Often veterans become upset with a VA Rating Decision, see the appellate rights and opt for filing a Notice of Disagreement (NOD). This will typically invoke a long and arduous appeals process. Appeals within the VA system often last 2-6 years, not including BVA remands.
A much easier way to continiously prosecute claims is by filing for reconsideration/readjudication of a prior VA decision. Typically, claimants have one year from the date of notification of a VA decision to either file an appeal or request reconsideration of the prior decision with new and material evidence. This is evidence which has not previously been considered and may serve to overturn prior decisions.
If new and material evidence is received within the appellate period for any decision which has not become final the provisions of 38 C.F.R. 3.400(q) would be for application whereas the Court held, "VA must consider any new and material evidence received during the one-year appeal period following an RO decision as having been filed in connection with the claim which was pending at the beginning of the appeal period." See also Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet.App. 477 (2009).
Generally claimant's are unaware of the evidence required for a favorable decision, however, a proper VA Rating Decision (VARD) should provide adequate reasons and basis for the denial of any condition. Within a VARD there should be discussion of evidence considered in the service medical records, the evidence submitted, and findings of any VA examination to include rationale of the examiner as to why or why not a nexus opinion is given in regard to service connection.
Equally, the most common reason for a denial is not for lack of in-service treatment, or evidence of a current disability, but the medical opinion relating that condition to service.
Generally service connection requires (1) evidence of an in-service, injury, disease, or event, whic was caused, incurred or aggravated in the line of duty, (2) a current chronic or disabling condition, and (3) a competent medical opinion relating the two to service.
Of the claimant can overcome a VA medical opinion with a competent medical opinion, which is as equally thorough or greater in probative value than that of a VA examiner, then the claim should be reconsidered and granted. This can be accomplished by asking for reconsideration of the prior decision, and effective dates should be assigned accordingly. This technique can win cases in a much faster fashion than electing to file an appeal, which in the send will requires the same type of evidence for a claimant to prevail.
Question
rakkwarrior
Often veterans become upset with a VA Rating Decision, see the appellate rights and opt for filing a Notice of Disagreement (NOD). This will typically invoke a long and arduous appeals process. Appeals within the VA system often last 2-6 years, not including BVA remands.
A much easier way to continiously prosecute claims is by filing for reconsideration/readjudication of a prior VA decision. Typically, claimants have one year from the date of notification of a VA decision to either file an appeal or request reconsideration of the prior decision with new and material evidence. This is evidence which has not previously been considered and may serve to overturn prior decisions.
If new and material evidence is received within the appellate period for any decision which has not become final the provisions of 38 C.F.R. 3.400(q) would be for application whereas the Court held, "VA must consider any new and material evidence received during the one-year appeal period following an RO decision as having been filed in connection with the claim which was pending at the beginning of the appeal period." See also Rice v. Shinseki, 22 Vet.App. 477 (2009).
Generally claimant's are unaware of the evidence required for a favorable decision, however, a proper VA Rating Decision (VARD) should provide adequate reasons and basis for the denial of any condition. Within a VARD there should be discussion of evidence considered in the service medical records, the evidence submitted, and findings of any VA examination to include rationale of the examiner as to why or why not a nexus opinion is given in regard to service connection.
Equally, the most common reason for a denial is not for lack of in-service treatment, or evidence of a current disability, but the medical opinion relating that condition to service.
Generally service connection requires (1) evidence of an in-service, injury, disease, or event, whic was caused, incurred or aggravated in the line of duty, (2) a current chronic or disabling condition, and (3) a competent medical opinion relating the two to service.
Of the claimant can overcome a VA medical opinion with a competent medical opinion, which is as equally thorough or greater in probative value than that of a VA examiner, then the claim should be reconsidered and granted. This can be accomplished by asking for reconsideration of the prior decision, and effective dates should be assigned accordingly. This technique can win cases in a much faster fashion than electing to file an appeal, which in the send will requires the same type of evidence for a claimant to prevail.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
6
4
2
Popular Days
Mar 31
9
Feb 19
7
Feb 21
2
Mar 30
2
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 6 posts
rakkwarrior 6 posts
COOL BREEZE 4 posts
Pete53 2 posts
Popular Days
Mar 31 2011
9 posts
Feb 19 2011
7 posts
Feb 21 2011
2 posts
Mar 30 2011
2 posts
21 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now