Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chapter 35 Retro

Rate this question


Philip Rogers

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Has anyone here received DEA Chap 35 benefits, retroactively??? They just keep jerking us around. I won a CUE claim, in 2009, for P&T back to 1989. This allows a Chap 35 award for my daughter, who was between 18-26yo, in '89. The starting date, under the first finds rule, should allow her to choose 1989, 2009 or any date in between. The VA is saying that because she first filed in 2003 and was denied they can only go back to 2002, one year prior to her filing. I believe that issue is moot, as the CUE voided any decisions prior to the CUE award, including her first filed date of 2003. They are using 38 CFR 21.4131 and saying they can't pay for classes attended from 9/93 - 6/98. Here's a link to 38 CFR 21.4131: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/21-commencing-dates-19777975. Additionally there are a few date typos that are confusing in the SSOC, she recently received. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!!!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Recently they sent her "pick your date letter"-I got one myself a month ago-

the dates have to be carefully thought over sometimes-

if I had picked the most favorable beginning date for my new DEA entitlement- I could have picked a date which was out of the retro time frame.

VA is determining the balance of my retro now and I had to pick the beginning date so I used date of the first course I took after my past DEA ran out. Otherwise I think DEA would have snookered me out of some retro.:)

Thanks for posting all this- I need to preuse all of it-

DEA can get confusing and VA Edu Dept can be an oxymoron sometimes.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta - the more I read the more confused I get. I'm going over that BVA case you referred me to, in addition to the precedent I posted previously.

I know she's entitled to the period from '93-'98 but want to be sure I don't screw up any appeal rights she may have, should I be wrong. We've already been dealing w/this for 7 yrs.

pr

Recently they sent her "pick your date letter"-I got one myself a month ago-

the dates have to be carefully thought over sometimes-

if I had picked the most favorable beginning date for my new DEA entitlement- I could have picked a date which was out of the retro time frame.

VA is determining the balance of my retro now and I had to pick the beginning date so I used date of the first course I took after my past DEA ran out. Otherwise I think DEA would have snookered me out of some retro.:)

Thanks for posting all this- I need to preuse all of it-

DEA can get confusing and VA Edu Dept can be an oxymoron sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philip-somewhere here I mentioned that-when my award letter changed my Chap 35 eligiblity dates-

I received a letter asking me to pick the beginning date-for the new elgiblity- I think your daughter got letter like that?

My school messed up the paperwork-not VA Edu- and finally straightened that out-

I picked s atart date that did cut into the new 10 year award date (widows get 10 years from entitlement date)

because the start date had to cover the retro they owed me when my prior elgibility ran out.

Does that make sense and would this apply to your daughter?

In other words-my Chap 35 ran out in Dec 2004 but I continued school the next semester -paying for it the next 3 years on my own.So I picked the start date to cover the very first tuition payment I made-After the older eligibilty period ran out because I felt any other date would have not made me eligible for the entire college retro for 4 years.

It worked as I got the check yesterday. When they heard from my school (the problem I had was not with VA on this) they immediately processed my retro.

I dont have the letter yet so I dont know if the amount is correct but maybe this will help someone here-

Chapter 35 regulations are difficult to comprehend.

For anyone who receives a new entitlement date-they have to be careful when they pick the start date for the new entitlement.

If I had picked a start date within the eligibility period that did Not supercede the course dates for what I paid for myself in 2004,05,06,07-then VA could have easily snookered me out of those Chapter 35 retro payments.In my opinion.

Does anyone here have any Chap 35 situation like this?

Asking us to pick our own start dates -to me- could easily cause someone to lose out on thousdands in Chap 35 retro if they pick the wrong date.

Maybe when the letter comes I will have more info -a big problem with Chap 35 is not only are the regs convoluted

but I have yet to meet any vet rep or NSO who understands them.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning a CUE claim tolls everything that came about before the CUE win.

The VA is not allowed to deprive anyone of their benefits that would have been available back on the new effective date, as the result of a VA mistake...

If your kid was going to college during the effected time frame, between now and back to the new effective date, the VA is screwed.

Administrative errors by the VARO don't cause anyone to lose anything.

But, it will probably take some time to receive it.

That's the VA.

I suspect 2 of my college graduated kids will be chasing their retro when the administrative errors in my case are recognized and corrected.

So far, just recently recognized (March, 2010).

Waiting on the correction.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta - My successful CUE(6/09) awarded her DEA benefits but she had first applied in '03 and now they are saying her award can only be from '02, if she wants to use them. They say she could claim an earlier date and they would allow it but not pay any money. I feel the successful CUE wiped out/voided the '03 application and she has a choice of my original claim/award date, the date of her notification, of the award from my CUE, or any date, in between, she chooses. She's tired of the fight, at this point.

On your claim, did you get DEA from both spouses? In my 6/09 successful CUE they failed to award my ex DEA benefits, so I feel I have another appeal to process. She should be able to collect for classes, we paid for, from '91-'94. Thanks!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use