Jump to content
  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Available Subscriptions

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Berta

Dic 1318 Changes

Question

The 38 USC 1318 regs for DIC changed quite some time ago and I was unable to find the topic here-didn't have time to read all the posts-I mentioned this in the Claims Research forum so felt best to post the info again.

This BVA case explains the change.

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp10/files1/1009251.txt

These types of DIC claims are very difficult to succeed in.

In part the decision above explains the new regs thus:

Previously, under the hypothetical entitlement approach, for

claims for DIC benefits filed before January 21, 2000, if the

survivor of a deceased Veteran could prove that a Veteran

would have been entitled to receive compensation for a 100

percent disabling service-connected disability for ten years

prior to death, then the survivor could claim DIC benefits

under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, even though the deceased Veteran

did not actually receive such compensation. Green v. Brown,

10 Vet. App. 111 (1997); Carpenter v. West, 11 Vet. App. 140

(1998); Wingo v. West, 11 Vet. App. 307 (1998); Cole v. West,

13 Vet. App. 268 (1999). However, effective January 21,

2000, the regulations were changed to preclude survivors of

Veterans from bringing claims for DIC benefits using a

hypothetical entitlement approach for claims pending as of

January 21, 2000. 38 C.F.R. § 3.22; Rodriguez v. Nicholson,

19 Vet. App. 275 (2005); 65 Fed. Reg. 3,388 (Jan. 21, 2000).

Subsequently, applying the three-part test outlined in

Princess Cruises v. United States, 397 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir.

2005), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit (Federal Circuit) held that the new version of 38

C.F.R. § 3.22, barring the use of the hypothetical

entitlement theory, does not have an impermissible

retroactive effect and may be applied to bar claims for DIC

benefits filed by survivors prior to January 21, 2000.

Rodriguez v. Peake, 511 F.3d 1147 (Fed. Cir. 2008). The

Federal Circuit found that the application of the amended

38 C.F.R. § 3.22 did not create an unlawful retroactive

effect because it did not retrospectively diminish any rights

to benefits. Notably however, the claimant in the Rodriguez

case had filed her DIC claim before the decision in Green v.

Brown, 10 Vet. App. 111 (1997) was issued (before February

1997). The decision left open the question of whether

hypothetical entitlement was available to an appellant who

filed her claim after February 1997, but prior to the

regulatory change in January 2000.

However, in response to that question, the Federal Circuit

most recently held that that the regulatory changes

eliminating the hypothetical entitlement theory of DIC, as

discussed in Rodriguez v. Peake, 511 F.3d 1147 (Fed. Cir.

2008), are retroactive even where an appellant filed her

claim after February 1997. Tarver v. Shinseki, 557 F.3d 1371

(Fed. Cir. 2009). In essence, under the holdings of

Rodriguez and Tarver, the amended regulation 38 C.F.R. § 3.22

does not have an impermissible retroactive effect, and may be

applied in order to bar DIC claims filed by survivors under

the hypothetical entitlement theory, no matter when the claim

was filed. Thus, there is no longer a theory of hypothetical

entitlement to DIC benefits.

The Veteran in this case died on August [redacted], 2007. The cause

of death was listed as cerebrovascular accident. Chronic

obstructive pulmonary disease was listed as a significant

factor contributing to his death. At the time of his death,

the Veteran was in receipt of a 100 percent disability rating

for a psychiatric condition, to include schizoaffective

disorder claimed as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and

a nervous condition, effective January 16, 2002, the date of

receipt of his claim for benefits. He had no other service-

connected disabilities. Furthermore, there is no indication

or allegation that he was a former POW. He was not in actual

receipt of compensation for a service-connected disability

rated as totally disabling by VA for any of the required

periods of time. 38 C.F.R. § 3.22(a).

In her claim for dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC)

under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, the appellant contends that the

Veteran should have been in receipt of total 100 percent

disability compensation due to service-connected psychiatric

disability for at least 10 years prior to his death in August

2007. That claim is, in essence, a claim of hypo” etc.....

***********************************************

The VA now requires that the survivor prove a CUE was committed by VA in a past denial that would have subsequently awarded DIC under the 10 year rule (with a posthumous grant of 100% P & T) but for the CUE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • SHOW YOUR SUPPORT: Ad Free Subscriptions to the Forum available
      Ad free subscriptions are available for the forum. Subscriptions give you the forums ad free and help support the forum and site. Monthly $5 Annually $50 https://community.hadit.com/subscriptions/

      Every bit helps - Thank you.

       
      • 0 replies
    • Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask
      Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask. Chris Attig - Veterans Law Blog 

      <br style="color:#000000; text-align:start">How to Hire an Attorney For Your VA Claim or Appeal Free Guidebook available on the Veterans Law Blog

      I got an email the other day from a Veteran.  It had 2 or 3 sentences about his claim, and then closed at the end: “Please call me. So-and-so told me you were the best and I want your help.”

      While I appreciate the compliments, I shudder a little at emails like this.  For 2 reasons.

      First, I get a lot of emails like this.  And while I diligently represent my clients – I often tell them we will pursue their claim until we have no more appeals or until we win – I am most assuredly not the best.

      There are a LOT of damn good VA Disability attorneys out there.  (Most, if not all, of the best are members of the National Organization of Veterans Advocates…read about one of them, here)

      Second, I don’t want Veterans to choose their attorney based on who their friend thought was the best.  I want Veterans to choose the VA Disability attorney who is BEST for their case.

      In some situations, that may be the Attig Law Firm.

      But it may also be be Hill and Ponton, or Chisholm-Kilpatrick, or Bergman Moore.  Or any one of the dozens of other attorneys who have made the representation of Veterans their professional life’s work.

      There are hundreds of attorneys that are out there representing Veterans, and I’m here to tell you that who is best for your friend’s case may not be the best for your case.

      How do you Find the Best VA Disability Attorney for your Claim?

      First, you have to answer the question: do you NEED an attorney?

      Some of you don’t...
      • 1 reply
    • VA Emergency Medical Care
      VA Emergency Medical Care
      • 3 replies
    • Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      • 0 replies
    • Thanks Berta for your help. I did receive my 100% today for my IU claim on 6/20/2018. It only took 64 days to complete and it is p&t. Thanks for your words of wisdom. 
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines