Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
yulooking

Need To Vent Again

Question

i have posted here about my cue claim. did the cue of a 1994 rating. it got to bva july 31 they say my claim has been a pending in appeal status since 1994 so there can not be a cue of a pending claim. and found and informal iu claim from 1994. wow i thought

2001 i was granted iu and 60% for same issue as 1994. wow my effective dated should be 1994. no

bva turn around and remaned my iu claim as if it was never granted 2001. granted me 10% from 1994-2001 for the issue.

never told why my effective dated are not 1994. did the reconsideration still not told why my effective dated are not 1994. what i got was appeal to the court.

talk to lawyer they tell me i have not thing to appeal to the courts the bva granted my claims and remaned the other. when the bva made this decision my claim were final by the dro decision 2001. they are aware of this that why 1994-2001.

i have appeal to court and talk to a few lawyer who see it. but now that i had to appeal to court it has stop them from working this iu claim that was remaned for a specail medical opion. which is to add more time.

this is a example how they play with claim they mess up on.

does anyone have contact numbers for the office of general consoul was told my folder is there now.

oh yeah i have no vso she withdraw the day of my dro hearing on the cue. she worked the 2001 claim and did not want me to do the cue. the crazy thing is how didnt they no my claim were still pending in 2001.

and i have no vso because once it become a appeal vso are hard to get that why they have rules vso have to do to withdraw and i believe mines did not follow them. just helps with the appeal to the court. and now i have no one to talk to about this try osbudman nothing call the bva they have done nothing so i am left with the courts this is like a ingram v nicholson pending claims. i am on top of it. and advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

"oes anyone have contact numbers for the office of general consoul was told my folder is there now."

1-202-273-6660 main OGC number

1-202-273-6385 (Fax)

These were working numbers as of a few months ago when I had to get them to pay me back my FTCA offset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines