Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dea Benefit Cue?

Rate this question


hawkfire27

Question

Hi all I have recently posted regarding my DEA benefits being denied based on the fact that the eligibility period of ten years had ended. However we weren't married and therefore I was not an eligible person at that time so I could not have eligibility determined.

Wellllllllllll. The congressman got involved and I received a statement of case which shows they did not review thee vidence I sent in in support of my claim, and that they continue to deny me.

"Evidence:

The veteran C&P record (No mention of any other evidence I put in, though the rep on the phone says my evidence was adjudicated on the 19th October last year)

Decision:

The denial of DEA was correct

Reasons and bases:

The Spouse of a veteran that was found ot have total and service connected disability for VA purposes has 10 years to use DEA benefits. VA cannot extend the 10-year period based on date of veterans marriage.

The Rating Decision in veteran's C&P file reflects the date of rating as July 1996 and the vet was notified on September 1996. A spouse of this veteran could begin utilizing DEA benefits as late as September 1996. Therefore the 10 year eligibility period ran out on September 2006.

The date of marriage has no bearing on the veterans determination for DEA benefits... The date of marriage is use solely to determine the earliest a claimant can receive DEA benefits if eligibility is established. Education benefits can not be paid prior to the date of marriage. Even though the claimant was not married to the veteran when VA determined the veteran 100% SC disability, the claimant is still bound by the 10 year eligibility period for spouses. Denial of DEA benefits was appropriate."

Any thoughts?

Edited by hawkfire27

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

How Long Are You Eligible?

Veteran's Disability

If you're a spouse and you're eligible because the veteran has a permanent and total service-connected disability, benefits generally end 10 years from one of the following dates:

effective date of the veteran's permanent and total disability evaluation

date VA notifies the veteran of the permanent and total disability evaluation

beginning date you choose, between the date you become eligible and the date VA notifies the veteran of the permanent and total disability evaluation

I am way confused; Chapter 35 is connected to the veterans' 100% SC P&T award and not when a veteran gets married. If the veteran was awarded in 1996 the spouse would have until 2006, if you were not married to the veteran at the time of the award and then later married the veteran in 2009 then I don't see how you could be entitled to the chapter 35. Very interesting and I would really like to hear other opinions.

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I married my vet in 2009.

I am basing my appeal on the Cypert vs. Peake case, were the Court of Appeal agreed that in order to be eligible for DEA benefits in the first place you have to be an eligible person. The VA is stating I was eligible for benefits in 1996 until 2006, but this is not possible because I didn't become an eligible person until january 2009.

The Cypert vs Peake case mentioned above was found in favor of the vets spouse and she was entitled to DEA benefits, her situation was almost identical to mine.

Anyway, now I have to do the whole Form 9 process, but I have never been through this process before. What type of hearing should I request, video conference or VARO hearing???

Also could the fact that they did not consider (or state) all evidence on the SOC be cause for a CUE?

Edited by hawkfire27

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

OK I get it, you are saying that you became an eligible spouse the day you got married.

unfortunately, your claim may have to go higher than the local VARO. I hope I am wrong but we all know that for some reason claims get awarded at the BVA level and higher that should have been awarded when the veteran or their family members applied for it

As Always Hope the Best and please keep us inform.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would request a DRO hearing and present the Cypert v. Peake case at the hearing. I agree, you became an eligible person in 2009 and it should expire 2019.

pr

I married my vet in 2009.

I am basing my appeal on the Cypert vs. Peake case, were the Court of Appeal agreed that in order to be eligible for DEA benefits in the first place you have to be an eligible person. The VA is stating I was eligible for benefits in 1996 until 2006, but this is not possible because I didn't become an eligible person until january 2009.

The Cypert vs Peake case mentioned above was found in favor of the vets spouse and she was entitled to DEA benefits, her situation was almost identical to mine.

Anyway, now I have to do the whole Form 9 process, but I have never been through this process before. What type of hearing should I request, video conference or VARO hearing???

Also could the fact that they did not consider (or state) all evidence on the SOC be cause for a CUE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input hadit members! :rolleyes:

One problem. I would request a DRO hearing but I only have 60 days to submit my appeal to the BVA.

________________________

VA writes (with the SOC in response to NOD)

You must file this appeal within sixty days from the date of the letter or within the remainder, if any of the one year period from the date of the letter notifying you of the action you are appealing. (Both date end on about 60 days) If we do not hear from you within this period, we will close your case.

Further on: PLease incdicate on the supplied VA Form 9 whether or not you would like a hearing and the type of hearing you would like, if any.

Even further on: After we recieve you appeal we will send it on to the BVA in Washington DC for a decision. The BVA will base its decision on an independent review of the entire record, includng the transcript of the hearing, if you have a hearing.

__________________________

OK soI'm trying to figure out how to get a DRO in the 60 day time frame and still have time to file an appeal to the BVA with a BVA hearing, if the DRO doesn't help me.

Any ideas anyone???? I live in the middle of nowhere and the local VSO has no idea about DEA benefits or claims and gave me the number of someone about 4 hours drive away....So I'm kinda stuck. Please help?

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use