Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
emptyshell

Nod Filed But They Ignored It

Question

I had a remand declared back to 1994 by the Washington DC Board of Appeals in 2004. My Regional Office finally got my C&P exams done. One in 2008 and the the other in 2009. I received a statement of the case in Oct 2008.

I appealed that decision due to R.O. not precisely following the orders sent out in the remand decision. Remand specifically stated that I am to be examined by a Orthopedist and Neurologist.

My C&P exams were done at the VA Hospital by a General Physician and an ARNP. I went to a medical V.A. Dr. for my C&P initially. Then just after having Prostate surgery, I was called in for a second C&P exam by a ARNP. who said they needed additional testing.

In my statement of the case, they gave greater weight to the findings of ARNP over the medical Drs. findings. After reading the statement of the case I found the ARNP stated I performed physical movements that I was not requested of me and due to my earlier surgery, was incapable of performing these stated movements. I do not know if the ARNP had realized I just recently went through surgery and was still trying to heal up. So the jist the ARNP stated I functioned better than what the original C&P Dr. had stated. I appealed with a letter of disaggreement to the R.O. for not following the BOVA's remand and that the second C&P followup by the ARNP fabricated said movements that I never perfromed or could have performed. In 2009 I was finally scheduled to have my C&P exam for PTSD. My C&P results came back as favorable for my claim. After reviewing my new statement of the case in which I recieved in May of this year, I realized they oveturned the examers findings from a PTSD to a "mood disorder" Now I did not agree and went to my local V.A. Rep and filed a DeNOVO. I followed procedure as instructed and filed a form 4138. I also had my local Rep sent additional evidense regarding my PTSD. A letter was written by by Local VA Rep and dated. Sent to my R.O. Now my understanding was that they could not send their statement of the case to Washington Board of Appeals due to my DeNOVO in place. I wanted them to rexamine the evidence and redo a new statement of the case supporting my claim

Last week I received a letter from the Washington BOVA saying they are now going to make every effort to decide my appeal as quickly as possible . How can the R.O. get away with sending their Statement of the case to BOVA when I DE Novo their statement of the case. Did they send all my evidence to BOVA in DC and how do I know if they did? And was this a blatant disregard to my rights. What at this point can I do? This is based on a remand that goes back to 1994. If the Washington Board of Appeals just goes by that statement of the case that the R.O. put together they could just agree with them and approve what little they gave me on a mood disorder and that will end my remand back to 1994 and I will have to start over. I still have issues and evidence that supports my claim and are they even going to look at it and did my R.O. even send that along with their case. I know this is confusing...I just want to make it known to the Washington DC Board of Appeals that I sent a Denovo to my R.O and told them I wanted a new statement of the case. My R.O. is still trying to screw with me. It is because of all their blatant disregard to my case that is got remanded back to 1994. They said I did not go to C&P appoints that was scheduled and I proved later I had gone to all my C&P exams. Funny all those exams come up missing even though the clinic they sent me to showed me they were sent to the R.O.

They sent them more than once to them. How do you lose those. Why can't the clinic give me copies of the exams(I was told by the clinic that since V.A ordered them I could only wait till they got to my c-file)

What are my options at this point. should I be glad that they are no longer here in my R.O.? Will the Washington BOVA see what my R.O. is doing? I am so distressed by having to deal with an agncy that is supposed to help you. HELP ME!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines