experience in the VA system, and as we all know the VA is constantly rewriting the rules, more often than the Social Security Adminsitration does, the VA laws are always being changed and to keep up with them they meet quarterly and discuss the changes and how it affects their work on veterans behalf

the lawyer I had that helped me did it "pro bono" as my denial was before the June 2007 effective date so legally they couldn't charge me, but with her help I "won" the case, she even paid for a IMO at the last minute that she felt would help, and it did she collected when I got the back pay I was more than willing to pay the 20% and she stated that it wasn't ethical and refused it wouldn't even let me take her and her spouse to a nice lunch

there are times that lawyers are needed and I can not say enough how good the NOVA lawyers are I would never hesitate to recommend them to another veteran I have plenty of bad things to say about service organizations I have nothing bad to say about NOVA and the lawyers that belong to it I think they are one of the best assets that disabled veterans have access to we were well prepared for the BVA hearing it was not a 15 minute before the hearing where you first meet the SO that is going to be presenting your case to the judge and they don't know you or your case and they will only know whats on the papers in your file, which they haven't even had time to read let alone feel comfortable that they know the details of your problems I felt going in I was going to win, with the SOs that had been handling my claim previous to that day, I always felt like "what the hell is next" on Feb 4 2009 with the lawyer I was "comfortable" with my rep she knew my arguments and my case, she had been dealing with it she knew my C File probably better than I did all 6 feet of it she own my appeal after SOs from AL, DAV, PVA all had told me that I would never get CAD and hypertension SC secondary to PTSD they didn't see any reason to work on it because they had the preconceived idea that my claim was dead on arrival, the lawyer found the right words and right IMOs to make it a winner

like I said paying the 20% legal fees to win is worth it

100% of nothing is still no dollars with her I got more than 20,000 in back pay I am very happy with a lawyer and yes I would still pay her the 20% she earned it

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOVA has an excellent group of lawyers-accredited with the VA-

this repforvet group is not affiliated at all with NOVA (National Organization of Veterans Advocates)

They could certainly be legit but I dont see from their site how they can represent veterans unless they are all accredited with VA and/or are lawyers who have complied with the criteria as a lawyer to represent a vet.

A personal lawyer I have handled a land lease for me and then being a vet himself found I had claim pending and was anxious to represent me with the VA.

When I sent him the criteria for that type of representation (I had actually just discussed the lawyer for vets regs with the actual VA lawyer who had written them in VACO DC due to another matter)

then my lease lawyer dropped his idea to represent me.

Maybe I will contact this site and find out what type of accreditation they have- they could be legit-but their site doesnt give much info on them.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What better people to handle your claim!!! They know exactly how to get a claim approved and probably in the shortest amount of time. Plus they probably have friends inside the VA. Think about it. Claims filed by them would be properly prepared and could be adjucated quickly, earning the adjudicator work product credits, with little work. Sweet!!! jmo

pr

Whan I saw the commercial I wondered if it was a bunch of VA retirees that are now advocating for the other side. Similar to the IRS/TAX representation companies that hire former IRS. When i looked at the web site I could find no information on what makes them better/different. It wouldn't suprise me to find some VA retirees start a company hire 1-2 lawyers and then start cutting deals/pressuring people they used to supervise ( I know the illegal things you did) into granting benefits. But this does not appear to be happening yet.

I guess the ultimate question is "would you ever let a for profit company filled with former VA execs take over your calim"? Would we start letting people who screwed us for years take 20% if we thought they could get our claim approved?

I know an ugly hypothetical question, but will would it ever happen?

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use