Jump to content

Sponsored Ads



  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • 0
Chuck75

Co Pay And A.o. Presumptives

Question

I ran into an interesting and frustrating situation that I and not a few other veterans seem to be in!

The VA has placed documents on it's web site(s) that indicate that an A.O. presumptive veteran is not charged Co-Pay for treatment (includes drugs)

of various problems that are related to A.O. exposure.

The first document is titled:

"VA Health Care Eligibility & Enrollment"

"Outpatient Prescription Copay"

And states:

"Exceptions to Copay Rules for Medication"

"VA does not charge a copay for medications used for treatment of --"

-

-

-

"A veteran's conditions related to a veteran's exposure to:"

"Herbicides during the Vietnam-era"

-

And so forth

The document also contains a statement relating to reduction of co-pay and to contact

the "Enrollment Coordinator at your local VAMC" or for further information call the VA at 1-877-222-8387

(Who profess to no knowledge and/or expound the co-pay until "adjudicated" VA stand)

Now, moving on to the next VA document ---

Fact Sheet 164-8

2010 Copay Requirements at a Glance

Dated July 2010

This document lists the one through eight "Priority Groups" that the VA places Veterans into, and lists Co-Pay requirements in a table corresponding to each group.

Three groups of the eight are involved.

"Group 2 & 3 (Service connection 10-30%) No medication co-pay for SC condition or ex POW"

(This applies to all conditions that have been "adjudicated" as being service connected. )

The real heart of the matter.

"Group 6 Combat Veteran SHAD, SC 0% - - - Agent Orange Exposure ---- Copay rules apply if unrelated to group 6 placement". Since "adjudicated" conditions fall under group 2 & 3, this can only apply to un"adjucated" or 0% conditions.

Evidently, the VA interprets a veteran's change to Group 2 or 3 from another Group, due to one or more "adjucated" condition(s) as removing the veteran from Group 6 entirely, thus making any un"adjudicated" conditions covered by Group 6 subject to co-pay.

THE VA IS CHARGING COPAY for Group 6 conditions, AND REFUSING TO STOP UNTIL A.O. PRESUMPTIVE CONDITIONS ARE "ADJUCATED", at which time a veteran changes from Group 6 to Group 2 or 3.

Web Reference

www.va.gov/healtheligibility/Library/pubs/CopayGlance

A second web reference

http://www4.va.gov/h...iptionCopay.asp

Further, The VA Finance, VAMC Business Office, VARO, the 1000 number, etc. take the same stance about "adjudication"

In other words, The VA is saying one thing in WRITING, and doing something different in actual fact! (What else is new!)

The VA is also ignoring the difference between an A.O. related presumptive condition and a directly connected (by adjudication or law) condition.

The key difference is that a presumptive condition is, by law and regulation, to be treated as a service connected condition, unless the VA can, under strict limitations, prove otherwise. (Adjudication)

Since the amounts per drug are "only" eight dollars, those in "high places" don't seem to be concerned, or even willing to look at the matter. (For that matter, they are almost unreachable by the average veteran.)

But, when you consider multiple thousands of veterans waiting to have A. O. & SHAD claims "adjucated", and take multiple prescription drugs for their conditions, The money involved is considerable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Ad

I agree with Chuck. If you are in a group listed as a special group then there should be no co pays. They should placed into category 6 until their claims are resolved.

whopayscopaysjan09.pdf

Edited by jbasser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More than one version of "who pays" exists

The two documents I referred to are attached, along with an Iris web site page.

It's not only a "special group" It has to do with the definition of a "presumptive condition", and the legal status of presumptive conditions.

(They are "assumed" to be service connected, unless and until proven otherwise.)

I agree with Chuck. If you are in a group listed as a special group then there should be no co pays. They should placed into category 6 until their claims are resolved.

post-1139-063947900 1289079569_thumb.jpg

post-1139-045934700 1289079605_thumb.jpg

iriscopay.txt

Edited by Chuck75

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is that the VA is collecting "Co-pay" improperly from thousands of A.O. and SHAD veterans.

It's true that the veterans MAY eventually recover (without interest) the co pay amounts, possibly up to years later.

With such things as IHD and other similar conditions five or more drugs can be involved. If a veteran has s combination of IHD and DMII, along with other problems, more drugs are involved.

Why should the veteran have to request a refund. It should be automatic on award or classification of a condition as presumptive. Nehmer can also be involved.

I'm missing your point. I agree that until it's adjudicated the claimant must pay. Once SC'd they can request a refund.

pr

Edited by Chuck75

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess you folks are not understanding me or the VA system. Prior to finding SC the VA needs to decide if you are 1.) a veteran? 2.) Wartime service? 3.) Honorable service? 4.) Necessary length of service?? 5.) etc?? This must all be done prior to deciding whether you fall under the "presumption." Just because you know you are doesn't cut it. There is a process that must be followed. jmo And yes, you should have to request the refund but that's another issue.

pr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
        • Haha
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:

      https://www.stripes.com/news/lawmakers-launch-new-effort-to-provide-agent-orange-coverage-for-blue-water-navy-vets-1.525395

      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.

       

       
      • 10 replies
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines