Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
EODMOMMY

Bva--how Long On Average For A Decision?

Question

I finally got my husband to call the VA to find out the status of his appeal. The lady was shocked, because it is listed as with the Decision Officer and it has been for two years! She didn't want to have it pulled, because you know what happens then, you go down to the bottom of the pile. But she made a note (at least she said she did) in the computer about it.

On average, how long does it take for the BVA to come down with a decision? I finally got a copy of a letter from our primary doctor saying that my husband's condition is chronic and it started while he was on active duty. It was faxed to our State VA Rep. who is suppose to represent us and send this info to Atlanta, but I am not impressed with this guy, he is the second one we have had, neither one ever communicated with us. But I have no idea if they BVA ever received the letter. Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

I was looking for a sample Nexus letter on the web and came across this one testimony to the House Committe for Veteran Affairs. Boy what he talks about sounds real familiar, it is almost like a yo-yo effect. The BVA will remand something down and ask specific questions, the vet gets sent for another exam and a VAMC and the doctor still doesn't answer the questions and it can go on this way for several times. Back and forth. This is from 2000, so I don't know if it is still current on how the VA works.

Witness Testimony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"It isn't in Nexus format, are they pickey about that?"

I feel the Nexus factor is the most important factor of most claims.

I was just looking at the letter and I need a better letter. He doesn't mention that his symptoms go back to while he was in the service. So they could deny SC, even though they know this has been going on since he was on active duty.

Problem is, most civilian doctors won't put themselves out on a limb to override or support another doctor's oppinion. I worked for doctor's too long, seen it happen.

The one person I need to get off his behind and do this is his cadiologist. He treated him while he was on active duty.

Can anyone direct me into the right direction of an example of what needs to be in the letter and such.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DON20906

I checked my contact at the BVA and the Board is now working appeals that were docketed in April-July 2004. Some VLJs are ahead of that curve. Some are behind.

I finally got my husband to call the VA to find out the status of his appeal. The lady was shocked, because it is listed as with the Decision Officer and it has been for two years! She didn't want to have it pulled, because you know what happens then, you go down to the bottom of the pile. But she made a note (at least she said she did) in the computer about it.

On average, how long does it take for the BVA to come down with a decision? I finally got a copy of a letter from our primary doctor saying that my husband's condition is chronic and it started while he was on active duty. It was faxed to our State VA Rep. who is suppose to represent us and send this info to Atlanta, but I am not impressed with this guy, he is the second one we have had, neither one ever communicated with us. But I have no idea if they BVA ever received the letter. Would it be wise to send another copy straight to the VA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DON20906

If an appeal is remanded or otherwise diverted from the VLJ working it, it is supposed to be restored to it's place in docket order when it is returned.

I checked my contact at the BVA and the Board is now working appeals that were docketed in April-July 2004. Some VLJs are ahead of that curve. Some are behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe this would help- I am describing the IMO I got from Dr. Bash.

First he stated that he had reviewed Post service VA medical records,

past VA medical opinions and rating decisions,

and did a medical literature review.

He then stated his opinion on the veteran's long standing "uncontrolled and untreated" diabetes and also agreed with the brief recent opinion I had asked a VA doctor for (the doctor had treated Rod)

His then listed Special Knoweldge and gave his areas of expertise , adding that he had correlated his experience with MRI, CT scans, and nuclear med scans of thousands of patients with diabetes and cerebral trauma as to the veteran's medical records.

He listed Facts: as to other med info in the records and then added a Discussion of his opinion which included 7 points. Briefly stated here-

The veteran was exposed to Agent Orange and he referred to the Institute of Medicine 2002 Agent Orange Update as to DMII in Vietnam vets.

He again stated the veteran's documented abnormal glucose readings while in a prolonged fasting state.

He stated there was no other etiology for the veteran's diabetes but for AO.

He quoted Braunwald (a well known Cardiovascular medical treatise) giving a page number as to the same Peripheral arterial disease that Rod had as consistent with diabetes.

He referenced the autopsy and death certificate as well as statements made by two additional VA doctors as to the veterans heart and brain involvement from undiagnosed and untreated DMII.

He added a 10 page Curriculum Vitae.

In addition to his opinion and before I requested it I had found significant other medical information to support undiagosed and untreated DMII as well as I supplied copy of VA's own admission of misdiagnosing strokes, heart disease, and their inappropriate medication which the VA agreed in 1997 had caused Rod's death.(FTCA settlement) This allowed me to opine also in my claim that, since the VA had failed to diagnose heart disease, and strokes, and had given the veteran inappropriate medication in "multiple" medical errors that had "all" "hastened" his death (Section 1151 award 1998) Therefore it was most likely that the VA had failed to diagnose and treat the veteran's DMII.

A good IMO should cover what Dr. BAsh's did here-

His medical rationale and expertise that lent him to opine.

References to specifics in the veterans med recs, supported by medical treatise, a "more than likely" statement is in there too-as to the veteran's exposure to AO caused diabetes, undiagnosed (but prevalant from evidence in VA med records back to 1988)which then led to heart disease, strokes, and death.

However I did not need a service nexus-Dr. Bash did not need the SMRs-and the veteran's exposure was confirmed by Judge Richland years ago (Agent Orange settlement fund)

This is why the doctor would need the complete SMRs-in your case-to support the inservice nexus-

I hope this helps- a good IMO does not have to be long- mine is only 2 pages plus the Curriculum Vitae and also Dr. Bash called the VA doctor I got IMO from -and enclosed copy of that opinion too.

In my case prior SOCs and SSocs and other VA documents were highly significant to this IMO and I sent them to Dr. BAsh.

In addition to this opinion I spent the time to associate Rod's specific heart disease and then brain trauma to known medical facts as to the diabetic causation.I enclosed a diagram of two sides of brain showing the veteran's type of trauma and the medical association to DMII-

(not all brain trauma is due to DMII -of course) The submission I did of the heart evidence -I copied an autopsied heart-with LVH very similiar to Rods autopsy in full color into my statement and supported every single piece of medical evidence from the autopsy and the VA Echo as consistent with DMII and supported all of this with med treatises.

I correlated Rod's documented VA medical evidence with information from the Standard medical community to include the ADA, and the AHA and numerous other medical sources.

I went over ever single med rec many times and found that-even without the IMOs- the evidence supporting my claim was overwhelming.

I am getting a little off your question here but my point is that when there is evidence-

it can be found.It just takes long hours of reading and work putting it all together.

Vets -keep all of those SOCs and past decisions -I did, never dreaming I would need them again-in reading them carefully 6-7 years later-they revealed more info than I could see at the time-

And dont do what I did-years ago- I used to I believe what the Narrative said as to their "expert" VA opinions-

When I got the actual opinion it was often much different than I thought-

My claim was filed for Peace with Honor- what my husband wanted in his death. That does not come with a Section 1151 death.

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.

       

      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.

       

      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.

       

      P&T

       

      TDIU

       

       

       

      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.

       










      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.


      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.


      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law


      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual


      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures


      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation


      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

       
      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.

       

      The report is here:

      https://www.nap.edu/read/25137/chapter/2

      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.

       

       

       
      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines