Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Nehmer

Rate this question


VNVetwife

Question

My husband had a heart attack in 2005,had stints put in , also was diagnosed with IHD. He didn't file claim,because it wasn't on AO list. Then in 2006 ,he was diagnosed with DMII ,, he filed on this , { and PTSD,he has always been bothered with PTSD, nightmares,flashbacks , etc,,.ever since he came back from Vietnam , he was, different as night and day when he came back home , ,but wouldn't go to VA for help }... Doctors took him out of work in 2006 , applied for SSDI,, sent all private doctors records in, and was approved for that. VA approved him 20% DMII , 30% PTSD.In that letter ,it stated they couldn't approve heart , secondary to DMII , because heart attack came first , before diabetes......What I was wondering ,would that come under Nehmer,since they referred to the heart in the approval letter , but denied it secondary to DMII , because heart attack was first. I was reading on some posts on VBN and they were talking about { inferred claims } , whatever that means,didn't really understand about all that........If anyone wants to have an opinion or answer , I would appreciate it very much. WE will just be happy if they approve these new persumtives ,,,maybe that would raise his rating enough that he would get his meds, without a co-pay , that would help a ton..,,,He takes 4 BP meds a day ,not counting all the rest of his meds , has acid reflux , artheritis ,etc.He does get diabetes meds and testing strips , without co-pay because of SC. Any help on this ?? ,,Just let me know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Your husband should file immediatly if not sooner for his heart disease. The longer you wait the more money you will lose. They are giving C and P exams now for IHD.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your husband should file immediatly if not sooner for his heart disease. The longer you wait the more money you will lose. They are giving C and P exams now for IHD.

J

Thank You for replying to my post. ....I'm sorry , I forgot to put in my post ,that he did file claim for IHD in Jan. 2010. I know they will go back to then,,,but was wondering about if he would come under Nehmer ,,,back to 2005 .....HE didn't file because it wasn't on Ao list, but they referred to it when he was approved for DMII and PTSD .What do you think ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree w/jbasser but you needn't worry about monetary loss. IHD claim should go back to original claim date of 2005. I'd also file for TDIU since he can't work and an increase in the PTSD rating.

pr

Thank You for replying to my post ......We thought you had to have a 40 to 60 % rating just on one thing before you could put in for TDIU ?? WE are new on all this , so please reply. Should we send a copy of his SSDI approval letter to VARO??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should claim the IHD under the new regulations and refer them to the date of any past denied claim for heart disease (he could even enclose a copy of the older denial for heart disease.

He should ask them for a proper rating for his Agent Orange induced IHD and also remind them to apply the Nehmer Court Order to the retroactive payment and to the earliest effective date.

We have a lot of info on these new IHD claims and the Nehmer Court Order in the Agent Orange forum here at Hadit.

As I understand the application of Nehmer to these new claims-Nehmer should cover any past denied claim for IHD -for the earliest effective date.

I have similiar claim I have not filed yet.(I am AO widow)I just found (in going over years of VAOLA paperwork),that the BVA denied a IHD claim I had filed over a decade ago.And I forgot about it when they awarded under something else.

The VA sent out a Fast Letter for these IHD claims and it covered the Nehmer Court Order.

I will double check to see if it was posted in the AO forum.

Has any doctor associated his HBP with either the diabetes or the IHD? Has he inclded HBP in his IHD claim?

Welcome to hadit.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should claim the IHD under the new regulations and refer them to the date of any past denied claim for heart disease (he could even enclose a copy of the older denial for heart disease.

He should ask them for a proper rating for his Agent Orange induced IHD and also remind them to apply the Nehmer Court Order to the retroactive payment and to the earliest effective date.

We have a lot of info on these new IHD claims and the Nehmer Court Order in the Agent Orange forum here at Hadit.

As I understand the application of Nehmer to these new claims-Nehmer should cover any past denied claim for IHD -for the earliest effective date.

I have similiar claim I have not filed yet.(I am AO widow)I just found (in going over years of VAOLA paperwork),that the BVA denied a IHD claim I had filed over a decade ago.And I forgot about it when they awarded under something else.

The VA sent out a Fast Letter for these IHD claims and it covered the Nehmer Court Order.

I will double check to see if it was posted in the AO forum.

Has any doctor associated his HBP with either the diabetes or the IHD? Has he inclded HBP in his IHD claim?

Welcome to hadit.

Yes ,and they sent papers to be filled out for HBP , after he filed for IHD , but it said in there , that for it to be SC, he would have had to developed it while in service or within 1 year of discharge , to claim it because his HBP, started several years before heart attack and IHD. Also thats why we don't think they will consider IHD under Nehmer , is because he never actually filed for IHD, because it wasn't on AO list .They knew about it and the HBP , because we sent copies of all his private doctor's reports when he filed claim for DMII and PTSD.Thats when he got letter of approval for those , and in that letter is where it stated they couldn't approve his heart secondary to DMII because heart attack was before DMII.

I thank You for reply to my post,and if you can add anything else on this , I would appreaciate it...............and anyone else also............ Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use