Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
EODMOMMY

Bva--how Long On Average For A Decision?

Question

I finally got my husband to call the VA to find out the status of his appeal. The lady was shocked, because it is listed as with the Decision Officer and it has been for two years! She didn't want to have it pulled, because you know what happens then, you go down to the bottom of the pile. But she made a note (at least she said she did) in the computer about it.

On average, how long does it take for the BVA to come down with a decision? I finally got a copy of a letter from our primary doctor saying that my husband's condition is chronic and it started while he was on active duty. It was faxed to our State VA Rep. who is suppose to represent us and send this info to Atlanta, but I am not impressed with this guy, he is the second one we have had, neither one ever communicated with us. But I have no idea if they BVA ever received the letter. Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

We waited approximately two years from the written request for a Board hearing and the time it actually reached the Board. We waited approximately a month after the Board met before we received the decision in writing. My husband and I do not use a VSO, we do everything ourselves. We started handling things on our own due to circumstances that resemble those you describe.

My opinion is that you should trust your gut feeling about your VSO. At the very least, keep him in the picture for advice if you think what he says has any value, but go ahead and mail your claims documentation via certified mail on your own. You can copy him, but take care of the legwork yourself. You'll know for sure it was done, and you'll have a receipt of delivery.

No one is going to care about or pay as much attention to your claims as you will.

My opinion is that you should send EVERYTHING straight to the VA (and copy your VSO if you want to). If you have new evidence to support your claim, send it in yourself.

I'm a little confused. Did you file your formal request for a Board hearing through your VSO only to discover he didn't send it in? Is your stuff still at the VARO with a DRO for the last two years? Sorry, I'm not clear. If your stuff is at the VARO, send the additional evidence to the VARO. If your stuff is at the Board, send it to the Board and copy your VSO and the VARO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think two years is a good guess. Terry higgins say sooner. I always waited at least two years for an answer from the BVA. I usually got a remand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?"

I sure would- I send my vet rep copies but do the actual VARO mailing myself-everything I send goes Priority ot at least with a Proof of Mailing certificate.

I popped into the BVA browser for 2006 the word Remand and 7478 of 9530 appeals came up-

This doesnt mean that they were all remanded recently , but at some point many were remanded in the past-The VCAA ,while giving veterans more chances to succeed- if they get a good VCAA letter telling them what they need-has caused many of these remands because the VA in some cases,probably never sent them one.

I have never gotten a VCAA letter at all-my claims have been at the VARo for over three years.

I read somewhere that a well substantiated claim might not generate a VCAA letter-if they have enough evidence.

I accessed 3 random 2006 decisions that were not remands to get an idea of how long they took-

One appeal from a claim filed in Feb 2002 was denied in April 2006 as the BVA said a NOD had not been filed in a timely manner.

Another was a severance on appeal from a Dec 2002 rating decision that severed comp for HBP, heart disease and atherosclerosis.

The March 2006 BVA decision restored the comp.

The third claim involved a vet who had, since 1988, had filed VA claims with success yet he question the EEDs- he did win an award of much earlier effective date on his PTSD claim.

His additional claims had been remanded by BVA in 2001 and then again in 2004, and then in 2006.

I found claims that were appealed and got BVA decisions in about a year in 2000,2001, 2002 but the VCAA seems to have changed all that.

This 2006 Remand shows you just what I mean:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files1/0601194.txt

It sure ticks me off to see that the veteran was not properly advised under the VCAA- thus this remand was in order.

The BVA is doing the right thing here- but I sure hope this vet can wait it all out.

Has anyone here ever gotten a VCAA letter?

That letter should be specific as to what they need to send to support and prove their claim.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?"

I sure would- I send my vet rep copies but do the actual VARO mailing myself-everything I send goes Priority ot at least with a Proof of Mailing certificate.

I have never gotten a VCAA letter at all-my claims have been at the VARo for over three years.

I read somewhere that a well substantiated claim might not generate a VCAA letter-if they have enough evidence.

It sure ticks me off to see that the veteran was not properly advised under the VCAA- thus this remand was in order.

The BVA is doing the right thing here- but I sure hope this vet can wait it all out.

Has anyone here ever gotten a VCAA letter?

That letter should be specific as to what they need to send to support and prove their claim.

I am going to send the additonal information to the VA Regional Office in Atlanta (where my husband's case is), I always send it certfied mail with a return receipt. Things of this nature, I don't trust them.

The lady that my husband spoke to said they received the VA Form 9. I am the one who did all the filling out of the form and typing up my disagreements to their decisions from our NOD decision. The only reason my husband went to State Veteran's Rep, because he could fax the stuff to Atlanta, we where near the 60 day deadline. But the VA did receive it.

On the VCAA letter, the only time we got any letters was in the beginning. Most where about they where behind on cases and they hadn't forgoten about us!! :) We did get one wanting more infor on the ionizing radiation, but all I could tell them was we didn't have the information, they would have to contact the Public Health Clinic at each base my husband was at and contact Sandia National Labratories. Since then, nothing!! Except to tell us he got a 20% rating and then on our NOD that we where denied. They gave him 10% for his knee and 10% for his shoulder. Actually he should have gotten more for his shoulder, since the orthopedic he saw while on activy duty wanted to do surgery on it again, but she was PCSing and then we where out (medically retired). But my main concern after he was retired was his heart.

The information I have is a letter from our primary doctor who looked over a copy of my husband's military medical records (even though he knew the case, because he was my doctor for most of the years we where stationed here on active duty). It isn't in Nexus format, are they pickey about that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"It isn't in Nexus format, are they pickey about that?"

I feel the Nexus factor is the most important factor of most claims.

If the claim is for a secondary condition to one already established as service connected the doc should state that it is as likely as not- or more than likely (better) that the disability is secondary to the SC one and then state his/her medical rationale for this.(the nexus)

If he needs a nexus to service, the doctor would have to state the specific info in the veteran's SMRs (and then refer them to the info and date of it)that would indicate that the present disability is as likely as not or more than likely due to his service. (Unless a presumptive condition)

I had a vet who had a drusen in service, His claim was for SC of diabetes (Not Vietnam vet)

The drusen was in the first statement that the BVA made on a remand but still no one picked up on how important this word was.

I looked it up, went over the veteran's SMRs and found that this was most likely the first manifestation of inservice diabetes and the SMRs also contained additional symptoms to support this.The veteran was not diagnosed until many years after service with diabetes.

A drusen is most always a visual problem, a "hard exudate" as the older version of the VA DMII training letter calls it-we sent the VA DMII training letter with the drusen info-to the VA

They VA had already knocked down an expert IMO because the doctor had failed to make this service connection strong but with the newer info on the SMRs and this symptom, the vet- after 12 long years succeeded in getting SC.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines