Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
EODMOMMY

Bva--how Long On Average For A Decision?

Question

I finally got my husband to call the VA to find out the status of his appeal. The lady was shocked, because it is listed as with the Decision Officer and it has been for two years! She didn't want to have it pulled, because you know what happens then, you go down to the bottom of the pile. But she made a note (at least she said she did) in the computer about it.

On average, how long does it take for the BVA to come down with a decision? I finally got a copy of a letter from our primary doctor saying that my husband's condition is chronic and it started while he was on active duty. It was faxed to our State VA Rep. who is suppose to represent us and send this info to Atlanta, but I am not impressed with this guy, he is the second one we have had, neither one ever communicated with us. But I have no idea if they BVA ever received the letter. Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

We waited approximately two years from the written request for a Board hearing and the time it actually reached the Board. We waited approximately a month after the Board met before we received the decision in writing. My husband and I do not use a VSO, we do everything ourselves. We started handling things on our own due to circumstances that resemble those you describe.

My opinion is that you should trust your gut feeling about your VSO. At the very least, keep him in the picture for advice if you think what he says has any value, but go ahead and mail your claims documentation via certified mail on your own. You can copy him, but take care of the legwork yourself. You'll know for sure it was done, and you'll have a receipt of delivery.

No one is going to care about or pay as much attention to your claims as you will.

My opinion is that you should send EVERYTHING straight to the VA (and copy your VSO if you want to). If you have new evidence to support your claim, send it in yourself.

I'm a little confused. Did you file your formal request for a Board hearing through your VSO only to discover he didn't send it in? Is your stuff still at the VARO with a DRO for the last two years? Sorry, I'm not clear. If your stuff is at the VARO, send the additional evidence to the VARO. If your stuff is at the Board, send it to the Board and copy your VSO and the VARO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think two years is a good guess. Terry higgins say sooner. I always waited at least two years for an answer from the BVA. I usually got a remand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?"

I sure would- I send my vet rep copies but do the actual VARO mailing myself-everything I send goes Priority ot at least with a Proof of Mailing certificate.

I popped into the BVA browser for 2006 the word Remand and 7478 of 9530 appeals came up-

This doesnt mean that they were all remanded recently , but at some point many were remanded in the past-The VCAA ,while giving veterans more chances to succeed- if they get a good VCAA letter telling them what they need-has caused many of these remands because the VA in some cases,probably never sent them one.

I have never gotten a VCAA letter at all-my claims have been at the VARo for over three years.

I read somewhere that a well substantiated claim might not generate a VCAA letter-if they have enough evidence.

I accessed 3 random 2006 decisions that were not remands to get an idea of how long they took-

One appeal from a claim filed in Feb 2002 was denied in April 2006 as the BVA said a NOD had not been filed in a timely manner.

Another was a severance on appeal from a Dec 2002 rating decision that severed comp for HBP, heart disease and atherosclerosis.

The March 2006 BVA decision restored the comp.

The third claim involved a vet who had, since 1988, had filed VA claims with success yet he question the EEDs- he did win an award of much earlier effective date on his PTSD claim.

His additional claims had been remanded by BVA in 2001 and then again in 2004, and then in 2006.

I found claims that were appealed and got BVA decisions in about a year in 2000,2001, 2002 but the VCAA seems to have changed all that.

This 2006 Remand shows you just what I mean:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files1/0601194.txt

It sure ticks me off to see that the veteran was not properly advised under the VCAA- thus this remand was in order.

The BVA is doing the right thing here- but I sure hope this vet can wait it all out.

Has anyone here ever gotten a VCAA letter?

That letter should be specific as to what they need to send to support and prove their claim.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?"

I sure would- I send my vet rep copies but do the actual VARO mailing myself-everything I send goes Priority ot at least with a Proof of Mailing certificate.

I have never gotten a VCAA letter at all-my claims have been at the VARo for over three years.

I read somewhere that a well substantiated claim might not generate a VCAA letter-if they have enough evidence.

It sure ticks me off to see that the veteran was not properly advised under the VCAA- thus this remand was in order.

The BVA is doing the right thing here- but I sure hope this vet can wait it all out.

Has anyone here ever gotten a VCAA letter?

That letter should be specific as to what they need to send to support and prove their claim.

I am going to send the additonal information to the VA Regional Office in Atlanta (where my husband's case is), I always send it certfied mail with a return receipt. Things of this nature, I don't trust them.

The lady that my husband spoke to said they received the VA Form 9. I am the one who did all the filling out of the form and typing up my disagreements to their decisions from our NOD decision. The only reason my husband went to State Veteran's Rep, because he could fax the stuff to Atlanta, we where near the 60 day deadline. But the VA did receive it.

On the VCAA letter, the only time we got any letters was in the beginning. Most where about they where behind on cases and they hadn't forgoten about us!! :) We did get one wanting more infor on the ionizing radiation, but all I could tell them was we didn't have the information, they would have to contact the Public Health Clinic at each base my husband was at and contact Sandia National Labratories. Since then, nothing!! Except to tell us he got a 20% rating and then on our NOD that we where denied. They gave him 10% for his knee and 10% for his shoulder. Actually he should have gotten more for his shoulder, since the orthopedic he saw while on activy duty wanted to do surgery on it again, but she was PCSing and then we where out (medically retired). But my main concern after he was retired was his heart.

The information I have is a letter from our primary doctor who looked over a copy of my husband's military medical records (even though he knew the case, because he was my doctor for most of the years we where stationed here on active duty). It isn't in Nexus format, are they pickey about that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"It isn't in Nexus format, are they pickey about that?"

I feel the Nexus factor is the most important factor of most claims.

If the claim is for a secondary condition to one already established as service connected the doc should state that it is as likely as not- or more than likely (better) that the disability is secondary to the SC one and then state his/her medical rationale for this.(the nexus)

If he needs a nexus to service, the doctor would have to state the specific info in the veteran's SMRs (and then refer them to the info and date of it)that would indicate that the present disability is as likely as not or more than likely due to his service. (Unless a presumptive condition)

I had a vet who had a drusen in service, His claim was for SC of diabetes (Not Vietnam vet)

The drusen was in the first statement that the BVA made on a remand but still no one picked up on how important this word was.

I looked it up, went over the veteran's SMRs and found that this was most likely the first manifestation of inservice diabetes and the SMRs also contained additional symptoms to support this.The veteran was not diagnosed until many years after service with diabetes.

A drusen is most always a visual problem, a "hard exudate" as the older version of the VA DMII training letter calls it-we sent the VA DMII training letter with the drusen info-to the VA

They VA had already knocked down an expert IMO because the doctor had failed to make this service connection strong but with the newer info on the SMRs and this symptom, the vet- after 12 long years succeeded in getting SC.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 6 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:


      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis


      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.


      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 

       

      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.

       

      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines