Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question For James Breckenridge About Possible Claim

Rate this question


Philip Rogers

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'm currently 100% P&T, for PTSD, for over 20 yrs. I was discharged in 1968, having served 2 consecutive years as a combat infantryman, w/the 1st Cav (65-67). In 1971 I was in a serious motorcycle accident w/multiple fracures of leg/arm and body, etc. I spent 5 days in a coma, 2yrs in and out of surgery, and have no recollection of the accident. In '73 I applied for VA assistance and was awarded NSC pension for the injuries. Through my counseling over the years, I now believe my "accident," and have for about 15 yrs, was an attempted suicide. The description in the accident report shows a high speed collision with a parked car, at a curve in the road, of which I was very familiar. It appears I accelerated directly into the car, intentionally failing to make the turn. No alcohol or drugs were involved. Now, looking back over my life and how I believe I've had PTSD since my return from VN, I would like to rectify the NSC award and have it changed to SC. The additional awards would mean SMC for me. At that time a claim for NSC was a claim for SC. I'm thinking about filing a CUE for the VA's failure to consider SC. What are your thoughts and do you feel there is any way to correct this. Thank you, I appreciate your time!!!

I feel I could get a Forensic Phyciatrist to give an positive IMO on this.

pr

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Are you S/C for PTSD? At what percentage, and from what date?

I don't think it was a clear and unmistakeable error to not consider the possibility that your accident may have actually been a suicide attempt. That's a situation where the veteran bears some responsibility for coming to us with a theory of why their condition should be service connected. Was PTSD even claimable in 1973? If not, the failure to consider that possibility SURELY is not a CUE.

Do you have PTSD now? How disabling is it?

It sounds to me that that if you are service connected for anything, it's at a pretty low percentage, and that you've been granted NSC pension for forever due to your motorcycle crash. NSC pension isn't a lot of money, and it's even offset dollar for dollar by social security. S/C comp is almost always going to be the greater benefit, but youknow that.

You mention the need for SMC. Were you aware that you can also get increased benefits for being housebound or in need of aid and attendance, as part of your NSC pension? We call it "Special Monthly Pension." If your non service connected conditions render you so disabled that you need the aid and attendance of another person, we award Special Monthly Pension to help pay for it. I'll look up the rates when I get to work today.

If you ARE s/c for PTSD, especially at a high level, you can certainly try to get a forensic psychologist to study all the evidence surrounding your accident (police reports, witness statements, medical records) and if they're willing, in their professional capacity, to say that it's at least as likely as not that this was a suicide attempt that was part of your PTSD, then you might have a shot at getting your other injuries service connected, but it's going to be a stretch, and defenitiely won't have an effective date earlier than your date of claim even if it DOES get awarded.

Edited by JamesBreckenridge

*/ The comments and opinions expressed above are solely those of the commenter in their personal capacity and do not in any way represent the Department of Veterans Affairs. */

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you were in a Coma for 5 Days Flip, do you bave any residuals. If so you may be able to focus on a TBI claim.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, as stated in my original post, I'm 100%, SC/P&T, over 20yrs (1989), for PTSD, plus 100% NSC for pension from '71 or '73. Herein lie my problems. PTSD wasn't accepted until, I believe, 1980. Before that it would've been some kind of compensable psychosis. Also, I didn't know there was anything wrong with me, then, altho I do believe the DoD and the VA knew something was wrong w/many VN vets. So I couldn't point the VA in the right direction. I'm not trying to collect lost pay, just trying to get the NSC to be corrected to SC, which would put me at over 100+60, allowing for SMC. I don't think it fits CUE but thought I could maybe get them to accept it that way. Thanks, again!!!

pr

Are you S/C for PTSD? At what percentage, and from what date?

I don't think it was a clear and unmistakeable error to not consider the possibility that your accident may have actually been a suicide attempt. That's a situation where the veteran bears some responsibility for coming to us with a theory of why their condition should be service connected. Was PTSD even claimable in 1973? If not, the failure to consider that possibility SURELY is not a CUE.

Do you have PTSD now? How disabling is it?

It sounds to me that that if you are service connected for anything, it's at a pretty low percentage, and that you've been granted NSC pension for forever due to your motorcycle crash. NSC pension isn't a lot of money, and it's even offset dollar for dollar by social security. S/C comp is almost always going to be the greater benefit, but youknow that.

You mention the need for SMC. Were you aware that you can also get increased benefits for being housebound or in need of aid and attendance, as part of your NSC pension? We call it "Special Monthly Pension." If your non service connected conditions render you so disabled that you need the aid and attendance of another person, we award Special Monthly Pension to help pay for it. I'll look up the rates when I get to work today.

If you ARE s/c for PTSD, especially at a high level, you can certainly try to get a forensic psychologist to study all the evidence surrounding your accident (police reports, witness statements, medical records) and if they're willing, in their professional capacity, to say that it's at least as likely as not that this was a suicide attempt that was part of your PTSD, then you might have a shot at getting your other injuries service connected, but it's going to be a stretch, and defenitiely won't have an effective date earlier than your date of claim even if it DOES get awarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Sorry, no TBI, just physical ailments, altho these days I do have more wisdom but I think that's age related! ;-)

pr

If you were in a Coma for 5 Days Flip, do you bave any residuals. If so you may be able to focus on a TBI claim.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

PR, Did your original award of SC date the onset of your PTSD? Did the VA recognize your symptoms as "chronic" since military discharge? Was your original diagnosis of PTSD: chronic, acute, delayed? If Chronic, I would think that claiming injuries as secondary to PTSD would be a slam dunk ;-) IMHO. ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use