Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0

Gulf War Vets


I was an NBC specialist and can tell you that I have no idea what we were given as shots as we were waiting for and boarding the plane for Southwest Asia but I do know that nothing was EVER recorded (to include the PB pills) and as a forward unit, when incoming came and the 256 read (+) for whatever....we were just told to shut up. Guess that wasnt recorded either.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Our M8 started screaming at about 3am one morning. We all MOPP'ed up in a hurry but nothing happened. It just seemed to be forgotten.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


I can't tell you how many times our chemical alarms went off and we were told to ignore it.

I was at King Fahd Airport when SCUD missiles shot towards Dhaharan were intercepted by Patriot missiles almost directly over our heads. We were warned about the incoming missiles but no one thought to MOPP up after the overhead explosions. After we deployed forward, we had multiple alarms on a daily basis. The only time we were ever told to MOPP up was after receiving a warning of potential incoming SCUDs while we were deployed on the Saudi Arabia/Iraq border.

While still at King Fahd we were lined up on a daily basis and had to take our PB pills in front of our company commander or platoon leader. Back in the US, we got a ton of shots before deploying. What we were injected with I can't tell you.

I always thought it was ironic that, before we deployed, the NBC threat was a much talked about issue and in theater it was almost a joke. From the outset, there was a huge concern by command and the line troops that Saddam would unleash his chemical arsenal on coalition troops, particularly when he got backed into a corner. After years of learning about and training for Soviet NBC munitions, once the reality that such weapons might actually be used against us hit us pretty hard. Things like the anthrax vaccine and the PB pills were knee jerk reactions to an actual threat we hadn't faced since WWII. There was no time to the FDA to study the drugs and deem them safe. Nope, we were given meds that were considered experimental and no one new what the outcome would be. They said the risk was worth the benefit.

On one hand, command was willing to take whatever steps necessary to protect troop assets but once we actually got in the field they turned a deaf ear and a closed eye to all the chemical alarms. When did the concern turn into ambivalence? Perhaps more importantly, why did that happen?

20 years later its clear we were exposed to chemical toxins and that stuff like the PB pills made it all worse instead of better. The sucky part is that GWI just keeps getting worse as time goes on.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:



        • Thanks

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines