on remand i had a c&p exam to find any inconsistencies of any findings,diagnoses or opinions.and explain or reconcile.she said the only inconsistency was a statement from my treating doctor,who is the va chief of neurology.at my vamc, just because he said my active duty back injury "may have"contributed to my curren low back disability. i guess the words " may have " is not clear enough or not the law, but should a nurse practioner make a decision that points toward reasonable doubt,or the credibility of other opinions in my claim.
oh this exam is 9 pages and it has a part that says was a standard exam requestd, and then a part that says non-standard exam,i dont understand that,so help please thanks
Question
mos1833
on remand i had a c&p exam to find any inconsistencies of any findings,diagnoses or opinions.and explain or reconcile.she said the only inconsistency was a statement from my treating doctor,who is the va chief of neurology.at my vamc, just because he said my active duty back injury "may have"contributed to my curren low back disability. i guess the words " may have " is not clear enough or not the law, but should a nurse practioner make a decision that points toward reasonable doubt,or the credibility of other opinions in my claim.
oh this exam is 9 pages and it has a part that says was a standard exam requestd, and then a part that says non-standard exam,i dont understand that,so help please thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Oct 21
1
Top Posters For This Question
mos1833 1 post
Popular Days
Oct 21 2010
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now