Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Need To Service Connect Recent Diagnosis


I have been receiving 40% for lower and upper back pain and ringing in the ears since my discharge in 1997. I have a claim pending for PTSD, the VA tells me my claim is in review (they are awaiting records) from somewhere to prove I was in Somalia.

Anyways, back in May 06, I was diagnosed with congestive heart failure with ejection fraction of 20%, my civilian doctor placed me on 7 different meds and last month, I had an I.C.D./Pacemaker implanted. If I can get this condition service connected, it is automatic 100% according to the schedule of ratings.

Should I wait on my ruling for PTSD, or submit a claim for CHF right away? I'm concerned that if I mail my CHF claim to the VA in Nashville, they will stop proceedings on my PTSD claim? I'm sort of confused and would like some advise from the more seasoned members.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Jim- good question - however- the sooner you file the additional claim, then you will get the best Effective date on it-

It is more than likely that they would finish the PTSD claim before even addressing the CHF claim.

You will need a medical nexus- a strong medical statement that the heart disease is connected to your service-or a strong medical statement that it could be due to your PTSD- that has been done but it is not easy.

Somalia-doesn't your DD 214 reflect that you were there? Certain decorations listed on your DD 214 could denote combat if you claim stressors due to combat ops.

I suggest too that you go to NARA:

http://www.archives.gov/ click on Military Records-

You can fil out the SF 180 right on line, you will need a printer to print out the bar coded thing that you sign and then mail to where it says-

Ask them for your complete service records to include all medical records.

There could well be a nexus (link) to your disabilities in those records if you exhibited any symptoms of CHF in service-this will be the hardest part of the CHF claim- proving the link to your service.

Have you ever had malaria in service? or beri beri? anemia documented in service?

I tried to find a link and this unusual report popped up:


And this med report shows what I mean too:


This is a Somalia vet- whose PTSD claim was denied -

"As a result, the analysis of stressor verification is not so

much bisected by whether the event is "combat" or

"noncombat," but whether there is "conclusive evidence" of a

combat stressor, or "credible supporting evidence from any

source" of a combat or noncombat stressor. The veteran has

been requested to identify events in service that he believes

are the stressor or stressors that caused PTSD. His asserted

stressors were listed in his stressor letter and other

correspondence, but the contemporaneous service records do

not corroborate the claimed death of a Marine after a search

of the specified unit records. There is no corroboration of

his recollection that he was confronted with a threat to his

life or serious injury or that his response involved intense

fear, horror or helplessness in recalling the rules of

engagement or circumstances of his military experience in

Somalia. The existence of a stressor, but not its

sufficiency, is an adjudication determination" BVA

The VA will be looking for combat awards as proof of stressors or then they will acquire your mil records to corroborate your stressors-

Have you have a PTSD C & P yet and filled out the PTSD questionnaire?

Have you actually been diagnosed with PTSD yet?

Have you been in touch with your unit if you should need a buddy statement?

Since you are SCed already I am surprised that they dont have the Somalia info already but then again----

I also suggest that you send the VARO a request in writing for a complete copy of your c file-

that too will hold up your claim a little but it is always best to know what they have and the Somalia service is probably verified right in the c file? But maybe not-

Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! You guys are AWESOME!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome Tim!!

Berta is a wealth of information!! :)

I wanted to also add, while you where on active duty, where you ever diagnosed as having hypertension? Because that could be a nexus to the CHF. I would get a copy of your SMR and look at all the B/P readings, take them to you doctor and see if he would provide the nexus. You could have been borderline hypertensive for a while and didn't know it...or you could have had some high readings over a period of time and the military doctors never picked up on it.

Edited by EODMOMMY

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.


      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.


      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.








      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.


      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.

      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.

      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law

      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual

      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures

      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation

      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.


      The report is here:


      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.



      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines