Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sign in to follow this  

Smc Housebound Examination

Recommended Posts

Hi all:

You may know from previous posts that I am TDIU T&P since 2002 for PTSD.

I am a VietNam vet who served during the Easter Offensive of 1972.

When I found out about Bradley v Peake, I filed for Housebound benefits because I am substantially self-restricted to my home.

(Bradley v Peake) allows TDIU vets to be granted SMC Housebound benefits.

Anyway, my question is: What is this VA C&P Psych gonna ask me?

Is Housebound for PTSD not for real?

I mean, their are many other vets in much much worse shape (physically) than me who are truly Housebound.

I feel guilty about even filing for Housebound 'cause I know it is all in my head.

Anyway, I have struggled for years with these agoraphobic symptoms and they are documented for 11 years at my VA Outpatient Clinic.

My point is that I am falling to pieces at the thought of having to discuss my pain with a stranger. I also have to travel 50 miles to this C&P. I don't know if I can go through with this exam.

It would ease my nervousness if i had some idea what he/she is gonna ask me.


Mike S

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This past discussion here at hadit might help you quite a bit:

Also re: Bradley V Peake -the 2010 edition of the VBM (NVLSP) makes this point:

"the effective date of payment for Special Monthly Compensation is not when the issue was specifically raised by the evidence ,but when the evidence first suggested as need for the benefit."

Bradley is a long confusing read.When I get a chance to re=read it maybe I can understand this statement by NVLSP better.

It seems to me they are saying... say a vet is diagnosed and rated with PTSD as TDIU or totally disabling -with agoraphobia as consequence of the PTSD in the Axis stuff.

Say the vet gets the PTSD decision in Sept 2009 and the decision grants the total comp award but fails to consider or infer SMC.

Say the vet NODS this under Bradley asking for SMC "S" as well as an EED back to date of the claim OR-better yet- to when the initial agoraphobia diagnosis was made.

The date the evidence first suggested "need" fo SMC could be a very favorable date that seems here not to be regarding the date the claim was filed. ??

Any comments on that?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My question is if a vet is TDIU for one disability and has over 60% for other disabilites then what kind of claim does he make for SMC housebound? He should not have to have a C&P exam because this is a statutory benefit according to Bradley v Peake. The VA should infer housebound SMC for me without me having to go through claims process. Do I just request Housebound and remind them of Bradley v Peake. If I know the St. Petersburg VARO I will get a denial in a hurry or they will fit me up for a C&P exam. I am not going for any more mental C&P exams.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the SMC exam about 3 years ago. The examiner was quite thorough asked a lot of questions mostly dealing with what my days were like. How much I was able to do and how I was able to get out. He made me walk up and down the hallway. All in all spent over 45 minutes with him and 6 weeks later I got SMC but not with Bradley v Peake decision but effective date of when I filed which most of the time is ok with me.

Since I was awarded 100% P&T with a diagnosis of Acrophobia I may ask for a CUE back to 1993 and possibly 1991 when I originally filed my claim

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Aid & Attendance, but only because I filed an appeal after getting housebound. I did not have a C/P exam because my VA PCP completed the examination worksheet, and wrote a letter say I need it prior to me filing my claim.

Now I am rated 100% plus 60% so I get A&A at the L 1/2 rate.. but

I also have a cue claim in for Housebound that was not awarded but should have been awarded when I received TDIU for my back injury and later received a 60% raring fo rmy lungs... I claimed this under Bradley V Peake , va hasn't

even acknowledged the claim.. so it will be interesting what will happen.. IF It is awarded and it should be , that is about $19K that will be back pay....

Edited by Teac

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.


      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.


      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.








      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.


      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.

      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.

      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law

      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual

      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures

      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation

      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.


      The report is here:


      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.



      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines