Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question 

 Click To Read Current Posts  

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Bva And Relaxed Stressor

Rate this question


Berta

Question

On May 17th,2010 the BVA made these 2 decisions referencing th new stressor criteria. These might help someone here understand the new regs.

Case # 1

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp10/files1/1008493.txt

“The provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1154(:huh: do not allow a combat

veteran to establish service connection with lay testimony

alone, however. Rather, the statute relaxes the evidentiary

requirements for proving certain events alleged to have

occurred during service when there is no official record. It

cannot be used to etiologically link the alleged service

event to a current disability. Gregory v. Brown, 8 Vet. App.

563, 567 (1996).”

“Because the response from the Vet Center did not specifically

document what efforts it took to locate the Veteran's claimed

treatment reports, and in order to give the appellant every

consideration with respect to the present appeal and to

ensure due process, it is the Board's opinion that further

development of the case is necessary.

Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action:” etc

remanded due to what appears to be DTA error.

CXase #2

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp10/files1/1008955.txt

"The Board notes that the Veteran has not alleged stressors

related to combat exposure, and service records show no

evidence of combat exposure. Based upon this evidence, the

Board finds that the Veteran is not entitled to the relaxed

evidentiary standard of proof regarding events that occurred

during combat pursuant to 38 U.S.C.A. § 1154(B), and

verification of his alleged PTSD stressors is required for

service connection to be granted in this case. See 38 C.F.R.

§ 3.304(f) (2009); Zarycki, 6 Vet. App. at 93; see also

Collette v. Brown, 82 F.3d 389 (1996). A review of the

service records shows the Veteran served as an ordnance

mechanic aboard the USS Kittyhawk. Service treatment records

show sutures for a head laceration in June 1972.

The Board has considered all available evidence in evaluating

the Veteran's claim, and the Board finds the evidence of

record to be sufficient to corroborate the Veteran's

stressors. Because the Veteran has a diagnosis of PTSD

linked to a corroborated, in-service stressor, the Board

finds that service connection for PTSD is warranted.

ORDER

Service connection for PTSD is granted."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use