Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Corruption Found At


Berta

Recommended Posts

I do not now how the va works but I worked for IRS we had access to the internet and belieave me if you even tried to get on one of those sites they will now and you will fired on the spot, I for one do not belieave that a federal goverment employee will get on a porn site and the VA not even knowing it.

If you read the whole report with redactions

a VA employee even admits to spending some of

his time at work viewing porno on his VA computer.

OH - WOW, now their going to put a block on his computer -

why the hell aren't all VA computers

blocked from things like - ummm, non work related web sites ? ? ?

carlie

http://www4.va.gov/oig/51/FY2010rpts/VAOIG-09-01492-83.pdf

"Issue 7:

Whether Misused His VA-Issued Computer The Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch state that an employee has a duty to protect and conserve Government property and shall not use such property, or allow its use, for other than authorized purposes.

5 CFR § 2635.704 (a). VA policy requires employees to conduct themselves professionally in the workplace and to refrain from using Government office equipment for activities that are inappropriate in VA Directive 6001. The policy expressly prohibits employees from using VA computer systems for creating, downloading, viewing, storing, copying, or transmitting of sexually explicit or sexually oriented materials.

VA Directive 6001, Paragraph 2 © (5).

Federal regulations state that employees will furnish information and testify freely and honestly in cases respecting employment and disciplinary matters. Refusal to testify, concealment of material facts, or willfully inaccurate testimony in connection with an investigation or hearing may be grounds for disciplinary action. 38 CFR § 0.735.12.

During the course of our investigation, we conducted a forensic examination

of a VA- (:)(6)owned computer issued to ,

and we discovered approximately 2,600 images depicting partial or full adult nudity and/or sexual activity.

The images were located on the computer under his user profile, and a Site Frequency and Internet History Report revealed that used the computer to visit multiple internet websites that promoted and/or displayed images of nudity or sexual activity. A query of the Active Directory reflected that the VA network user ID assigned to was used. (OIG Forensic Laboratory Report, p. 3, dated 9/23/2009.)

told us that he read and signed, each year, the National Rules of Behavior for VA computer systems, which informs employees of improper computer use.

Initially, expressly denied that he used his VA-issued computer to view pornography. After we informed of our forensic examination results, said that he did not recall going to pornographic websites, and he suggested to us that the images we found may be part of an email or a Facebook picture. Throughout his interview, denied accessing pornographic websites; however he eventually said that he had viewed pornography on “a computer;” that he traveled a lot; and that he could not recall specific pornographic images that he may have viewed on a “work” computer versus his “personal” computer.

further said, “If the images are there and the

VA Office of Inspector General 28

Administrative Investigation - Abuse of Authority, Misuse of Position and Resources, Acceptance of

Gratuities, and Interference with an IG Investigation National Programs & Special Events, VACO

forensics support that, then they must be there.” finally told us that he (B)(6)viewed pornography on the VA computer; that it was “possible” that he viewed it within the past 6 months; but that he could not recall specific dates and times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Another case of scandal needs to be put into its proper forum.

Has anyone verified the source.

I am moving it to the correct forum.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would suggest that all go to VAwatchdog.org for a complete report on the most recent VACO scandle, porno and contracting are not all what about the 21K Hartman is being accessed for inappropriate use of compensatory time. This jerk should be indicted and then do time. The VAOIG report is worth a complete read. Also the article regarding Chief Justice Roberts comments on the appeals process is worth a read.

SgtAGMOB,

The same link VA Watchdog has to the whole story

has already been posted in this thread.

http://www4.va.gov/oig/51/FY2010rpts/VAOIG-09-01492-83.pdf

carlie

Edited by carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I wonder if the VA took Veterans who are on Medicare and bought them supplemental insurance how much money would be saved and how much better the VA could treat all the Veterans who don;t have Insurance

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

JMHO... Although this is a salacious diversion from the real wrong doings at the VA, Ms. Hartman's actions and cover up tactics are indicative of business as usual for this bureaucracy.

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I see the real corruption issue at the VA as the systematic denial and low balling of many thousands of good claims over the last 40 years or longer. The poor trusting vet walks into the VBA system with a claim for benefits not knowing he/she is walking into the lion's den. The C&P doctor's and all other VA doctors and officials should have to read you your rights against self incrimination each time they talk to you. Does the average vet know that the off hand remark he makes to a doctor can often be used to deny a claim? The VA can and will go on a fishing expedition ignoring tons of medical information that would support a claim or increase to spotlight one phrase that they use to deny. This is the real corruption.

For instance, I responded to a leading question about ever having a scuffle in high school form a C&P doctor years ago. I said "yes, I did get into a fight in high school" and the doctor used that remark to say I was a personality disorder. The VA has gone back to that simple statement time and again to try and deny my claims for increase to bona fide mental condition. It did not work but costs me money to get IMO's to fight the issue. This is a type of corrupt practice since I am sure the prostitute C&P doctor was asking such questions on behalf of the VBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use