Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

bestbarber00

Patella Femoral Syndrome

Recommended Posts

I received a decison in dated January 21, 2010 granting service connection for Bilateral Patella Femoral Syndrome of the Knees with a 0 percent evaluation effective March 5, 2003, which is the date my claim was reopened. It is rated analagous under 5261(Leg, Limitation of Extension of). The last C&P Exam radiology report included:

Report:

(Right Knee)Mild spur formation of the patella noted. No joint fluid noted. Narrowing of the patellofemoral joint also not.

(Left Knee)Mild spur formation of patella noted. no joint fluid noted. Narrowing of patellofemoral joint noted along the lateral segment.

Impression:

Mild spur formation of bilateral pafellofemoral joints noted. No significant arthritis.

Primary Diagnostic Code: NO SIGNIFICANT ABNORMALITY

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

RANGE OF MOTION for Bilateral knees are:

ACTIVE MOTION AGAINST GRAVITY: 0 to 120 Degrees

Pain Begins At: 120 Degrees

Pain Ends At: 100 Degrees

PASSIVE ROM: 0 to 120 Degrees

Pain Begins At: 120 Degrees

Pain Ends At: 100 Degrees

ROM AGAINST STRONG RESISTANCE: 0 to 120 Degrees

Pain Begins At: 120 Degrees

Pain Ends At: 100

ADDITIONAL LOM ON REPETITIVE USE: Yes

LOM ON REPETITIVE USE: 0 to 100 Degrees

FACTOR MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL LOM: Pain

SUMMARY OF GENERAL JOINT CONDITIONS

CONDITION: (Bilateral) - Crepitus, Edema, Painful Movement, Guarding of Movement

CLICKS OR SNAPS: (Bilateral) - Yes

Should I be entitled to compensation for x-ray evidence of arthritis, even though not signifcant, with limitation of motion even though the limitation of motion is noncompensable. Also, with functional loss, when you apply 38 C.F.R sections 4.40, 4.45, and 4.59(Painful Motion), should I be entitled to the least minimum compensable rating for the joint with limitation of motion. PLEASE HELP ME?

My bilateral knee condtion has been diagnosed as:

Bilateral Medial Collateral & SubPatella Strain - (Army Physician Jan. 1998)

Popping Bilateral Knees - (Army Physician May 1998)

Patella Femoral Sydrome with Enthesopathy - (Private Physician May and Nov. 2002)

Right Knee Degeneration in Medial Meniscus/Bone Island in femur - (Private Physician Jan. 2003)

Patella Tendonitis - (VA Exam. Dec. 2003)

Degenerative Joint Disease - (Private Physician Jul. 2004)

Patella Femoral Syndrome(Chondromalacia) by Private PhysicianPatella Tendonitis by VA in 2003

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

I suggest you go to the BVA web site for similiar cases like this one:

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp10/files1/1004236.txt

to see how your evidence could possibly involve a higher rating.I am not sure if arthitis would affect the rating- was the arthritis claimed as secondary or an aggravating NSC factor that aggravated a SC condition?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines