SLEDGE Posted June 2, 2006 Share Posted June 2, 2006 The BVA has increased my Fibromyalgia to 20 percent and service connected Briquet's Syndrome without setting a percentage of disability. An earlier effective date for TDIU was denied again. This 32 page document is full of wrong legal standards and medical decisions made by the raters. They missed (ignored) most of the favorable evidence toward a higher rating for PTSD and the earlier effective date for TDIU. It's also full of contridictions and doubletalk. They acknowledge their adjudication mistakes and then explain why those mistakes are (harmless?) We had challenged their last examination, only of the records, and they explain why that challenge is invalid as a result of this 32 page document. I thought Hitler was dead! sledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Pete53 Posted June 2, 2006 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted June 2, 2006 At least you have a good lawyer. Good Luck you must have really pissed them off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EODMOMMY Posted June 2, 2006 Share Posted June 2, 2006 Dear sir. I got last week a BVA ruling with the same quality mistakes in it. Im on my way to the court. I wont waste any more time with there incomeptant by choice review of my claim. Its not Hitler reviewing our claims. Its Mr Magoo. Terry Higgins :) I think you would do better with Mr. Magoo, he had better eyesight then the people who do the claims reviews at the VA! B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
SLEDGE
The BVA has increased my Fibromyalgia to 20 percent and service connected Briquet's Syndrome without setting a percentage of disability.
An earlier effective date for TDIU was denied again.
This 32 page document is full of wrong legal standards and medical decisions made by the raters.
They missed (ignored) most of the favorable evidence toward a higher rating for PTSD and the earlier effective date for TDIU.
It's also full of contridictions and doubletalk.
They acknowledge their adjudication mistakes and then explain why those mistakes are (harmless?)
We had challenged their last examination, only of the records, and they explain why that challenge is invalid as a result of this 32 page document.
I thought Hitler was dead!
sledge
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
1
Popular Days
Jun 2
3
Top Posters For This Question
Pete53 1 post
SLEDGE 1 post
EODMOMMY 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 2 2006
3 posts
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts