Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
rotorhead

No C%p Exam

Question

I have been reading over the denial for I U that I received last week. The bottom line for the denial was that I am only rated at 60%.

DMII 20#

PN RU 10% UL 10% LL 10% LR 10%

Macular Degeneration 10%

TOTAL 60%

The denial states that I reported for a examination, I DID NOT have a C&P for IU. CUE?

or give it up until I am rated 70%. I am a 3 mets or less IHD claim pending back to Jan 06.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

You should be getting an award letter soon for your IHD. Stay on top of that and hold off on appealing the IU. You may get the numbers you need from the IU + you should see a real good retro if you had claimed before and been denied.

If you appeal the IU it now it may slow down everything!

Good Luck on your claim!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been reading over the denial for I U that I received last week. The bottom line for the denial was that I am only rated at 60%.

DMII 20#

PN RU 10% UL 10% LL 10% LR 10%

Macular Degeneration 10%

TOTAL 60%

The denial states that I reported for a examination, I DID NOT have a C&P for IU. CUE?

or give it up until I am rated 70%. I am a 3 mets or less IHD claim pending back to Jan 06.

Dave

rotor,

I do not believe nor have I ever seen a specific exam for IU that exists.

Your options that I know of is to request 4.16 (b) or get some increase that would total the 70 percent for IU.

JMHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Individual unelployability if often misconcieved as being a rateable disability. it is not. A C and P exam would be performed on your medical conditions to see of you qualify for IU which is a benefit afforded to those whose service connected disabilities are severe enough to prevent them from working.

There is no exam for IU. just an exam of service connected conditions. This is why we see so many requests for reduction as the Examiner feels conditions are improved. Sometimes IU can backfire on a Vet.

J

Edited by jbasser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sure sounds like a potential "CUE" and "NOD" to me!

If no statement was made regarding IHD, you will need to at least file an NOD to protect your claim origination date before any expiration date that exists.

There is a serious question that arises if the VA claims you reported for a C%P that never happened. I'd ask immediately for a copy of the C&P.

It may be that the VA did a C&P paper record review instead of an actual exam, (they can do this), and the RO didn't notice the difference. (nothing new)

If the written evidence is good enough, this is certainly less hassle than going through an exam.

As I understand it "deemed denied" is likely the current rule for the unmentioned conditions, and might be stretched to include IHD if there isn't a "deferred" statement in the decision.

They rated the PN differently than the VARO I deal with recently did. It looks like they rated the upper and lower part of each leg in your decision separately.

The Atlanta VARO rated each leg (total) at 10% plus "Bi-Lateral" in a recent PN decision that I'm referring to.

Actually, if you are at 3 Mets or less, along with the other problems, you should be automatically considered for TDIU. The VA often fails to do this.

I have been reading over the denial for I U that I received last week. The bottom line for the denial was that I am only rated at 60%.

DMII 20#

PN RU 10% UL 10% LL 10% LR 10%

Macular Degeneration 10%

TOTAL 60%

The denial states that I reported for a examination, I DID NOT have a C&P for IU. CUE?

or give it up until I am rated 70%. I am a 3 mets or less IHD claim pending back to Jan 06.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only file a CUE on a final decision. If you can still use regular appeal system then use it. File your NOD and note the fact you did not have a C&P exam. CUE is your last resort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines